Skip to content
BMW models, news & reviews
5
Handling
4
Performance
Usability
Feelgood factor
Readers' rating
4.5
By Chris Chilton
First Drives
10 October 2012 15:25
The 3-series Touring is a massively important car to UK buyers: BMW GB expects to shift over 35,000 new-shape 3-series in 2013, and 8000 of them will sport that fifth door. On sale in the UK from September, the fifth generation of BMW’s posh load lugger is 97mm longer than before, and measures 50mm longer between the wheels.
Some of that extra space benefits rear passengers, a whopping 17mm extra knee room in the back banishing fears of DVT forever. More usefully, boot space is up by 35 litres, pushing overall capacity to 495 litres with the seats up and 1500 litres when they’re folded flat. No one is going to quibble about the odd litre, but it does give BMW bragging rights over the 490/1430-litre Audi A4 and Avant and 485/1500 litre Mercedes C-class. Carried over is the last Touring’s separate lift-up glass window, a brilliant idea that’s far more useful in practice than it sounds. Why other manufacturers – Land Rover aside – have yet to pick up on it, is a mystery.
Unusually, the tailgate comes electrically operated as standard. I normally can’t stand the things, which take an age to open and shut, but the BMW’s version at least makes it easy to override the motor when you’re in a hurry. A ‘smart opener’, part of the Comfort Access option pack, even opens it for you in response to a waved shoe under the rear bumper, a boon for mafia hitmen fed up with having to put down a freshly whacked body just to unlock the boot before stashing the corpse. The boot itself is a great shape, with a flat floor, low load-sill, only the most modest of wheelarch intrusions, and a 40-20-40 split seatback. And it’s all been achieved without compromising the style one bit. In fact, to our eyes, the Touring is by far the more elegant car.
Elegance probably isn’t topping the list of fleet buyers picking the 3-series for their reps in the UK, but economy is. BMW thinks the biggest seller will be the 320d, which manages to combine 60mpg fuel consumption and a whispering 124g/km of CO2, with the ability to sprint from 0-62mph in 7.7sec. It’s an incredible engine, but we’ll have to presume it drives as well as it does in the saloon because the only cars available to try at the Touring launch were 328is fitted with BMW’s twin-power turbocharged 2.0 petrol.
At £30,400 before options, the 328i requires £1020 deeper pockets than the 320d and though incredibly clean by petrol standards, its 45mpg and 159g/km stats mean it won’t make much of a dent in the sales figures. But it is quick little tool, hitting 62mph in 6.0sec and requiring the fitment of an electronic limiter to curb its autobahn enthusiasm. Shame it doesn’t sound as sexy as a six. Denied – for the first few months of production, at least - the 16d, 18d, 20i and 35i engines offered in the saloon, the only other engine available to Touring buyers at launch is the 330d. Unlike the 320d and 328i, this one comes only with a ZF eight-speed auto, and costs a steep £34,700, but 55mpg and 5.6sec to 62mph sounds like ample compensation.
Doubtless the Touring suffers a crucial 0.9% reduction in agility from behind the wheel of the new Touring compared with the saloon, but without driving the two together, it’s hard to believe the wagon suffers at all. Among options, the adaptive dampers are worth the splurge, but we’d stick with the standard steering over the variable gear rack. Do that and you’ve got yourself a nicely balanced car with a reasonably supple ride that is fun to drive, grippy and doesn’t fall apart when pushed. The saloon’s Sport, Modern, Luxury and M Sport trim packages are also available here in addition to the basic ES and posher SE variants.
The latest 3-series is our favourite junior exec, and on this showing, the handsome, roomy Touring version is now our favourite Three. Mated with the super-frugal 20d engine, it has to be one of the best cars currently on sale. The verdict: five stars.
Add your comment
Sign in You must be signed in to submit a comment.
