Skip to content
Mercedes-Benz models, news & reviews
4
Handling
Performance
5
Usability
Feelgood factor
Readers' rating
2.5
By Ben Barry
First Drives
08 March 2011 08:00
At a casual glance the revised 2011 Mercedes C-class looks much the same, but this mid-life facelift actually consists of 2000 new parts that variously fettle the exterior, interior and powertrain – more than any other facelift in Merc’s history.
The exterior looks a little sharper thanks to new bumpers, headlights and an all-aluminium bonnet (unusually for a facelift the bonnet is a new tooling, because the headlights are a different shape and wouldn’t work with the old design), while the grille is more prominent too.
Mercedes was clearly cut by criticism of the 2007 car’s interior, which was well-built, but did its best to suggest otherwise with grainy plastics and a slabby architecture. That’s why the pop-out multi-media screen has been ditched in favour of a slickly integrated replacement, while the plastics look and feel better too. There’s also a classy metal finish on the climate control dials, plus centre console switches lifted from the SLS supercar. It’s a style much more in-keeping with the slick exterior. The Comand multi-media system also remains the easiest, most intuitive system of all rivals. Shame we couldn’t test the system’s new-fangled internet connectivity at the Tenerife launch location. Doh!
Meanwhile, the seven-speed auto transmission is improved, there’s a standard stop/start system and the 3.0-litre V6 TD is both more powerful and more frugal too – it still loses out to the BMW 335d for outright bhp, but it’s got more torque, plus the Merc’s C02 and mpg figures are both better.
We tried two specs: comfort-focussed Elegance trim and the sportier, well, Sport spec that most Brits opt for. The Elegance is every bit the mini-S-class limousine, with a very supple, waterbed-like ride and sterile, if precise enough, steering. On the plus side, it’s extremely comfortable and unlike anything else in its segment. The negative is that the Elegance’s impressive comfort naturally brings a trade-off in dynamism – it’s a difficult thing to drive quickly down the road and feel totally on top of. But if you like to waft about, there’s nothing better.
The Sport is a much more intuitive drive – body roll is controlled far more convincingly through transitions, while it bites into turns with greater conviction; it feels less sloppy, more immediate in every way. The trade off, of course, is a deterioration in ride quality, which is firm, if still tolerable.
Whatever the spec, the 350 CDI is thumpingly quick, and actually the pick of the range – the four-pot diesels are a little harsh, while the petrol six doesn’t sound anywhere near as good as it did in the SLK we drove the next day, topping out with a disappointingly diesely crescendo. Factor in those BMW-beating economy figures – quite a feat these days – and the 350 CDI makes a very convincing case for itself.
It looks very similar to the old car, but Mercedes has gone through the C-class with a fine toothcomb, buffing out the bad bits, enhancing the already great bits, to create a mid-size saloon that’s up there with the very best.
Impressive, too, that it bests the 335d on C02 and mpg. Yet we still prefer driving the BMW. For outright comfort, the C350 Elegance is unbeatable, but the BMW manages to strike that real-world middle ground with more conviction than either Elegance or Sport-spec Mercs quite pull off.
Add your comment
Sign in You must be signed in to submit a comment.
Mercedes C350 CDI facelift (2011) CAR review
Subject
Your comment
By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions
Cancel
You must be logged in to subscribe to a topic
Login or register now
timbo65 says
RE: Mercedes C350 CDI facelift (2011) CAR review
Heh heh, yeah it must be nice to cruise around in comfort with that 'comfy' looking grille, but have the ability to blast past some unsuspecting driver in a 318 M sport or C200 sport!! Is yours a manual box? The only real criticism I have of my 3 coupe is the bloody box. You dont need to do weight training if you own a manual boxed BMW I can tell you (well not on your left arm anyway!!)
11 March 2011 09:16
alfajock says
It's all subjective obviously, but I've got a 2008 C320CDI Elegance and it handles just fine; my other regular drive is my wife's 525d and i don't notice it being significantly worse handling, but it's ride comfort is in another league, which counts rather more over my 30k mpa. Elegance trim also has the charming benefit of looking like my Dad's car but going like stink, rather than the sadly more usual combination of (dare i say a tad vulgar) Sport trim and anemic C200 engine. Each to their own, but Elegance spec seems more like what I always thought a Merc would be like. And no, I'm not old or especially a Merc fan - first one after years of Alfas and Saab Aeros.
It's all subjective obviously, but I've got a 2008 C320CDI Elegance and it handles just fine; my other regular drive is my wife's 525d and i don't notice it being significantly worse handling, but it's ride comfort is in another league, which counts rather more over my 30k mpa. Elegance trim also has the charming benefit of looking like my Dad's car but going like stink, rather than the sadly more usual combination of (dare i say a tad vulgar) Sport trim and anemic C200 engine. Each to their own, but Elegance spec seems more like what I always thought a Merc would be like.
And no, I'm not old or especially a Merc fan - first one after years of Alfas and Saab Aeros.
10 March 2011 17:58
Sam you're right of course, but apparently the current C class in sport guise is a very tidy handling car. Throw in a (apparently) better gearbox than a 3 series, not to mention a lack of run flat tyres & it could actually be a nicer car to live with!!
09 March 2011 20:00
Sam the Eagle says
I thought Mercs 'in days of yore' didn't have a great reputation for handling anyway (but no one cared that much in those days).
09 March 2011 16:38
@robinstp: dont exagerate! The testers notes above say of the sport, "a deterioration in ride quality, which is firm, if still tolerable"..... No mention of (as you say) 'great discomfort'!! If you know anything about suspension set-up you will know that a car that handles best will always have a firmish ride, whereas a car that rides best will inevitably be worse to drive dynamically! Oh & Grunt, personally I think the sport nose looks great!! ps, I'm not especially a MB fan either!
@robinstp: dont exagerate! The testers notes above say of the sport, "a deterioration in ride quality, which is firm, if still tolerable"..... No mention of (as you say) 'great discomfort'!! If you know anything about suspension set-up you will know that a car that handles best will always have a firmish ride, whereas a car that rides best will inevitably be worse to drive dynamically!
Oh & Grunt, personally I think the sport nose looks great!!
ps, I'm not especially a MB fan either!
09 March 2011 16:09
Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.
Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)
Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.