Skip to content
Alfa Romeo models, news & reviews
3
Handling
Performance
4
Usability
Feelgood factor
5
Readers' rating
By Tim Pollard
First Drives
23 May 2011 12:02
Here’s the thing about the Alfa Romeo 159: it could be launched today and I’d wager you and I would be slavering over it. You’d be hard pressed to believe this is a six-year-old design, so shapely is the 159’s style. And the 159 Sportwagon estate is equally desirable – those Design Giugiaro badges on the flanks seem very deserved.
That’s the trouble with Alfa Romeos. They tug at the heart strings. Always have, probably always will. We tested the latest Alfa 159 Sportwagon 2.0 JTDM with 170bhp and, in its optional pearly red (not pictured), it gathered more attention in the office car park than any other car nearing the end of its life has any right to. There’s still a bit of a wait, as the new Alfa Romeo Giulia launch has been pushed back to 2013.
Sadly when you look beyond that Latin visage, some of the 159 package is beginning to feel its age. From the moment you plip the key, only to hear ominous Subaru-style beeps that’ll alarm your neighbours, you realise some of the tech onboard is, ahem, a little old tech.
Sink into those fab, grippy front seats (standard on our top-dog TI trim) and it’s a mixed bag. The dashboard feels a few years behind the latest C-class and A4, although we note the 2005 3-series is feeling its age now too (it will be replaced in 2012). It’s to do with the 159’s cheaper plastics (ours sported light scratches around the gearlever); the chaotic ergonomics with the Alfa sat-nav mounted down low practically at knee level; electronic read-outs seemingly from the 1990s; passenger footwell carpet that fell loose revealing floorpan behind; and a multimedia screen that feels a little too Halfords for our liking. The sat-nav functionality is way behind the competition and the Bluetooth failed to pair with my Blackberry.
It’s not all bad news. The dash top has a pleasingly soft squidge to it, while the driving position is reassuringly good, the driver’s seat tipping front and back for plenty of choice. Time to do the road test review bit.
Start up the 2.0 JTDM and you immediately notice how well behaved this common-rail diesel engine is. We shouldn’t be surprised; the Fiat group did invent common-rail diesels a decade ago, and they continue to produce some cracking oilers in all shapes and sizes.
Select first, and you’ll notice the precise, slotty gearchange. It’s all boding rather well. The JTDM develops 170bhp and 266lb ft, but feels like it needs a good rev to get the most out of it. Happily, it spins sweetly for a diesel and I never once was rattled into submission to pick a higher gear. It’s a refined and smooth engine, and that gearchange is a pleasure to use with a reassuring mechanical slot.
The higher-powered 170bhp 2.0 JTDM doesn’t feel that quick though, which makes us question the lower-powered 136bhp version now on offer. Alfa quotes 8.8sec 0-62mph and 52.3mpg, although we averaged closer to 33mpg during our week with the car. We noticed a slight turbo lag with not much happening beneath 2000rpm. The epically tall gearing must be partly to blame; we occasionally found ourselves in fourth on motorways, so long-legged are the higher ratios.
We’ve become so used to brilliant turbodiesels where we have it all, and the 159’s doesn’t perform quite as strongly as you might expect - especially when it comes to emissions. Here’s how it stacks up to the competition:
Alas, those years are creeping on Alfa’s compact exec. The 159 is a slightly perplexing car to drive. Even on our car’s 19in wheels, it rides pretty well on motorways and smoother tarmac, with a good primary ride and only secondary bumps upsetting progress on back roads. The biggest shock was a ridged concrete section of the M42 which thumped and bumped into the cabin, as if the basic structure wasn’t stiff enough.
Turn off the arterial roads and seek out a good back road for a blast, and the 159 unravels further. Those Bridgestone Potenza 235/40 R19s jiggle and crash around on potholed A- and B-roads, the steering wheel squirms if you lean on the chassis during faster corners and it becomes really hard to thread the 159 Sportwagon along in a flowing, smooth manner. An E90 3-series - launched at the same time, remember - would leave it for dead.
