Skip to content

 
 

CAR Reviews

Click Thumbnails to Enlarge

Statistics

How much? £10,950
On sale in the UK: Now
Engine: 1397cc 16v 4-cyl, 74bhp @ 4500rpm, 88lb ft @ 2500rpm
Transmission: Six-speed manual, front-wheel drive
Performance: 13.2sec 0-62mph, 109mph, 53.3mpg, 128g/km CO2
How heavy / made of? 1135kg/steel
How big (length/width/height in mm)? 3699/1683/1407
Need to know

CAR's rating

Rated 3 out of 53

Handling

Rated 4 out of 54

Performance

Rated 2 out of 52

Usability

Rated 3 out of 53

Feelgood factor

Rated 3 out of 53

Readers' rating

Rated 2.5 out of 52.5

Mini First (2009) hatchback CAR review

By Ben Barry

First Drives

10 August 2009 14:15

Hip, urban young things take the fun Fiat 500 very seriously, and now, it seems, so does Mini – with the launch of the new entry-level First, the company is targeting the slinky Italian directly.

Where does this new Mini One slot into the range?

The First usurps the Mini One’s entry-level slot, undercutting that car’s £12,345 price tag by almost £1500. At £10,950, it also undercuts Fiat’s range-topping 1.3-litre diesel 500 by £150. However, the more comparable 1.2- and 1.4-litre petrol 500s are still significantly cheaper, prices ranging from £8300 to £10,905.

Do the maths add up? Well, the Mini people say there’s a far larger pool of potential buyers at the First’s price point than the One’s.

What’s it like to drive?

It’s sloooooooow. The First shares its 1397cc four-pot with the One, but it’s down 20bhp to 74bhp, and torque takes a 15lb ft hit to 88lb ft. With 1135kg to lug around, that’s slow, slow, slow. Even if you couldn’t care less about speed, you will notice that this car is more gutless than a Billingsgate Haddock.

The rest, of course, is classic Mini – a sharp, grippy chassis; great steering; strong brakes; a smoother ride that the first-gen new Mini.

It’s much cleaner, right?

Nope. THe First still churns out a way-off-the-pace 128g/km, still returns 53.3mpg – a 318d does better, and certainly won’t take over 13 seconds to hit 62mph. To add insult to injury, the First is still in the same group five insurance bracket as the One too.

By the time you realise that the standard One’s air-con has been stripped (it’s £665 extra, please), and you’re actually not allowed to spec the One’s optional sat-nav, alloys or cruise control, then, well, you have to really not want a 500.

You could argue that there’s something quite nice about the simplicity of the proposition, but there’s no arguing about the lack of performance, which – if you do spec air-con – is saving you just £800 over the far fleeter, equally frugal, equally insurance-friendly One.

Verdict

Yes, the First makes Mini ownership more accessible, it still embodies most of what we love about the brand and it makes sense to Mini when seen from the vantage point of spreadsheets and tabulated car sales – yet it doesn’t quite add up as an ownership proposition.

If you can, stretch to a Mini One or go secondhand. If neither of those options work, take a look at a Fiat 500.

>> Click 'Add your comment' below and let us know what you think of the new Mini First

1

Rate this article...

Average rating: Rated 2.5 out of 52.5 (32 votes)

Discuss this

Add your comment

Mini First (2009) hatchback CAR review

Subject

Your comment

By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions

Cancel

 

AnthonySoprano

reward badge

AnthonySoprano says

RE: Mini First (2009) hatchback CAR review

Wittgenfrog. The clue is in the name. First. It's for da Yoof. It is their first car. What the Yoof really want is a Cooper but Yoof insurance is astronomical for a One, let alone a Cooper. But not with this model.

 

Anyway, you're the one who always posts that drivel about BMW's Mini being a marketing puffball, devoid of technical innovation. It's nice to see that you've shifted your well-honed arguments to denigrating "class": the last refuge of the small-minded snob.

14 August 2009 15:31

 

Batty

reward badgemoderatorstaff

Batty says

RE: Mini First (2009) hatchback CAR review

wittgenfrog and Brand0, you approach the car from alternate viewpoints. Brandy appears to like his car to accentuate his personality, whereas wittgenfrog appears to prefer his to be engineered to be pratical. I fall more into the thought pattern of wittyfrog, but I do appreciate the steadfast support that Brand0 gives to BMW. Nicely argued the pair of you chaps and what is an absolute pleasure for the rest of us to witness is that is done so without recourse to vulgairty nor personal insult.

 

If only other members could exercise such restraint.

13 August 2009 22:44

 

Batty

reward badgemoderatorstaff

Batty says

RE: Mini First (2009) hatchback CAR review

Brandy, are BMW one of your clients perchance?

13 August 2009 22:38

 

Brand0

reward badge

Brand0 says

RE: Mini First (2009) hatchback CAR review

WITTENFOG - that argument would work is that class was related to power.  Bug it's not.  Those considering a brittle, but pretty Fiat will be tempted by a car that isn't based on a cheaper model and priced upwards, especially if they don't care for speed.  As for the efficiency thing, the entire MINI range is celebrated for efficiency, so buyers STILL get an efficient MINI.

13 August 2009 22:28

 

wittgenfrog

reward badge

wittgenfrog says

RE: Mini First (2009) hatchback CAR review

I can't really accept this as some kind of "Mini for our times" effort: allowing the financially challenged to "enjoy" the "Mini experience" (&c...).  As has been pointed-out BMW have expended considerable effort making the bloody thing slower without improving economy, solely to acheive marketing differential.

A "Mini" will never be an austerity buy.   The whole point of the brand is that its a "cut above" those nasty common Toyotas, Renaults, Fords etc.   There is something indefinable about "class" in an automotive sense and by producing this unnecssarily neutered version of their cash-cow BMW have shown they don't have any.    Having said that, the various ludicrous SUV, "Traveller" and other spin-offs had already made that pretty clear!

12 August 2009 09:46

Become a CAR contributor

Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.

Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)

CAR magazine June issue 611
Untitled Document

Become a CAR contributor

Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.