Skip to content
Kia models, news & reviews
3
Handling
Performance
2
Usability
4
Feelgood factor
Readers' rating
By Ben Barry
First Drives
22 March 2011 15:32
This is the new Rio, Kia’s B-segment rival for the Ford Fiesta. It’s 20mm longer, 25mm wider and 15mm lower than its predecessor. More importantly, though, its wheelbase is also extended by 70mm to 2570mm – significantly more than the Fiesta’s 2489mm.
It’ll be on sale as a five-door hatch in the third quarter of this year, the three-door following in early 2012, and two petrols and diesels will be available: 1.4-litre 108bhp and 1.25-litre 84bhp petrols and 1.4-litre 89bhp and 1.1-litre 69bhp diesels.
We’re driving the 1.1-litre three-cylinder diesel, with 69bhp, 119lb ft and 94g/km in the manual trim we’re sampling, or just 84g/km with the four-speed auto.
Well, it’s a tricky one. Even though the Rio has already been unveiled in Geneva and we’re tucked away at Kia’s Namyang proving ground in Korea, our test car is still sporting full camouflage, while the interior panels are pre-production lash-ups.
Judging by the show car, though, it’s a sharp looking thing. And there’s certainly plenty of room in the back – six footers can sit behind six footers with room to spare – and there’s bags of headroom too, even though you’re perched too high on the front seats. There are also 288-litres of boot space – just 62 litres shy of a Golf, though we couldn’t actually access the boot due to that heavy camouflage. Nonetheless, the space is more comparable to cars in the class above.
There are also six airbags as standard – Kia is aiming for a five-star NCAP safety rating.
Another tricky one – our test drive amounted to two lengths of an empty Olympic swimming pool. But I can tell you this: the three-pot diesel does have that typical thrummy character exhibited by all threes, but it’s a little loud and coarse and not very quick at all – the Polo Bluemotion’s comparable powerplant is better, and we’d sooner have the petrol three-pot from the Kia’s Hyundai i10 sibling.
As far as we can tell, the Rio’s ride is pretty compliant, but the steering feels dead and heavy for a car so small, and, when we swerved in and out of the lane, the body didn’t feel particularly well controlled. There was also quite a high level of wind noise – presumably down to the camouflage – and the manual gearbox crunched into third.
Forward visibility is okay despite the swooping A-pillars, but the chunky C-pillars make seeing over your shoulder tough.
With such a short drive in a pre-production mule, it’s hard to draw any serious conclusions from this drive. There are many plus points to the Rio: the excellent interior and boot space for the class, the frugal running costs, good safety equipment and decent value for money.
We know the production car will be more cohesive, but judging from this early drive, we’d bank on the Hyundai i20 or, better still, the Ford Fiesta being superior.
Add your comment
Sign in You must be signed in to submit a comment.
Kia Rio (2011) pre-production prototype CAR review
Subject
Your comment
By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions
Cancel
You must be logged in to subscribe to a topic
Login or register now
bertandnairobi says
RE: Kia Rio (2011) pre-production prototype CAR review
Has nobody else seen fit to comment on this article?
23 March 2011 12:46
What´s interesting about this story is that Kia felt it worth the money to bung Mr Barry in a crate full of straw and water and the ship him to Namyang. Not to show him a polished class-busting design, but a prototype decked in PVC and bits of plastic debris. And well done to Kia for getting a story published about what may (I say "may" to be fair) be a car that turns out not to be very interesting in the cold light of day. Let me ask this: what if this kind of thing escalates so that journalists are invited earlier and earlier into the design process so they are shown half-finished CAD models of b-pillar trim, doodles of engine management programmes and some roughly-welded floor pans with bits of the previous car bolted on? This is what happens: "It´s a bit hard to tell quite what the next Isubarudai B6 is going to be like since, for the moment, it´s just some bits of suspension components and an engine block on a trailer. When I took the bits of metal out to the test track and dragged them about I got the impression that the gearchange is going to be a slightly slicker affair that at present. Almost certainly the rear suspension will be better able to absorb mid-frequency undulations. The final design isn´t certain since sign-off is still 40 months away. But for the moment, based on what I have seen of the CAD models of the door frames and the engineless mule I was allowed to look at, there are grounds to be optimistic..." Post-script: the new car is of course, longer and wider. The rest of the world is miniaturising while the car business is busy scaling up so that by 2040 a supermini will be longer than a 1967 Cadillac Eldorado.
What´s interesting about this story is that Kia felt it worth the money to bung Mr Barry in a crate full of straw and water and the ship him to Namyang. Not to show him a polished class-busting design, but a prototype decked in PVC and bits of plastic debris. And well done to Kia for getting a story published about what may (I say "may" to be fair) be a car that turns out not to be very interesting in the cold light of day. Let me ask this: what if this kind of thing escalates so that journalists are invited earlier and earlier into the design process so they are shown half-finished CAD models of b-pillar trim, doodles of engine management programmes and some roughly-welded floor pans with bits of the previous car bolted on?
This is what happens:
"It´s a bit hard to tell quite what the next Isubarudai B6 is going to be like since, for the moment, it´s just some bits of suspension components and an engine block on a trailer. When I took the bits of metal out to the test track and dragged them about I got the impression that the gearchange is going to be a slightly slicker affair that at present. Almost certainly the rear suspension will be better able to absorb mid-frequency undulations. The final design isn´t certain since sign-off is still 40 months away. But for the moment, based on what I have seen of the CAD models of the door frames and the engineless mule I was allowed to look at, there are grounds to be optimistic..."
Post-script: the new car is of course, longer and wider. The rest of the world is miniaturising while the car business is busy scaling up so that by 2040 a supermini will be longer than a 1967 Cadillac Eldorado.
23 March 2011 07:03
mini1 says
I don't know how you can make that judgement - "we'd bank on the i20 or Fiesta being superior" when you haven't had a "proper" test drive. Additionally, you can't tell how much it'll cost - could end up being in a totally different price bracket to the now-expensive Fiesta.
22 March 2011 18:40
Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.
Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)
Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.