Skip to content
Honda models, news & reviews
4
Handling
3
Performance
Usability
Feelgood factor
Readers' rating
3.5
By Steve Moody
First Drives
07 April 2008 00:00
Honda’s European-spec Accord has never really succeeded. It’s always been a humdrum family saloon with a mainstream badge, but with premium pretensions. So what to do with the new Accord? Give it a radical remake like the Civic and attract a fashion-conscious crowd? Or up the price, the kit count, and give it same-again looks? It’s the latter that Honda has gone for, but with Ford’s Mondeo offering quality to match the Germans, and a brilliant driving experience, is this a step too far for Honda and the Accord?
To meet its goals Honda engineers benchmarked BMW for ride, handling and engines, Lexus for technology and Audi for quality and consistency. Sounds familiar to us.
Taking on the German attitude of styling evolution, rather than the usual Japanese approach of revolution, at first glance the new Accord’s proportions are almost too familiar. But it is significantly wider and slightly lower than its predecessor, and the subtleties of the changes become more obvious as you look at it: creases heading in seemingly conflicting directions, while the long front lights and wide grille create a sharp look.
The key engine, to appeal to the corporate market Honda is so desperate to break into, is the new 2.2-litre i-DTEC diesel, using the latest piezoelectric multi-stage fuel injection technology, more efficient exhaust gas recirculation and a particulate filter for reduced emissions.
Power (147bhp) and torque (258lb ft) have been increased, while there will be a much needed higher power version later. You can’t go up against the premium boys without power and performance.
Add your comment
Sign in You must be signed in to submit a comment.
Honda Accord 2.2 i-DTEC (2008) CAR review
Subject
Your comment
By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions
Cancel
You must be logged in to subscribe to a topic
Login or register now
car4mh says
RE: Honda Accord 2.2 i-DTEC CAR review
The 'latest comments' widget has brought back the Accord - thanks princehussy, and I hope you enjoy your new EX! - so what the heck, let's have a talk about the Accord, and market stereotypes. In Australasia, as kayjaynz pointed out, the Accord Euro (as it's known here) is highly-regarded and competes with the Subaru Legacy and Mazda 6 (if not the Mondeo, which rules the sector but sells to fleets) for private buyers in the midsize sector. It is competitively priced and thanks to Honda NZ's fixed pricing plan, holds residuals well. The european orthodoxy have priced themselves out of the market and become difficult to justify in comparison for new-car buyers on a reasonable budget. A new BMW is a prestige car here, still. In North America, the Accord is the Acura TSX, and praised as a compact executive sports sedan. Americans would consider the car a rival to a 3-series, along with the Infiniti G-series and now even the Hyundai Genesis. The US Accord is what we in Australasia call the Accord V6, a larger vehicle designed for US market supremacy against the Camry. In Europe's crowded midsize sector, where previously-exclusive brands rub shoulders with the mass-market nameplates you seem to get a Honda which the UK division has put at an Acura-style position without the differentiated branding. UK stereotyping of Honda as an OAP car turns off buyers considering an alternative, the pricing puts it into 3-series territory which is perceived as the gold standard in the sector at the moment, no questions asked. Problem. Remarkably, it's the same car in all 3 regions, bar some minor adjustments to spec, trim or badging. How many years and what type of vehicles will it take for Honda to break out of this stereotype ghetto in CAR's home market? Is it a matter of product, price or psychology? There's a topic to consider, instead of the formulaic 'how far is it from being worthy of comparison with the 3-series?' angle.
The 'latest comments' widget has brought back the Accord - thanks princehussy, and I hope you enjoy your new EX! - so what the heck, let's have a talk about the Accord, and market stereotypes.
In Australasia, as kayjaynz pointed out, the Accord Euro (as it's known here) is highly-regarded and competes with the Subaru Legacy and Mazda 6 (if not the Mondeo, which rules the sector but sells to fleets) for private buyers in the midsize sector. It is competitively priced and thanks to Honda NZ's fixed pricing plan, holds residuals well. The european orthodoxy have priced themselves out of the market and become difficult to justify in comparison for new-car buyers on a reasonable budget. A new BMW is a prestige car here, still.
In North America, the Accord is the Acura TSX, and praised as a compact executive sports sedan. Americans would consider the car a rival to a 3-series, along with the Infiniti G-series and now even the Hyundai Genesis. The US Accord is what we in Australasia call the Accord V6, a larger vehicle designed for US market supremacy against the Camry.
In Europe's crowded midsize sector, where previously-exclusive brands rub shoulders with the mass-market nameplates you seem to get a Honda which the UK division has put at an Acura-style position without the differentiated branding. UK stereotyping of Honda as an OAP car turns off buyers considering an alternative, the pricing puts it into 3-series territory which is perceived as the gold standard in the sector at the moment, no questions asked. Problem.
Remarkably, it's the same car in all 3 regions, bar some minor adjustments to spec, trim or badging.
How many years and what type of vehicles will it take for Honda to break out of this stereotype ghetto in CAR's home market? Is it a matter of product, price or psychology? There's a topic to consider, instead of the formulaic 'how far is it from being worthy of comparison with the 3-series?' angle.
29 August 2009 07:29
princehussy says
peeps... dont hate... appreciate. The styling of this car is subtle and simple yet so funky, masculine and savage. theres no other car design like this. I would pick this over any bmw, merc or audi. loving this car... will be getting one soon, EX with all the extras baby
peeps... dont hate... appreciate.
The styling of this car is subtle and simple yet so funky, masculine and savage. theres no other car design like this. I would pick this over any bmw, merc or audi.
loving this car... will be getting one soon, EX with all the extras baby
29 August 2009 04:28
cattleman45 says
I went to a showroom near Colchester UK to investigate with my family.The front seats are incredibly comfy and the back ones are also good. The car has real quality. We were all very impressed with the car. I would much rather have this car than the breed of giant competitors. It is much easier to park in tight spaces.It also holds good residuals. They sell it now with an automatic diesel (It has a torque converter).
30 January 2009 00:14
kkirkou says
I'd buy one
Why don't they put the crazy engine from the Civic type R? And isn't time for a new Subaru Legacy? They would be the duo that would really deserve to take us away from Audis and BMWs because they would offer as much as the Germans plus reliability.
11 April 2008 21:04
JohnnyBimmer says
Grandpa Kev
I totally disagree with the view it "looks like the old car with an after market kit". It's crystal clear Honda knows its market and has spotted a trend in the grey haired crowd that attended a recent customer clinic that Grandpa wants to re-live his youth and get into the new young trend for Max-Powering customisation. This is the perfect model for Grandpa to go cruising before bedtime and a cup of Horlicks. Well done Honda. Just missed the purple flourescent light for the front and rear aprons on the options list!
11 April 2008 02:30
Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.
Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)
Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.