BMW 328i Touring (2012) CAR review
Subject
Your comment
By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions
Cancel
You must be logged in to subscribe to a topic
Login or register now
Brand0 says
RE: BMW 328i Touring (2012) CAR review
@COMMENT8 - You do make me laugh. Either you don't know how funny you are OR you take particular pleasure in winding these guys up. I reckon it's the first one and that you truly believe you are correct and factual in everything that you write, rather than humbly accept its no more than just another opinion worth no more (or less) than anyone elses. A more balanced Premium market? - How do you quantify 'more balanced' in a way that isn't based on one's own views and prejudices? Serbian football fans probably think they have a balanced approach to race relations! Besides, is it Aussies or market that is more balanced... "A more rigorous motoring press" - This is entirely subjective and smacks of your love affair with Down Under tinting your glasses a different shade to mine - and there's nowt wrong with that, as long as you realise. When I lived in France and read French motoring magazines, they seemed pretty much in line with magazines from the UK and US (with the typical bias toward PSA products - they though the 607 was a leftfield E-Class). If your Aussie mags have a trend that is not shared, wouldn't logic dictate some kind of issue there? You do try to put across a logical persona - seems a bit at odds to me. Different doesn't mean better. France similalrly tinted my glasses. I thought their cheeses were the best, but a bit of quality Stilton smashes them all! The cheese always seems to taste sweeter if consumed in it's place of origin. I had the best Jerk chicken in Jamaica too! "“Best” depends on what you read and where you read it." - If reading is the only source of an opinion of whats best - which it is not of course - why would that phrase not apply to you?" I think I'm the best contributer on these forums. I reckon you do too! And you, and you, and you too....
@COMMENT8 - You do make me laugh. Either you don't know how funny you are OR you take particular pleasure in winding these guys up. I reckon it's the first one and that you truly believe you are correct and factual in everything that you write, rather than humbly accept its no more than just another opinion worth no more (or less) than anyone elses.
A more balanced Premium market? - How do you quantify 'more balanced' in a way that isn't based on one's own views and prejudices? Serbian football fans probably think they have a balanced approach to race relations! Besides, is it Aussies or market that is more balanced...
"A more rigorous motoring press" - This is entirely subjective and smacks of your love affair with Down Under tinting your glasses a different shade to mine - and there's nowt wrong with that, as long as you realise. When I lived in France and read French motoring magazines, they seemed pretty much in line with magazines from the UK and US (with the typical bias toward PSA products - they though the 607 was a leftfield E-Class). If your Aussie mags have a trend that is not shared, wouldn't logic dictate some kind of issue there? You do try to put across a logical persona - seems a bit at odds to me. Different doesn't mean better. France similalrly tinted my glasses. I thought their cheeses were the best, but a bit of quality Stilton smashes them all! The cheese always seems to taste sweeter if consumed in it's place of origin. I had the best Jerk chicken in Jamaica too!
"“Best” depends on what you read and where you read it." - If reading is the only source of an opinion of whats best - which it is not of course - why would that phrase not apply to you?" I think I'm the best contributer on these forums. I reckon you do too! And you, and you, and you too....
17 October 2012 14:18
comment8 says
CAR 24 October 2011 “Munich made an eleventh hour decision not to use the 4-series moniker for 2006’s E92, fearing a perceived weakening of its core model’s market position and lower sales numbers” It would seem from this little nugget than BMWs own sales tallies run through numbered series.
CAR 24 October 2011
“Munich made an eleventh hour decision not to use the 4-series moniker for 2006’s E92, fearing a perceived weakening of its core model’s market position and lower sales numbers”
It would seem from this little nugget than BMWs own sales tallies run through numbered series.
17 October 2012 03:26
AnthonySoprano says
@Comment8 "Most reasonable people would think that E36, E46 and E90 are food additives for goodness sake. " The readers of this site know perfectly well what they mean, given that this is a site about cars. "The 3 remains BMWs best selling model but as the data shows it does sell in considerably smaller numbers." That is nonsense, as has been pointed out below. You are welcome to your own opinions, but not your own facts. "Repeating the same argument does not give it any further merit." Well, your own comments below are premised on non-facts, and yet you keep repeating them. So I would have to agree with you on that one.
@Comment8
"Most reasonable people would think that E36, E46 and E90 are food additives for goodness sake. "
The readers of this site know perfectly well what they mean, given that this is a site about cars.
"The 3 remains BMWs best selling model but as the data shows it does sell in considerably smaller numbers."
