Skip to content

 
 

CAR Reviews

Click Thumbnails to Enlarge

Statistics

How much? £97,000
On sale in the UK: Now
Engine: 5000cc 32v supercharged V8, 542bhp @ 6000-6500rpm, 501lb ft @ 2500-5500rpm
Transmission: Six-speed auto, rear-wheel drive
Performance: 4.2sec 0-62mph, 186mph, 292g/km, 23mpg
How heavy / made of? 1753kg, aluminium
How big (length/width/height in mm)? 4794/1892/1312mm
Need to know

CAR's rating

Rated 5 out of 55

Handling

Rated 5 out of 55

Performance

Rated 5 out of 55

Usability

Rated 5 out of 55

Feelgood factor

Rated 4 out of 54

Readers' rating

Rated 3.5 out of 53.5

Jaguar XKR-S (2011) CAR review

By Chris Chilton

First Drives

01 June 2011 00:01

The new XKR-S is Jag’s hottest XK yet, a 542bhp beast based on last year’s 75 anniversary special but with even more power. And this time it's got mouth as well as trousers.

The front end of the XKR-S features a pair of gaping nostrils delivering air to the supercharged V8, and a black mouth that gives it a very different look to the faux E-type nose found on other XKs. At the back there’s prominent hoop spoiler and part of a diffuser, although since it extends about a hair’s breadth under the car, it might be more for show than go.

So the new 2011 XKR-S is like Jag’s answer to a 911 GT3?

It’s probably better to think of it having some of the flavour of extremely focused cars like GT3, but still retaining a very Jaguar feel, and therefore a load more civility than the Porsche.

So while Jag has finally fitted some body-hugging Recaro chairs, you won’t find anything so grubby as a roll cage in there. Its closest rival would probably be Maserati’s new Granturismo-based MC Stradale.

How does it compare with a standard XKR?

By any normal standards the XKR is a great performance coupe. But this new XKR-S inherits some of the tricks first aired on last year’s 75 anniversary special to lift the R-S onto another plane dynamically, including  a very stiff aluminium front suspension upright. So the steering is more precise, incredibly alert and full of feel.

The body control is superb too, and not just on smooth roads. Throw in some bumps and the XKR-S barely notices, somehow managing to glide over them. A very acceptable pay-off is the noticeably knobblier low-speed ride, particularly since you also get 39bhp and 39lb ft more to play with than in the regular XKR.

If this thing’s got 550bhp, that makes it as powerful as the legendary XJ220 supercar!

Yup, but the XK’s a damn sight torquier - 501lb ft plays 476lb ft. And while the XJ220 was blighted by serious turbo lag, the R-S’s power is spread evenly and available instantly. It’s not much slower either.

The old timer hit 60mph in 4.0sec and 100mph in around 8.0sec; the new boy takes 4.2sec and 8.6sec. On top speed though, even the 186mph R-S has to give way to the two-decade old XJ220.

Sounds incredible. What’s not to like?

Virtually nothing. The back seats are a joke, the cabin didn’t feel particularly special five years ago when the XK cost £50k - and certainly feels out of its depth at double that price, although the carbon-look woven leather trim is very smart.

And the chassis isn’t perfect. With so much torque available at any point in the rev range, traction can become an issue on really wet roads.

Verdict

The Jaguar XKR-S is brilliant. It takes the already exciting and very capable XKR and creates an even more thrilling GT, one that would be just as happy thrashing round a circuit on the weekend as ferrying you through London traffic to work during the week.

If you are doing loads of trackdays, a 911 GT3 would still be more fun, although since production has finished, you’d need to find a used one or go for the much more hardcore, much more expensive GT3 RS 4.0.

That’s a very different kind of car though and nowhere near as broad in its talents as the Jag. And while the XKR-S’s £97,000 price is a bit of a shocker – it costs £20k more than an XKR - you’d certainly have to be steadfastly determined to have a set of Aston keys in your pocket before you spent another £80k on a DBS.

 

 

Get 3 issues of CAR magazine for £1 - Click here

1

Rate this article...

Average rating: Rated 3.5 out of 53.5 (46 votes)

Discuss this

Add your comment

Jaguar XKR-S (2011) CAR review

Subject

Your comment

By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions

Cancel

 

V12 Migaloo

reward badge

V12 Migaloo says

RE: Jaguar XKR-S (2011) CAR review

I dislike these comparisions with the 911, a car which to my mind is one of the best tools ever built.  A mate of bought a new 2010 4S cabrio and when I asked him why he didn't go for theJag he said that they were 2 completely different cars, in his opinion the comparision was the R8 and the 430 spider... Yes, I know the Jag and poker are both coupe's, alegedly with 4 seats but they are worlds apart.   The Porsche can't match the Jags GT ability as much as the Jags can match a 911's lap time.

The XKR-S really should be compared to the more expensive Aston (I dont know which one because I'm confused with all their cars looking alike) or the Meserati Grand Tourismo. Forget the, SL, 6 series M or even the RS5 as they are not even in the same league as either the Jag or the Porker, dispite similar price tags.

I'd love to have a XKR-S, I even love to have the standard XK.  I'd also love to have any 911, Aston and Maser as a matter of fact.

When cars reach this level of sophistication (and cost) I'm of the opinion (misguided perhaps) that you really can't go wrong, unless your down the pub copmparing figures with some bore who drives a Scooby....

06 June 2011 17:40

 

Batty

reward badgemoderatorstaff

Batty says

RE: Jaguar XKR-S (2011) CAR review

Hello Halfabee,

I like the Jaguar but there are simply too many racing 911's to ignore. That the Jaguar uses aluminium doesn't prove that they have used it effectively as it is a fairly hefty reading above. The engine position doesn't define the chassis capability however much it may influence its characteristics. Primarily the 911 was engineered as a sports car where the Jag is a saloon with a couple of doors missing.

06 June 2011 07:11

 

sab33

reward badge

sab33 says

RE: Jaguar XKR-S (2011) CAR review

stunning is all i could sayyyyyyyyyyyyyy

05 June 2011 06:27

 

MG5Sport

reward badge

MG5Sport says

RE: Jaguar XKR-S (2011) CAR review

Hallelujah, a Jaguar with five star quality. First five star Jaguar evvveeeer.

03 June 2011 20:32

 

Halfabee

reward badge

Halfabee says

RE: Jaguar XKR-S (2011) CAR review

@Batty - the 911 has a 'better chassis'? 

Jag - aluminium; Porsche - steel.  One up to Jag

Jag - mid-front engine; Porsche - rear engine, hanging out the back.  Two up to Jag.

I suppose it could be argued that Porsche had to engineer a good chassis to counter the fact that the engine is inconveniently located outside the wheelbase.

03 June 2011 15:36

Become a CAR contributor

Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.

Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)

CAR magazine June issue 611
Untitled Document

Become a CAR contributor

Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.