Skip to content
Hyundai models, news & reviews
3
Handling
Performance
Usability
Feelgood factor
Readers' rating
2.5
By Mark Hamilton
First Drives
10 March 2011 10:21
Whether you blame scrappage schemes or acclaim the Koreans' increasing engineering savvy, there's no denying that the Hyundai i10 is the UK's most popular small car, with nearly 24,000 sold here in 2010.
Hyundai has recently facelifted the i10, and added an eco-friendly Blue specification level to the range. The headline figures are 99g/km CO2 and 67.3mpg combined economy. Blue is short for BlueDrive, Hyundai's environmentally friendly technology set, but you can be Blue in any colour you like from the i10's palette of hues. CAR drove a white one.
The i10 Blue must be the most basic eco-spec car on sale today, retailing at £9195. Approaching the i10, you reach for the remote locking keyfob and find yourself plipperless. Deploying the key in the lock, you open your door to reveal a tidily-designed but basic grey 'n black, plastic 'n cloth interior, where door mirrors are adjusted by hand and the (non-folding) key goes in the ignition just like 20th-century cars did. Lay your palms on the plastic steering wheel and shift knob and reminisce about your favourite holiday rentacars of yesteryear.
It's not all austerity measures though, with a six-speaker, single-CD audio system offering the relevant ports for your MP3 player, air-conditioning and electric front windows. Instruments and console light up blue - perhaps a bit too brightly so in the case of the centre-console LCD display's backlighting, which can overwhelm the black text on the display and glows like a budget clock radio.
In the rear, you can squeeze three passengers across the back bench, but the middle inhabitant will be on intimate terms with their neighbours whether they wish to be or not. However, two passengers would find the i10's rear seating has enough headroom for six-footers, and is acceptable for legroom. In van-man mode the i10's seat
base tumbles forward and the flat-folded seatbacks yield 910 litres of utility space. The boot is just 225 litres in conventional configuration.
Hyundai's 998cc twin-cam, 4-valve 'Kappa' triple provides a modest 68bhp at a rather lofty 6800rpm, while 70lb ft of torque is served as a starter at 3500rpm. Revving it hard would sound like the best course of action, and is ably facilitated by the smooth five-speed manual transmission and light clutch action.
Around town, the i10 Blue plays nicely with other traffic, and deploys its automatic Intelligent Stop and Go (ISG) party-trick faultlessly during the course of our test. The engine sounds an enthusiastic three-cylinder thrum but doesn't overwhelm the audio, and the usual eco change-up indicator will have you amused by its optimism at times. Low-speed manouevrability is fine for parking and visibility is good for a modern NCAP-friendly bunker.
You won't be slaying repmobiles on the motorway, but wind and road noise suppression is better than we expected, and the i10's gearing puts the engine at peak torque in fifth gear cruising at 70mph. Select a suitably relaxing playlist on your MP3 player and remember to downshift before trying to pass lorries or tackling steep inclines.
On B-roads the i10 rides nicely enough on its 13-inch low rolling-resistance Hankooks, but those same tyres mean that you won't be seeking to part-ex your hot hatch at a local Hyundai dealer. Understeer is the order of the day, and that holy grail of steering feel is missing from the electrically-assisted steering.
However, the gearchange and aforementioned enthusiastic three-pot engine mean that a country drive in the i10 may raise a smile, and doesn't feel like undue punishment for an open-minded driver. ABS and (the optional £365) electronic stability control should take care of any back-roads over-exuberance, or loss of traction in inclement weather.
The Hyundai i10 exceeded our (admittedly low) expectations as good basic transport. There is a bit more to the little Korean car's current popularity than scrappage incentives and generous warranties.
Whether the i10 Blue is the right model for your needs is another matter. For congestion-charge avoidance and zero road tax the i10 Blue wins. But we can't help thinking that the standard 1.2-litre four, which still offers a low 108g/km of CO2 and 61.4mpg may be better.
You'll gain 17bhp, 19 lb ft, lop 2.6 seconds off the 0-62mph time, add 14-inch wheels and the convenience of remote central locking, and pay £400 less for better 'Active' spec. Or find £150 more for the top-of-the line i10 1.2 Style (the interior featured in our photo gallery).
Either way, Hyundai has a strong contender at the value-for-money end of the city car class.
Add your comment
Sign in You must be signed in to submit a comment.
Hyundai i10 Blue (2011) CAR review
Subject
Your comment
By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions
Cancel
You must be logged in to subscribe to a topic
Login or register now
greywarden says
RE: Hyundai i10 Blue (2011) CAR review
what ever they say about it i still want to get one just because of one factor which is the price. i was having second thoughts in getting one because of safety issues. the price and fuel efficiency is really tempting. but is this really true? 60mpg? kinda questionable for a car which is not a hybrid to make that kind of numbers or this is just for advertising purposes?
05 October 2011 06:18
Sam the Eagle says
should have read 'all so very 90's'. Stupid website.
12 March 2011 23:28
@georgios1976 Schreyer oversees KIA's styling, not Hyundai's - hence the difference. As for the rest, also very 90's, as you said.
@georgios1976
Schreyer oversees KIA's styling, not Hyundai's - hence the difference. As for the rest, also very 90's, as you said.
12 March 2011 23:27
georgios1976 says
@robinstp: Pandas won't rot, they are all galvanised these days. With regards to reliability, in UK at least JD Power rates it highly for its mechanical robustness, do not forget, the car is being assembled in the old eastern bloc, where people still take pride in their work. Do not get me wrong, the i10 has a lot to commend, but it also has a great deal of irritating faults that mark it down as an everyday proposition. On top of the early 90's style keyfob, I did not like the fact that you can lock the doors even though a door is still open, no trip computer, no panoramic sunroof, very noisy on the motorway, noisy engine too, you cannot have the radio on without the ignition on, you cannot read the mileage without the ignition on, the light stalk can be pushed away into full beam even though the lights are actually switched off (so when you switch the lights on they go into full beam blinding us all), boot is also very shallow, got 42mpg at 80 mph on UK motorways which I find low (Panda at similar speeds hits low 50s despite having a prehistoric 1.2 8v FIRE engine). On the other hand, car is well built, nice (but relatively heavy) steering feel, very good ride/handling setting, lots and lots and lots of equipment, low emissions and cheap price, but sadly, as is often the case, what you get is what you pay for. I'm a huge fan of Peter Shreyer, I'm sure the next i10 will be a far more convincing proposition, but as it stands now, I believe the Panda is still the best all-rounder. If there is something the Italians are good at, is minis and superminis. For anything bigger, shop elsewhere!
12 March 2011 21:26
fair point about the official consumption figures, but unless they run a long-term test, is there anything Car can do about it? That said, I agree they should be a bit more circumspect about those, and question them when they seem too far off. Actually an article about how those figures are calculated, and how manufacturers can manipulate them to their advantage would be great - without naming names obvioulsy. Probably not something a commercial operation like Car can do, but if anyone has access to reliable sources and are prepared to share, by all means please start a thread in the 'Green' section of the forum.
fair point about the official consumption figures, but unless they run a long-term test, is there anything Car can do about it? That said, I agree they should be a bit more circumspect about those, and question them when they seem too far off.
Actually an article about how those figures are calculated, and how manufacturers can manipulate them to their advantage would be great - without naming names obvioulsy. Probably not something a commercial operation like Car can do, but if anyone has access to reliable sources and are prepared to share, by all means please start a thread in the 'Green' section of the forum.
12 March 2011 21:02
Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.
Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)
Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.