That said, after nearly 700 miles in the 159, it does grow on you. The steering is pretty pointy and quick-witted, and it’d drive rings around an Audi A4, the only other notable front-drive premium competition. You can even heel ‘n’ toe in it, and it’s not often we say that about a diesel estate.
One quick note about night-driving; that complex front end styling works wonders, six individual front lights paying dividends with great illumination.
Another mixed report here. The Alfa 156, the 159’s predecessor, famously had more boot space in saloon form than estate. The 159 has 445 litres – only 40 more than the four-door, and the luggage bay is a good width and length, with an effective, simple load cover to keep prying eyes at bay, several useful cubby holes and with a ski hatch. Problem is, the 159 Sportwagon’s boot lip is an extraordinary 25cm deep – it’s the least accessible estate car boot we’ve tried in ages.
The rear seats are unfathomably tight on legroom, too. Considering this is a compact executive estate, you’d get more rear-passenger space in a VW Golf. Adults’ heads will brush the roof while taller occupants will nudge their knees into the back of front-seat passengers.
I said at the beginning that the 159 neatly encapsulates the Alfa Romeo problem. It’s a gorgeous-looking thing, a compact exec with some real brio about it in a sea of same-again Germans. And yet how we wished they brought even a snippet of the Teutonic logic to bear in areas such as the cabin ergonomics, electronic systems and attention to detail.
We’d say Alfa’s been on a stylistic roll for, well, forever really. Can you name the last duff Alfa Romeo design? If they can make the new Giulia look half as good, and half as better again in the weak spots, it could be quite a car. Every time you tug those slim slivers of aluminium that double as door handles, you’ll be pleased you opted out of the German hegemony.
Just one final plea to CEO Sergio Marchionne’s men: don’t make the new 159 too sensible, too brilliantly polished in every area; I can just imagine people like me bemoaning boring perfection in an Alfa Romeo.
Add your comment
Sign in You must be signed in to submit a comment.
Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.0 JTDM TI (2011) CAR review
Subject
Your comment
By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions
Cancel
You must be logged in to subscribe to a topic
Login or register now
typos1 says
RE: Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon 2.0 JTDM TI (2011) CAR review
Theres no "own an Alfa" dilema for me-I m on my third (one 156 and onmy second 147). Theyve all been faultlessly reliable needing only general wear and tear items, theyve also all been 95,000= cars, that I ve taken to 135,000 miles and theyve all been diesels-maybe thats why theyve been reliable. They handle very well, I particularly like the steering, which isnt lacking in feedback as some have said. Confucius-the 159 shares only it's engines with the 156 (and they were heavily modified)-its was built on an entirely new platform-the joint GM/Fiat "premium" platform-and was the only car to use it in the end. It was on the heavy side when it came out, but it went on a diet and lost 45kg after two years, plus the opposition has all but "caught up" weight wise since.
Theres no "own an Alfa" dilema for me-I m on my third (one 156 and onmy second 147). Theyve all been faultlessly reliable needing only general wear and tear items, theyve also all been 95,000= cars, that I ve taken to 135,000 miles and theyve all been diesels-maybe thats why theyve been reliable. They handle very well, I particularly like the steering, which isnt lacking in feedback as some have said.
Confucius-the 159 shares only it's engines with the 156 (and they were heavily modified)-its was built on an entirely new platform-the joint GM/Fiat "premium" platform-and was the only car to use it in the end. It was on the heavy side when it came out, but it went on a diet and lost 45kg after two years, plus the opposition has all but "caught up" weight wise since.
