Skip to content
Chevrolet models, news & reviews
3
Handling
4
Performance
Usability
Feelgood factor
Readers' rating
By Tim Pollard
First Drives
30 November 2010 22:51
The new Chevrolet Orlando is Chevy's first foray into the mid-sized compact MPV market in Europe. CAR's just driven the Orlando people carrier in Spain to see how it compares with the new Ford C-Max, Renault Scenic, Vauxhall Zafira and their ilk. Read our first road test review of the new 2011 Orlando to see if it hits the spot.
The Orlando is a product of GM's Delta architecture. All new Chevys are being engineered for world sale, give or take a budget car for south America. So the Orlando seven-seat MPV is spun from the same box of bits as the Cruze C-segment car, or Vauxhall Astra for that matter.
It's an appealing proposition for the typical family buyer. The Orlando is a seven-seater MPV only - no five-seater will be offered - yet is priced from an attractive sounding £16,395 for a 1.8 petrol LS (diesels kick off at £17,645).
And wait until you hear the full Chevrolet after-care package: this thing comes with a five-year warranty, servicing, breakdown and MoT insurance cover. As standard. Just think about that for a moment, and you'll realise how Joe Bloggs will find that pretty tempting.
You'll only have to budget for fuel and insurance for 60 months. It's like Daewoo all over again.
While there's no arguing with the brilliant ownership package, the Chevrolet Orlando still presents something of an eyesore at first sight. Each to their own, and all that, but we didn't find its bluff lines and awkward proportions as convincing as many rivals' designs.
It's better inside, mind. The Orlando has five conventional doors, rather than the sliding doors favoured by the new Ford C-Max. Access is good to all three rows of seats, especially since the middle row tumbles 60:40 to allow you to step into the rearmost pair of pews.
As standard, all five rear seats in the Orlando tumble into the floor at the tug of a lever. Depending on how far back the front seats are slid, you may have to fiddle the headrests for a flush fold but you won't need a degree in advanced leverage to work the Orlando's pews.
Boot space is gigantic as a five-seater, shrinking to surprisingly weedy when configured as a seven-seater. But the good news is that even gangly adults like your 6ft 2in correspondent can sit comfortably in the third row.
This is an MPV, remember. So the milieu is important. The driving position is good and the ambience inside a reminder just how far Chevrolet has come. It's easily on a par with a Zafira's cabin: switchgear is logically laid out (and identical to Vauxhall's in many instances), the degree of seat and wheel adjustment is generous and apart from a whopping D-pillar blindspot, the Orlando is not at all intimidating to drive. Moreover, the materials and build quality are fine.
We tested the 2.0-litre diesel, which will be the most popular UK seller. It'll come in 128bhp or 161bhp trims, and we drove the higher powered derv. Performance is lively enough for what is a heavy car, but watch out for the tall gearing, which has the four-pot spinning over at a barely awake 1500rpm at 60mph. On the M-way, you'll change down from sixth.
Lazy gearing aside, the Orlando is an accomplished all-rounder. Ours was in the inevitable media-spec top LTZ trim with the optional £2000 Exec Pack, which adds 18in rims, full leather, sat-nav and heated front seats. The good news is it rode really quite well, with a plump quality even on the outsized alloys; there's some patter at motorway speeds, but it absorbs most corrugations.
The Orlando can be hustled along, but let's face it few buyers will drive like that. Of rather more importance is the quiet refinement, the light steering and the little touches to ease family life on the road: an extra rear-view mirror for monster patrol, and a clever pop-up stereo panel to plug in and hide MP3 players behind the radio panel.
Chevrolet knows which side its bread is buttered. The Orlando is good, simple family fodder. It doesn't pretend to be anything more, and the accent is firmly on good value and no-nonsense practical virtues.
Even base models come with stability control, air-con, electric windows and mirrors, remote locking, tinted windows and more sockets than you'll have phones to plug in. Add in the unrivalled aftercare package, and many buyers will be thrilled.
But Chevrolet still has to overcome brand snobbery. And those bluff, Atlantic looks will hardly help endear the Orlando to European sensibilities.
Ultimately, what holds back the Orlando from a near-four-star rating is the equally well priced competition: a seven-seat C4 Grand Picasso starts at £17,745 a Renault Grand Scenic £16,970, while Ford's new Grand C-Max kicks off at £18,745. The old 'Daewoo legacy' Chevrolets used to be priced 20-25% below the competition, but the newest models have crept up in cost.