That is nonsense, as has been pointed out below. You are welcome to your own opinions, but not your own facts.
"Repeating the same argument does not give it any further merit."
Well, your own comments below are premised on non-facts, and yet you keep repeating them. So I would have to agree with you on that one.
17 October 2012 01:36
@as – Most reasonable people would think that E36, E46 and E90 are food additives for goodness sake. Repeating the same argument does not give it any further merit. @Brando if your father had started downsizing from a 5 it is possible that the may have done so via a 3? The 3 remains BMWs best selling model but as the data shows it does sell in considerably smaller numbers. In contrast Mercedes are selling more C-classes in the UK than they did 10 years ago - outselling the 3 in the crucial September figures – not bad for a mid-cycle model up against the new 3. Your problem with Lexus is yours to own - you are not alone - as least in Europe. A move from the UK to Australia where the Japanese have long dominated the market has given me a fresh perspective on motoring matters. A more rigorous motoring press and a more evenly balanced “premium” market means a Lexus would always appear in a group test and is capable of beating the opposition on its merits. “Best” depends on what you read and where you read it. The 159 by the way has only recently gone off sale in Oz and does not suffer from the depreciation that is does in the UK. So called “premium” cars are a lot more expensive here with a Luxury Car Tax so the diminution in quality is more stark given the prices charged. In contrast to your polite invite to bugger off to Classiccar.com, I am very interested in the future of cars. An electric car would suit my city bound lifestyle quite well but currently there is no subsidy here and they are thus expensive. I think that a revolution in the ownership model is required – buy miles rather than a fixed model and enjoy petrol or electric miles as suits your needs. Perhaps in 10 years time your question will be redundant because I will not own a car but simply a simply a mobility plan. As to the past, a decent riding car is a victim of fashion not an inability to engineer as such. Much of the fashion could be attributed to the ascendancy of the “ultimate driving machine” . Your view of the best does not extend to a decent ride, only a decent steer.
@as – Most reasonable people would think that E36, E46 and E90 are food additives for goodness sake. Repeating the same argument does not give it any further merit.
@Brando if your father had started downsizing from a 5 it is possible that the may have done so via a 3? The 3 remains BMWs best selling model but as the data shows it does sell in considerably smaller numbers. In contrast Mercedes are selling more C-classes in the UK than they did 10 years ago - outselling the 3 in the crucial September figures – not bad for a mid-cycle model up against the new 3. Your problem with Lexus is yours to own - you are not alone - as least in Europe. A move from the UK to Australia where the Japanese have long dominated the market has given me a fresh perspective on motoring matters. A more rigorous motoring press and a more evenly balanced “premium” market means a Lexus would always appear in a group test and is capable of beating the opposition on its merits. “Best” depends on what you read and where you read it. The 159 by the way has only recently gone off sale in Oz and does not suffer from the depreciation that is does in the UK. So called “premium” cars are a lot more expensive here with a Luxury Car Tax so the diminution in quality is more stark given the prices charged. In contrast to your polite invite to bugger off to Classiccar.com, I am very interested in the future of cars. An electric car would suit my city bound lifestyle quite well but currently there is no subsidy here and they are thus expensive. I think that a revolution in the ownership model is required – buy miles rather than a fixed model and enjoy petrol or electric miles as suits your needs. Perhaps in 10 years time your question will be redundant because I will not own a car but simply a simply a mobility plan. As to the past, a decent riding car is a victim of fashion not an inability to engineer as such. Much of the fashion could be attributed to the ascendancy of the “ultimate driving machine” . Your view of the best does not extend to a decent ride, only a decent steer.
16 October 2012 15:16
Correction - you went with the Lexus didn't you COMMENT8. Ignore the early drivel if you like. Mind you, I find it a bit of a contradiction that you'd go for the premium car giving best value rather than just the best premium car. In fact, I have a reall problem with the Lexus brand in general anyway and feel that had they not called it a Lexus, the US would not have been sucked in enough to support the brand. Very clever name which is the perfect fit for the North Americans. I am rambling again.
16 October 2012 13:23
Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.
Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)
Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.