Skip to content
BMW models, news & reviews
5
Handling
Performance
4
Usability
Feelgood factor
Readers' rating
By Chris Chilton
First Drives
22 December 2011 09:54
A new BMW 3-series is a big deal. The default sports saloon accounts for one third of BMW’s sales so the Munich firm can’t afford to get it wrong. Read on for CAR's first drive review of the new BMW 3-series.
More than you’d imagine. Built on a new platform, the new 3-series (codenamed F30) is 93mm longer than the old E90, 50mm of which goes into the wheelbase to improve rear legroom by 15mm. Boot space is up by 20 litres and the track is wider too, by 37mm at the front, and 47mm at the rear. But despite this, the F30 is actually lighter than the old car, by up to 45kg depending on engine and spec
Anoraks will know that the original E21 3-series didn’t get its first six until it had been on sale for a couple of years, but given how inextricably linked the 3-series has been to the six-pot over the past three and bit decades, it’s strange to think that the new car will launch with just one engine packing more than four cylinders: the 302bhp 335i.
Other engines will come later, but the initial lineup starts at £24,880 and comprises four diesels (115bhp 316d, 141bhp 318d, 161bhp 320d Efficient Dynamics, 181bhp 320d) and three petrols (181bhp 320i, 242bhp 328i and the 335i). The 320i and 328i are part of a new range of turbocharged 2.0 engines already filtering into the Z4 and 5-series, using direct injection and twin-scroll turbos to give the performance of the old sixes and near-diesel economy.
Sonically, there’s no comparison. But in every other respect, this is a superb engine. The 328i we drove will hit 62mph in 5.9sec yet returns 44mpg on the combined cycle and emits only 149g/km of CO2. It revs cleanly and exhibits very little lag when you punch the throttle from crusing speeds.
The other car we drove was a 320d. Not the super-frugal Efficient Dynamics version that does 62mph in 8sec and a Prius-like 69mpg, but the regular 320d. Both deliver the same 280lb ft of torque, but the ordinary 20d gets to 62mph 0.5sec quicker at the expense of 7.5mpg and emissions that are only good (120g/km) rather than outstanding (109g/km). At £28,080 each, and that’s before you get into adding one of the new Modern, Sport or Luxury trim packages, they’re not cheap options – you can have a 328i for just a grand more. But with performance to match the 320i, 50% better economy and virtually no handling handicap they’ll be hard to beat for the fleet user.
Forget the old car’s slabby dash and Eastern Bloc dinginess, the new one is miles better. Bar the splashes of colour on Sport models, it’s fairly conservative, but the materials are far superior and road noise is noticably reduced. And every model gets iDrive and its own colour screen, plus cruise control, keyless start and Bluetooth. But with collision mitigation systems, BMW’s excellent head-up display and handling goodies like a big brake kit, adaptive dampers and variable-rate steering on the options list, it’s going to be easy to add £5-10k to the list price.
It’s a simple mechanical rack with different tooth-spacing at the ends than at the centre to lessen arm twirling on really tight roads, like the rack Porsche introduced with the 997, and replaces the generally unloved optional active steering system. It works well, and after a couple of minutes the gearing shift feels perfectly natural, and switchbacks a joy. But while ultra-precise, it feels disarmingly light after the Herculean forces needed to twist the wheel on an E90. We’d like to have tried the basic rack, but neither it or the mid-range Servotronic option were available. All three are electric.
Same story with the dampers: all the launch cars were fitted with the excellent £750 Adpative M suspension, which gives a great ride in Comfort mode, but appreciably better body control in Sport and still sufficient comfort to warrant leaving it there for most journeys. This is a really well balanced car, one that reveles in its 50:50 weight distribution and rear-drive layout, and one that feels so much more lithe than Audi’s often leaden A4. It’s also one that rides so well – it’s almost a surprise to discover that it’s still fitted with run-flat tyres. This is surely the best-driving car in its class, but we really need to try more chassis configurations to know which works best, and which option boxes are worth ticking.
Although it was showing a few wrinkles, the old 3-series was still competitive when the axe fell. But this new car moves the game on with useful gains in refinement while retaining that dynamic edge. Straight to the top of the class.>> For the full story on the new BMW 3-series, see the January 2012 issue of CAR Magazine, on sale now. Click here for a digital preview
Add your comment
Sign in You must be signed in to submit a comment.
BMW 320d SE (2012) CAR review
Subject
Your comment
By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions
Cancel
You must be logged in to subscribe to a topic
Login or register now
nersen says
RE: BMW 320d SE (2012) CAR review
Just saw it at the local dealer .......it looks much better than the E90....on the outside. ....... but the interiors are too fussy now...... eg beige dials on the luxury line (tribut to the Rover 75)?? The red stripe in the Sport version? The rippled wood trim is not good........ got back into my E92 and found it much classier..... good design is not about gimmicks, but simple clarity and quality ,......
12 February 2012 14:18
JohnnyD says
Can't say I was ever a big fan of the outgoing E90, M3 apart. But this not only looks the real deal but with those new engines and improvements in ride and steering, the F30 really is the REAL DEAL.
04 January 2012 16:09
moletrap says
I'm always interested, when reading a review of a new model, in seeing the implicit criticism of the old model, some of which was obvious when the old model was 'the one'. Here it's the rear legroom, ride, dash and equipment, all of which were known weaknesses, plus the steering, which I've never heard criticised in a 3 before. Was the old one that bad? I'm sure this new one is great to drive, but is that sufficient on its own? No, it's ALL about image of course, stupid me!
I'm always interested, when reading a review of a new model, in seeing the implicit criticism of the old model, some of which was obvious when the old model was 'the one'. Here it's the rear legroom, ride, dash and equipment, all of which were known weaknesses, plus the steering, which I've never heard criticised in a 3 before. Was the old one that bad?
I'm sure this new one is great to drive, but is that sufficient on its own? No, it's ALL about image of course, stupid me!
04 January 2012 12:40
attomole says
Agreed, I was a bit over the top Rikerby, actualy there rubbish, by a Yeti.
30 December 2011 20:02
rickerby says
BMW is also rather good at brainwashing attomole, as witnessed by your post
29 December 2011 12:34
Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.
Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)
Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.