Skip to content
Fiat models, news & reviews
4
Handling
3
Performance
Usability
Feelgood factor
Readers' rating
By Greg Fountain
First Drives
18 January 2011 08:03
The Fiat 500 TwinAir is a fascinating prospect. This is the point where Fiat’s kitsch reworking of its iconic 1950s city car elevates itself to a new level of 21st century relevance.
The TwinAir engine tested here is, according to Fiat, ‘the greenest petrol engine in the world’, yet it features no batteries, EV trickery or hybrid drivetrain. It’s just a highly efficient, low-friction, lightweight 875cc petrol engine with two cylinders and a turbocharger. We are not expecting it to be quick. But can we live with it?
Do you know, it isn’t. There’s 85bhp to play with and, much more relevantly, 107lb ft of torque from just 1900rpm, so when you’re buzzing around in town you never find a lack of urge.
‘Buzzing’ is the operative word, as the engine has a highly distinctive note – a kind of V8 burble pitched three octaves too high. It’s highly appealing, characterful and not at all intrusive. I haven’t driven the twin-pot 1957 Fiat 500, but I’ll wager it sounded a bit like this. And that’s a good thing. It suits the car.
The car is a function of its gearbox – a five-speed manual with highly specific ratios. The first two gears are incredibly short, but you’ll need to use them all the time to keep momentum, even resorting to first when rolling up to a roundabout. But third is magnificently long-legged, and allows you to do nearly all your town driving without further up-stirring. A 70mph cruise on a dual-carriageway feels comfortable, but a slight incline will have you reaching for fourth.
The gearchange is rubbery and imprecise, but the column-mounted stick is fun to hold and bully. It feels like driving an old car, but in a good way.
Top speed of the Fiat 500 TwinAir stands at 107mph and 0-62mph takes 11sec. But we'd say that's like your watch’s ability to be waterproof to 50 metres – you won’t need to test it.
The TwinAir produces just 95g/km CO2 and claims 68.9mpg. Truly sobering figures. There are further efficiencies in its light weight (13kg lighter than the FIRE 1.4 unit), its small size (23% shorter) and the fact that it can run unthrottled, reducing pumping losses by 10%.
It also features a stop/start system that works pretty well, and has an Eco button which completely changes the engine mapping, moving the torque curve further down the rev range to keep the engine running at its most efficient more of the time.
Good fun, in a slightly hapless sort of way. The ride is not bad, but secondary ride has its hands full when speed bumps and potholes kick in, and the steering is ridiculously light, even before you hit the Eco button to make it even lighter. It’s quite noisy, but not annoyingly so, and there’s plenty of grip if you can put up with some impressive body roll long enough to find out. Of course it understeers, but you’ll never be going fast enough for it to matter.
The Fiat 500 is bigger inside than you might think – you notice the narrowness more than any lack of height or legroom. The footwell is cramped, and a certain upper-body bendiness is needed to grab the seatbelt from behind you, but these are details. The body-coloured cabin plastics have the cheerful feel of an Action Man/Cindy doll car, and the off-white controls ape that Apple chic without feeling pretentious. And the boot’s pretty big, actually.
The dog-tooth check cloth of the seats really brightens the place up, and the seats themselves are as supportive as you could possibly hope. But the lack of reach adjustment for the steering wheel means the damn thing is anchored too far away.
Firstly, you get no brownie points from bearded people because there’s no TwinAir badging to thrill them. So it’s no big statement. But in three-door Pop spec it’s an Italian Job-style steal at £10,665.
Upgrade to Lounge spec and it’s still no hardship at £12,065. Ford’s able but less clever Ka tends to be a bit cheaper (£10,245 for a nice Titanium 1.2) and Nissan want £12,095 for a Tekna-spec 1.2 Micra. But both are thirstier and dirtier, and neither makes you laugh like this Fiat.
Add your comment
Sign in You must be signed in to submit a comment.
Fiat 500 Twinair (2011) CAR review
Subject
Your comment
By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions
Cancel
You must be logged in to subscribe to a topic
Login or register now
Nicky says
Re: Fiat 500 Twinair (2011) CAR review
Has anyone else been infuriated, as I have, with the gear shift indication flashing inappropiately in the center of the dash. Not only is it extremely irritating but distracting and I think dangerous. I am highly dissappointed with the my new Fiat 500 and I don't think I an be the only person who hates this "eccomony feature"
21 September 2011 11:49
Pedro says
RE: Fiat 500 Twinair (2011) CAR review
Sorry to show Nerdish tendencies, but I think the dimensions of a Golf GTi have snuck in to this report. Either that or the 500 does a great job of hiding its bulk.
26 May 2011 05:45
john160251 says
This is my first new car and in many ways I am delighted. My last was a second-hand Ford Ka, and in terms of style that was an amorphous piece of plastic compared to the beauty of the Fiat. I am disappointed in the gearing. The Ford was intelligently geared for city driving, so that one could come down as low as 20mph in 4th and stay in 3rd for almost everything else. As the reviewer remarks, sometimes the Fiat 500 cannot handle slow manoeuvres even in 2nd, and that is a serious disadvantage in a city of speed bumps like London. This alone would be enough reason for me not to buy this car again, so I hope Fiat reconsider when they produce the next series. On the subject of speed bumps: there are various points in Westminster where the Fiat does not quite clear the centre rise - fortunately I was driving extremely slowly when I found this out. I have let both Westminster and Fiat know! Meanwhile I would advise drivers to avoid straddling the bumps but to go between where possible.
This is my first new car and in many ways I am delighted. My last was a second-hand Ford Ka, and in terms of style that was an amorphous piece of plastic compared to the beauty of the Fiat.
I am disappointed in the gearing. The Ford was intelligently geared for city driving, so that one could come down as low as 20mph in 4th and stay in 3rd for almost everything else. As the reviewer remarks, sometimes the Fiat 500 cannot handle slow manoeuvres even in 2nd, and that is a serious disadvantage in a city of speed bumps like London. This alone would be enough reason for me not to buy this car again, so I hope Fiat reconsider when they produce the next series.
On the subject of speed bumps: there are various points in Westminster where the Fiat does not quite clear the centre rise - fortunately I was driving extremely slowly when I found this out. I have let both Westminster and Fiat know! Meanwhile I would advise drivers to avoid straddling the bumps but to go between where possible.
04 May 2011 08:09
Suzie says
According to Fiat500 Reviews, this is one of the most interesting, desirable, charming, best value, fun city car. Fiat's got the basics of its modern Cinquecento absolutely right - it earns a rare five stars. It offers the best security and fuel efficency features.
20 April 2011 06:03
shiftright says
@anonymous: I'd like to see your 2002 crash against a modern 500. You would see why the 500 weighs more.
03 February 2011 10:40
Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.
Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)
Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.