01 June 2011 17:50
georgeboyter says
I can identify with the 'own an Alfa' dilemma completely. I was at the big Mirafiori Turin multi-marque showroom last week and sat in all the cars. I was particularly interested in how I'd feel getting into this particular estate. It does look great from the outside, beautifully proportioned, elegant and distinctive especially when compared with the excesses of BMW and Mercedes Benz. Getting into the interior there is a palpable sense of disappointment - something tactile and something visual. I'd like Alfa to work harder at designing distinctively Alfa interiors - maybe a touch of 'crackle black' somewhere, certainly a confident use of binnacles, seems to me Alfa-like. Steering wheels and gear knobs should be more distinctive with elements harking back to the '50's - some alloy - NO PLASTIC SUBSTITUTES PLEASE whatever the cost. Ultimately though. I don't think you'd ever feel envious of someone driving any of the competition if you're behind the wheel of an Alfa Romeo though. But they should be rear wheel drive - please.
I can identify with the 'own an Alfa' dilemma completely. I was at the big Mirafiori Turin multi-marque showroom last week and sat in all the cars. I was particularly interested in how I'd feel getting into this particular estate. It does look great from the outside, beautifully proportioned, elegant and distinctive especially when compared with the excesses of BMW and Mercedes Benz.
Getting into the interior there is a palpable sense of disappointment - something tactile and something visual. I'd like Alfa to work harder at designing distinctively Alfa interiors - maybe a touch of 'crackle black' somewhere, certainly a confident use of binnacles, seems to me Alfa-like. Steering wheels and gear knobs should be more distinctive with elements harking back to the '50's - some alloy - NO PLASTIC SUBSTITUTES PLEASE whatever the cost.
Ultimately though. I don't think you'd ever feel envious of someone driving any of the competition if you're behind the wheel of an Alfa Romeo though. But they should be rear wheel drive - please.
27 May 2011 11:14
Goatboy says
Clarkson may have discribed the Alfa 145 as a breadvan, but in the initial review on Top Gear, he raved about the styling and claimed it to be the best car in it's class. And by the way, can we stop using Clarkson as some kind of automotive philosopher's stone? He changes his views with the prevailing wind if he thinks it will get a cheap laugh. You can't trust a word he says. But to get back on topic, the 156 was a very successful car for Alfa Romeo. Why? Well, it was a good car for a start. The fact that the motoring press gave it a very good review can't have hurt. Why has the 159 failed? I can only guess that after the 156, it was viewed as a disappointment. It far too heavy for a start, which is the enemy of good road behavior and of course performance but also, the big three German marques have the market sown up, especially in the hearts and minds of the general public. Audi,BMW, Mercedes - it's a default choice. Instant credibility amongst your dinner companions and no embarrasing explanations to "you've got a what"? We're losing more than we can ever replace in this race to conformity. We've lost Lancia already, Saab could follow any day now and Alfa are endangered. Is this the future we want? Audi, BMW, Mercedes. The illusion of choice.
Clarkson may have discribed the Alfa 145 as a breadvan, but in the initial review on Top Gear, he raved about the styling and claimed it to be the best car in it's class. And by the way, can we stop using Clarkson as some kind of automotive philosopher's stone? He changes his views with the prevailing wind if he thinks it will get a cheap laugh. You can't trust a word he says.
But to get back on topic, the 156 was a very successful car for Alfa Romeo. Why? Well, it was a good car for a start. The fact that the motoring press gave it a very good review can't have hurt. Why has the 159 failed? I can only guess that after the 156, it was viewed as a disappointment. It far too heavy for a start, which is the enemy of good road behavior and of course performance but also, the big three German marques have the market sown up, especially in the hearts and minds of the general public. Audi,BMW, Mercedes - it's a default choice. Instant credibility amongst your dinner companions and no embarrasing explanations to "you've got a what"?
We're losing more than we can ever replace in this race to conformity. We've lost Lancia already, Saab could follow any day now and Alfa are endangered. Is this the future we want?
Audi, BMW, Mercedes. The illusion of choice.
