Skip to content

 
 

CAR Reviews

Click Thumbnails to Enlarge

Statistics

How much? £24,495
On sale in the UK: January 2012
Engine: 1798cc 16v 4-cyl, 140bhp @ 6500rpm, 128lb ft @ 4300rpm
Transmission: Six-speed manual, front-wheel drive
Performance: 9.6sec 0-62mph, 134mph, 46.3mpg, 145g/km CO2
How heavy / made of? 1487kg/steel
How big (length/width/height in mm)? 4300/2065/1470
Need to know

CAR's rating

Rated 3 out of 53

Handling

Rated 0 out of 50

Performance

Rated 0 out of 50

Usability

Rated 0 out of 50

Feelgood factor

Rated 0 out of 50

Readers' rating

Rated 3.5 out of 53.5

Honda Civic 1.8 iVTEC EX-GT (2011) CAR review

By Anthony ffrench-Constant

First Drives

02 November 2011 10:00

Honda is nothing if not attentive to its customers. This, allied to bullet-proof build quality, metronomic reliability and ironclad residuals, explains why so many of them keep coming back for more. So it’s hardly surprising that it was to its customers that Honda turned first when hatching this new, ninth generation Civic.

Five areas were identified for attention: the ‘polarising’ design, the compromised rear visibility, interior quality, noise insulation and ride comfort. So, in the context of the range-topping 1.8 iVTEC EX-GT specimen I drove, let’s tackle them in that order…

So how does the new Honda Civic look in the metal?

I need to declare my hand at the outset and admit that, hatched in 2006, the current Civic is, to my eye, the most cohesive piece of automotive couture to come out of Japan since the NSX. Indeed, a measure of just how hard an act to follow it is being that it still turns heads today with all the vim it did on day one.

Honda makes much of ‘harmonious design’ in the blurb appended to this, ninth generation Civic, but I can’t help feeling this 20mm lower and 10mm wider specimen lacks the clean, uncluttered homogeny of its predecessor.

The simple, full width band of glister that hallmarked the bows of the earlier car has now flowed south like sloppy cake icing to reveal areas of less than wholesome plastic, and the new airdam may be aerodynamically sound, but is a tad too chunky in the execution to look properly rakish.

In profile, pronounced wheel arch over-sculpting a la Nissan Juke gratuitously clutters what were once smooth flanks, and proves to be all too colour-sensitive –the blended Kermit Frankfurt showcar looking much more enthusiastic about life than the sombre dark metallic green affair I drove.

Astern, Honda has dug its toes in and stuck with the ‘compromised rear visibility’ provided by that irritating mid-screen bar, merely reinforcing its presence on the new model by hoisting the rear lamp clusters aloft to join it. They have, however, finally acceded to customer wishes and added a wiper to the upper screen. The bottom lip of the lower screen is now lower, but the mid rail appears to loom even larger in the rear view mirror now, and performs the neat trick of perfectly masking the indicators of tailing cars.

And inside the new Civic?

I don’t, frankly, recall there being much amiss with the interior quality of the current car, and what we have here smacks more of makeover than genuine improvement. The split level dashboard is a case in point; the only prominent addition being an upper level multi-information display screen which will tell you most of what’s happening on the centre console screen immediately adjacent to it, but won’t, irritatingly, tell you the remaining fuel range.

There’s bags of room in the back, and the Civic continues its dominance of the C-segment spaciousness stakes. All is beautifully screwed together, and fit and finish does seem to have taken yet another modest hike upwards.

The driving position’s fine, and the new steering wheel in smoother leather is a joy to hold. However, seat bottomed out, I sit higher than I’d like. This, I suspect, is to ensure the rim of the wheel falls neatly between upper and lower dashboard instruments.

So, to the driving experience...

Noise and ride quality are two of the big issues that Honda has attempted to address in the new Civic. In the case of the former, the car is undoubtedly more quiet overall, yet remains vaguely plagued by rather more road noise from the front tyres than is seemly. A pity.

The ride, meanwhile, is entirely schizophrenic; one minute supple, the next unsubtle, it baffles with a consistently inconsistent approach to each new road surface…

In most cases, the secondary ride delivers, with the worst of the nuggety stuff ironed out, despite that persistence of tyre noise. Yet the primary ride is not so clever... The car often lacks body control on anything but very even surfaces, floating too much over crests and generally shrugging and squirming in the manner of a gorilla forced to wear evening dress for the first time.

Overall, attendant to a perception of mildly over-tough springing and slightly sloppy damping, the new Civic delivers mere glimpses of a ride refinement promise that remains gently elusive.

And this is a shame, because the rest of the mechanicals deliver sublime consistency. The 1.8 litre engine, still a little tight on the sub-1000 miler I drove, promises everything we know a Honda VTEC can deliver, whilst the gear change is pretty much mechanical perfection and an utter joy to use.