Take your pick between sharper dynamics, lower CO2 and more cutting edge engines; but for many buyers, the Chevy's killer spec and price advantage will outweigh such considerations. They won't be disappointed by the Orlando one jot.
Add your comment
Sign in You must be signed in to submit a comment.
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 VCDi LTZ (2010) CAR review
Subject
Your comment
By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions
Cancel
You must be logged in to subscribe to a topic
Login or register now
graham1792 says
Re: Chevrolet Orlando (2010) CAR review
I liked it enough to order one. It has presence on the road, good handling characteristics and reasonable economy. Buying a car is a very singular and personal thing, especially for men but it is ultimately your choice. You should never buy what you don't want. Your choice.
I liked it enough to order one. It has presence on the road, good handling characteristics and reasonable economy.
Buying a car is a very singular and personal thing, especially for men but it is ultimately your choice. You should never buy what you don't want.
Your choice.
28 November 2011 20:24
swedgeman says
RE: Chevrolet Orlando 2.0 VCDi LTZ (2010) CAR review
Just been looking at an MPV....we looked at all the major brands and then stopped by the Chevvy dealer to see what they had. We were pleasantly suprised. Congrats to Chevvy for breaking the mold of MPV`s..this is a great attempt to produce an MPV that does not look like an MPV. Like most cars it is difficult to appreciate their form unless you see them in the flesh..so don`t judge from a few photos in a car mag review. We have decided to go for the 2.0D mid spec which has a lot of kit, goes great, is between the size of the Grand C max and the S max but costs considerably less for more kit. What is more it is different from everything else out there on the road. We will get the car in 4 weeks so i will post a long term review at a later date.
13 February 2011 15:39
muchdrama says
I can honestly say I'd kill to get such a miserly mid-sized MPV here in the States. We have to make due with the Rondo, which is just too small.
09 December 2010 16:42
UrbanNomad says
Strangely I like the look of the Orlando, being a Qashqai owner and fan of Cross-Over styling it impresses. The angular lines are welcome as more cars are designed solely for increased aerodynamics to improve fuel efficiency. It also adds masculinity to MPV design although the rear skid plate and chrome tail gate treatment is a step too far! In a nice dark metallic it would look imposing, yet remaining a decent size. Should appeal to families and also single sporty types, who want something big enough to take their mountain bikes. This is the car Nissan's X-Trail should have been, as opposed to the current dumpy looking model. a good effort, will wait to see more road test reviews, but could be a potential Qashqai replacement.
Strangely I like the look of the Orlando, being a Qashqai owner and fan of Cross-Over styling it impresses. The angular lines are welcome as more cars are designed solely for increased aerodynamics to improve fuel efficiency. It also adds masculinity to MPV design although the rear skid plate and chrome tail gate treatment is a step too far! In a nice dark metallic it would look imposing, yet remaining a decent size.
Should appeal to families and also single sporty types, who want something big enough to take their mountain bikes. This is the car Nissan's X-Trail should have been, as opposed to the current dumpy looking model. a good effort, will wait to see more road test reviews, but could be a potential Qashqai replacement.
04 December 2010 16:54
car4mh says
I like the look of the Orlando, although it helps I'm partial to 'bluff, Atlantic looks', and Korean food . The GMC Granite concept from the last Detroit motor show did an even better job of the boxy van looks, and didn't have to suffer that odd split-level Chevy grille, but never mind. If Chevrolets are getting better and sharing GM tech with their European cousins, as well as no longer being bargain-priced then what's the point of Opel/Vauxhall? Can the GM Europe range be successfully positioned upmarket of Chevrolet as it appears VW have done relative to Skoda/Seat?
I like the look of the Orlando, although it helps I'm partial to 'bluff, Atlantic looks', and Korean food . The GMC Granite concept from the last Detroit motor show did an even better job of the boxy van looks, and didn't have to suffer that odd split-level Chevy grille, but never mind.
If Chevrolets are getting better and sharing GM tech with their European cousins, as well as no longer being bargain-priced then what's the point of Opel/Vauxhall? Can the GM Europe range be successfully positioned upmarket of Chevrolet as it appears VW have done relative to Skoda/Seat?
03 December 2010 22:45
Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.
Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)
Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.