26 May 2011 20:11
bertandnairobi says
Stylistic successes in recent times: the 164, the GTV, the Spider, the 156 and the Bertone-styled coupe. The 147 looked as good the day it was phased out as the day it was launched and I don´t recall reading one single word of criticism about its appearance. It was both contemporary and in tune with Alfa values. Above all it was not contrived. Some might even add the Brera to the success list though personally I don´t care for the proportions. Open for discussion are the revised 166 and the fully-revised 155 which was a wholly different beast from the phase 1 car. The 159 is nice but only because it slavishly copies the 156. About the 145 and the 146: Clarkson´s aesthetic sensiblity reside very far inside his large intestine. His views are not what I´d call refined or considered or subtle. If Clarkson thinks something is funny he´ll say it, even if it not true. Did the 145 look like a breadvan? No, it looked unconventional which is anathema to a man as insecure as I suspect J Clarkson is. Not that I think he´s a bad fellow, just that he´s not a deep thinker and nor does he demonstrate much wisdom. What I am saying is that Clarkson´s opinion on style don´t carry much weight especially as he still likes jeans and leather jackets and he wore a mullett until the middle 1990s. About the only thing I líke about JC is that he likes his cigarettes. The 146 is still a crisp and smart bit of styling which I´d add to the list of recent Alfa styling successes. The cars I don´t add are the new Giulia and the Mito which are indeed overcooked. If Alfa was on a roll, it´s ended for now with the latest cars, at least in terms of design.
Stylistic successes in recent times: the 164, the GTV, the Spider, the 156 and the Bertone-styled coupe. The 147 looked as good the day it was phased out as the day it was launched and I don´t recall reading one single word of criticism about its appearance. It was both contemporary and in tune with Alfa values. Above all it was not contrived.
Some might even add the Brera to the success list though personally I don´t care for the proportions.
Open for discussion are the revised 166 and the fully-revised 155 which was a wholly different beast from the phase 1 car. The 159 is nice but only because it slavishly copies the 156.
About the 145 and the 146: Clarkson´s aesthetic sensiblity reside very far inside his large intestine. His views are not what I´d call refined or considered or subtle. If Clarkson thinks something is funny he´ll say it, even if it not true. Did the 145 look like a breadvan? No, it looked unconventional which is anathema to a man as insecure as I suspect J Clarkson is. Not that I think he´s a bad fellow, just that he´s not a deep thinker and nor does he demonstrate much wisdom. What I am saying is that Clarkson´s opinion on style don´t carry much weight especially as he still likes jeans and leather jackets and he wore a mullett until the middle 1990s. About the only thing I líke about JC is that he likes his cigarettes.
The 146 is still a crisp and smart bit of styling which I´d add to the list of recent Alfa styling successes.
The cars I don´t add are the new Giulia and the Mito which are indeed overcooked. If Alfa was on a roll, it´s ended for now with the latest cars, at least in terms of design.
26 May 2011 18:08
Quattro says
Tim come on. The medium size segment is probably the only segment where Alfa's design philosophy actually works. Granted it's a pretty car but I don't agree that * Alfa has been on a roll.. well forever* Their small cars are invarably a mess stylistically. Both the Mito and Guilletta are either bug-eyed and/or slab-sided making them look like monsters in base trim. It's a shame but I am usually disappointed by anything that is compact exec size from Alfa. Can I recall the last duff Alfa? Having lived near an Alfa dealer I can clearly recall numerous duffs large and small...those included the 145 (The Bread Van as Clarkson famously called it), 33, 75 & 155 to name a few... On a stylistic roll since forever. Nah, I just can't give you that one...
Tim come on.
The medium size segment is probably the only segment where Alfa's design philosophy actually works. Granted it's a pretty car but I don't agree that * Alfa has been on a roll.. well forever* Their small cars are invarably a mess stylistically. Both the Mito and Guilletta are either bug-eyed and/or slab-sided making them look like monsters in base trim. It's a shame but I am usually disappointed by anything that is compact exec size from Alfa.
Can I recall the last duff Alfa? Having lived near an Alfa dealer I can clearly recall numerous duffs large and small...those included the 145 (The Bread Van as Clarkson famously called it), 33, 75 & 155 to name a few...
On a stylistic roll since forever. Nah, I just can't give you that one...
26 May 2011 12:10
Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.
Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)
Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.