Developing 140bhp at an amusing 6500rpm, yet maximum torque of just 128lb ft, the 1.8 litre engine must be prodded vigorously at all times to extract the oopmh, in best, rorty VTEC tradition. Bizarrely for a model branded GT, however, this top of the range specimen is a full half second slower to 62mph than lesser spec’ed 1.8 variants; a peculiarity that Honda puts down to extra weight of standard equipment.

The steering, with a quicker rack than previously, is slightly over-light at all times for my tastes, yet a paragon of utterly slack-free, linear accuracy. It is also almost entirely lacking in feel and feedback, and I’m reminded of David Blunkett’s guide dog; it’ll get you where you want to go every time, but never actually communicate anything whatsoever about the journey itself.

Verdict

Much like its ride, the Civic’s handling leaves me in two minds. On the one hand, a glimpse at the speedometer invariably flags a good 15mph more than guesstimated, suggesting somewhat more effortless cross-country progress than initially assumed. On the other, many’s the time I craved extra power coming out of a bend, because attempts to carry too much speed through a corner reward with nothing save the onset of entirely predictable understeer. Roll on the Type-R…

Priced from £16,495 to £26,595 and with a choice of 1.4 and 1.8 litre VTECs and 2.2 litre turbodiesel, there’s not a great deal not to like about the new Civic range. Trouble is, it has a particularly hard act to follow…

1

Rate this article...

Average rating: Rated 3.5 out of 53.5 (19 votes)

Discuss this

Add your comment

Honda Civic 1.8 iVTEC EX-GT (2011) CAR review

Subject

Your comment

By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions

Cancel

 

shand1967

shand1967 says

RE: Honda Civic 1.8 iVTEC EX-GT (2011) CAR review

@timbo65: I was thinking in terms of RS Renault tests against Golf GTi / Polo GTi / RS Focus etc, although I would concede that bog standard Renaults would not stand a chance against VW & Fords. However the new Astra is a very under-rated car and the it will be interesting to see how the new GTC fairs against the VW / Ford competition?

I seem to remember that in the 1990's, when Civics (and the Rover 45 cousin) came up against Golfs in road tests, the fact that the Golf had a crude beam axle rear end was never an issue? I sometimes wonder if this VW worship (akin to the current Apple religion) is more about style over substance? VW make perfectly good if boring cars, like a lot of companies! But at least the Mk VIII Civic looks a lot more interesting than the current Golf (and miles better than the current "Korean" looking Focus). The new Mk IX Civic does look a backward step in terms of exterior design, but at least it is distinctive?  

 

 

16 November 2011 19:27

 

bertandnairobi

reward badge

bertandnairobi says

RE: Honda Civic 1.8 iVTEC EX-GT (2011) CAR review

That last message isn´t clear. Are you saying the difference between the two iterations is not clear or that it is very clear indeed? There is much that´s carried over but the differences are unfortunately as plain as day. The more I look at it the more I see the upper body of one car dropped on the lower body of another. I really hate this version. It´s annoying me. The melting front graphics are also awful.

11 November 2011 13:36

 

ColinLambert

ColinLambert says

RE: Honda Civic 1.8 iVTEC EX-GT (2011) CAR review

HHHHM!

A blind man would be pleased to see the difference twixt the existing and the new.

They still have not done away with that ridiculous split rear screen which was one of the reasons I did not buy the existing one. (the other reason was the absolutely DREADFUL  'i-shift' gear box.

I presume the price quoted refers to the gold plated version. If not they certainly will not sell many!

Yet again a Honda cock up. What HAS happened to this once brilliant company!

11 November 2011 12:56

 

StevenQuas

reward badge

StevenQuas says

RE: Honda Civic 1.8 iVTEC EX-GT (2011) CAR review

Surely the price in the article is wrong?  Either that or Honda have made a serious mistake - this is mark 6 Golf GTI money which is a far superior car.

 

Steven Quas

Hamburg

10 November 2011 12:22

 

timbo65

reward badge

timbo65 says

RE: Honda Civic 1.8 iVTEC EX-GT (2011) CAR review

I too am very disapointed with this car, which apparently is just a thorough revemp of the current car (much like the Golf Mk VI was) rather than an all new car. Maybe that means we can expect a proper replacement within the next few years rather than a mere facelift!

 

@shand1967: I haven't noticed many Renaults (other than RS models which cost £1000's more) & Vauxhalls being praised for their road manners recently OR beating the Focus & Golf in road tests for that matter!!! Not sure which reviews you're reading? Multi link is simply a far more advanced rear suspension system which gives a better ride/handling compromise overall and there aren't many who would dispute that. But as you rightly say, not too many drivers in the real world are going to push their car to limits where they will notice any difference? 

 

@androo: crumbs I hadn't even noticed the price!!! Surely you have that wrong CAR, who in their right mind is going to pay nearly £25k for one of these????????

10 November 2011 11:35

Become a CAR contributor

Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.

Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)

CAR magazine June issue 611
Untitled Document

Become a CAR contributor

Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.