Skip to content

First Drives

Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi CAR review

By Adam Towler

09 April 2008 09:16

The Kuga's rivals are nearly collecting their goody bags at the small crossover party, but Ford is only just arriving in its new designer suit. Has the Blue Oval missed the boat? The market might still be growing, but Ford risks being unfashionably late in this overcrowded segment. We've driven the Kuga to find out the answer.

That Iosis X concept was attractive: is the Kuga anything like it?

Sadly, if predictably, the Kuga loses the rakish dynamism of the concept, but although its form is now generic crossover, the more you look at it, the tidier it looks. It’s details like the clever interplay of adjacent surfaces down the flanks; the sharply defined bone line that runs across the tailgate splitting the rear lights; and the successful integration of the family face (take note Peugeot) that gives the Kuga polish.

The gaping mouth grille and bonnet ridges suggest moderate menace, but obviously, the relatively small proportions mean you can’t take it too seriously. It might look threatening to a toddler in a supermarket car park, but it’ll be no Cayenne Turbo in the outside lane of the M4.

How about inside?

Solid, mature, cleanly styled, clearly arranged, but not overly exciting. Think generic Focus-alike cabin. Zetec models get a choice of either bright blue or orange trim at strategic points around the cabin, but the Titanium model we’ve driven offers a more restrained environment, albeit well finished.

But Ford has really nailed the ergonomic basics with the Kuga with a good driving position and the vision benefits of sitting higher than in a conventional family car. It’s a comfortable place to consume miles, front or back, but there are few practicality gimmicks – just some fold-flat seats and a split tailgate.

Click Thumbnails to Enlarge

Statistics

How much? £22,500
On sale in the UK: May 2008
Engine: 4cyl turbodiesel, 1997cc, 134bhp @ 4000rpm, 236lb ft @ 2000rpm
Transmission: 6-speed manual, four-wheel drive
Performance: 0-62mph 10.7sec, 112mph
How heavy / made of? 1613kg/steel
How big (length/width/height in mm)? 4443/1842/1710
Need to know

CAR's rating

Rated 4 out of 5

Handling

Rated 4 out of 5

Performance

Rated 3 out of 5

Usability

Rated 4 out of 5

Feelgood factor

Rated 4 out of 5

Readers' rating

Rated 3.5 out of 5

Page

Rate this article...

Average rating: Rated 3.5 out of 5 (29 votes)

Discuss this

Add your comment

Ford Kuga 2.0 TDCi CAR review

Subject

Your comment

By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions

Cancel

Si70

reward badge

Si70 says

More poised ..

.. ah, AReader, a more agile, accomplished posting might not be appreciated by everybody, or strictly necessary, but it can bring satisfaction and, maybe, longer term benefits.

12 April 2008 11:47

AReader

reward badge

AReader says

NVH

Thanks for your comments Si70. I'm realizing I did ride a little harshly over this one, and my handling could have been better balanced. I guess I'm more Mustang than Puma sometimes! Time to change my Focus, and think about upgrading my architecture after all :) That's what blogging is really for..... I love this site!

11 April 2008 02:04

Si70

reward badge

Si70 says

A bit of balance ..

.. I think AReader might have been a bit harsh on 90s Ford: granted the Cougar was a US biased makeover of the Mazda MX-6 and not a huge success; but at a similar time Ford gave us the Ka, well before the fashion for city cars took off and still selling well 12 years on and the Focus may have been more sophisticated than most drivers needed, but hardly a failure. If anything it was Ford's attempts at 4x4s in the 90s and 00s that were the disasters. Does anybody look back fondly on the Nissan Terrano based Maverick, or its later Mazda Tribute based cousin? and as for importing the Explorer to Europe ... Yes the Kuga is (fashionably) late to the party, but so are the VW Tiguan, Renault Kelos and Vauxhall Antara and Peugeot/Citroen and Fiat still aren't there yet. Let’s hope the profits from Kuga sales can support a 40th anniversary Carpi.

10 April 2008 21:28

Gmbh

reward badge

Gmbh says

zzzzzz

Yet another 4x4. Complete with stupidly spelt name. The rear lights look a little too similar to the VW Tiguans' for my liking too.

10 April 2008 13:28

Batty

reward badge

Batty says

Excuse me?

This must look much better in the metal than in these photographs. To me this looks like the worst of the "kinetic" design forms. I'd much prefer the new look of the Volvo XC60. And while goatboy bemoans the lack of handling in SUV's, most buyers don't care. Manufacturers manufacture for profit, full stop. Those with the biggest profits win (eg Toyota).

10 April 2008 02:48

Become a CAR contributor

Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.

Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)