
Si70
says
RE: Chevrolet Epica 2.0D LS driven
What a half-hearted effort of an article. From the 'you don't really care about this, do you?' tone of the first paragraph, to the clunky prose of 'At least the ride is loping, and surprisingly well damped. At least the engine is nice. A straight-six hum is so much nicer than a V6', it feels like the writer just couldn't be bothered. Certain sections of the article make no sense whatsoever, it reads as though the ‘lurch when chucked into the first corner’ counters the ‘tight foot space’ in the rear; really? Lastly, if the Epica really is ‘not a good car by any stretch of the imagination’, why did it get at least a 3/5 rating for everything other than performance?
15 May 2008 17:25