Skip to content
Jaguar models, news & reviews
4
Handling
Performance
5
Usability
Feelgood factor
Readers' rating
3
By Chris Chilton
First Drives
08 February 2012 10:00
This is the Jaguar XKR-S Convertible, a 542bhp drop-top with a £100,000-plus price.
No, but then the XKR-S coupe and GT3 are very different cars, whatever the Jag’s fighty face and mighty figures suggest. The Porsche is, was and always will be, a trackday car for the road, but the Jag is a GT car that happens to be quite handy on track.
Okay, so we didn’t drive it on track, but that’s the idea behind the XKR-S coupe, and the cabrio’s structure feels so tight and shake-free, we doubt it’d disgrace itself either. Jaguar’s engineers say that’s because the XK’s aluminium structure was designed as a cabrio as well as a coupe from the outset. There’s a 47kg weight penalty in the open car, but interestingly because that’s mostly located at the rear of the car, the cabrio’s weight distribution is actually better than the coupe’s.
Nope. The R-S cabrio’s spring rates are different and its adaptive dampers recalibrated, but only to cope with the extra weight. The aim was to deliver a car with the same character as the coupe, and they’ve certainly managed it. Body control is superb, and with various XKR-S-specific tweaks, including the super-stiff aluminium front suspension knuckle that first appeared on 2010’s 75th anniversary car, the steering is as direct as a Roman road, and full of feel, while remaining easy on the forearms.
In character, it’s very definitely a really sorted GT as opposed to a raw road racer, but it’s certainly more than capable enough to keep even track fiends happy. Well, in the dry, at least. In damp or wet conditions, the XKR-S really does struggle to make use of its power advantage over a regular XKR, lack of traction becoming an issue even with the clever active differential doing its best to find purchase.
The XKR-S produces 542bhp from its supercharged 5-litre V8, up from 503bhp in the standard XKR. But it’s the torque you notice, the torque that the back wheels struggle to contain. There’s 502lb ft of the stuff between 2500-5500rpm and when you can actually manage to deploy it, the XKR-S feels every bit capable of the 4.4sec to 62mph and 8.7sec to 100mph that Jag claims. Top speed? Limited to 186mph, but likely to hit 200mph shorn of the electronic shackles.
The XKR-S cabrio costs £103,000, or £6000 more than the coupe. It’s also significantly pricier than the already superb XKR, and that might be too much, particularly for those not convinced by the aggressive body kit, which gives the Jag the look of a jowly MX-5. The dated, plasticky dashboard too, sits uneasily with that price. But in terms of performance and dynamics, the XKR-S is worth every penny, and even appears great value compared to Aston’s DBS Volante.
Like Ferrari's new 458 Spider, the XKR-S cabrio is another rapid rag-top that gives almost nothing away to its coupe cousin, yet adds another dimension to the experience.
>> Click 'Add your comment' below and let us know what you think of the Jaguar XKR-S Convertible
Add your comment
Sign in You must be signed in to submit a comment.
Jaguar XKR-S Convertible (2012) CAR review
Subject
Your comment
By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions
Cancel
You must be logged in to subscribe to a topic
Login or register now
tuboludo says
RE: Jaguar XKR-S Convertible (2012) CAR review
DAMN ITS UGLY!
25 February 2012 13:22
Ray_A says
I get the horrible feeling that the new BMW M6 convertible will make this feel very old indeed. The interior is not up to the job, and the bodykit is horrible, the front being all bulldog jowly. I'll take a standard XK-R convertible in deep metallic red, thanks. Far more tasteful.
13 February 2012 16:13
V12 Migaloo says
Yes, I have to say that having seen a white one in the flesh its not cohesive. But having seen the Red and the Grey one these do look much better as it masks the body kit. The Grey looks particularly tough. Still looks 10 times better then a Six Series IMO. As for old tech, I suppose where you're coming from. All aluminium body shell OLD TECH? Nope. 5.0 Litre V8 OLD TECH?? Jaguar always preferred to constanty develop their engines as they where always spot on in the first place and just needed constant (XK, V12, AJ, V8, et al). With this model certainly the default choice of a 911 for an every day driver is no longer a given...?
Yes, I have to say that having seen a white one in the flesh its not cohesive. But having seen the Red and the Grey one these do look much better as it masks the body kit. The Grey looks particularly tough. Still looks 10 times better then a Six Series IMO. As for old tech, I suppose where you're coming from. All aluminium body shell OLD TECH? Nope. 5.0 Litre V8 OLD TECH?? Jaguar always preferred to constanty develop their engines as they where always spot on in the first place and just needed constant (XK, V12, AJ, V8, et al).
With this model certainly the default choice of a 911 for an every day driver is no longer a given...?
08 February 2012 16:18
Johann says
Well put Mercman. It might have Pace but it does not have Space (a given with the body type, so not an issue) but there certainly is no Grace. All that creaking old tech (and styling) with a totally tasteless body kit for a six figure sum of money?! What a laugh.
08 February 2012 12:55
Mercman says
Probably a fantastic drive but just as well you can't see the outside while you are driving! Very XK meets Evo/Scooby in my opinion - whatever happened to the brand strapline Grace, Space and Pace?
08 February 2012 12:34
Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.
Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)
Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.