Skip to content
Nissan models, news & reviews
4
Handling
3
Performance
Usability
Feelgood factor
Readers' rating
2.5
By Tim Pollard
First Drives
08 July 2010 00:54
Based on a Micra... How does the new Nissan Juke drive?This precise spec of car rapidly shows its true colours. The new 1.6 turbo is a strong performer, offering punchy acceleration at almost any engine speed (peak torque is generated from 2000-5200rpm) and it's quiet enough about its business, although lacking in character.What lets the side down is the CVT transmission. Nissan's pioneered this for years and I remember the hoopla over the stepped 'gears' offered on the late 90s Primera. Well the tech's still here and it's improved, yet it does this engine few favours, the car mooing and lurching somewhat as the gears expand and stretch while a computer works out what your right foot's signalling.Slip into manual mode and things improve, but then if you want to change gear yourself, surely you'd pick the front-drive manual turbo? There are no paddles, either, so you end up banging the large gearlever back and forth. We didn't drive the manual turbo, but the stick-shift diesel had a pleasingly precise and speedy action.Juke: ride and handlingThe new Nissan baby crossover rides very well. The 4x4 version tested here is the only model to get Qashqai-derived independent rear suspension and it smothers road scars better than the torsion beam of lesser models. What's most striking is the speediness of the steering. The Juke's rack is fast-geared and the car responds like a greyhound to changes of direction. This will appeal to Mini owners and lends the car a pointy, agile feel.However, the rest of the chassis lacks the polish of a Mini. While it rides well most of the time, the Juke doesn't feel as composed through corners as a Mini rival. In extremis, the Nissan can lurch a little – almost as if the nose is moving so quickly and the rest of the car can't catch up. The 4x4 comes with torque vectoring, and either rear wheel can do all the driving during hard cornering, feeling like a skier pirouetting on his edges during hard, low-speed corners.VerdictThis is not the best Juke, and we'll be running separate drives of the other versions we've driven. Yet on first acquaintance, Nissan has turned out a really interesting alternative to a Mini Countryman, Audi A1 or Alfa Mito. At least, those are the cars that it wants to compete with.The styling will make or break the Juke and there are bound to be people out there for whom a crazily styled, look-at-me wagon will be spot-on. This is a very expressive car and while many will be deterred, we can't help feel that a small slice of target customers will find a really interesting alternative here.Yet another quirky Nissan.
Add your comment
Sign in You must be signed in to submit a comment.
Nissan Juke 1.6 DiG-T (2010) CAR review
Subject
Your comment
By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions
Cancel
You must be logged in to subscribe to a topic
Login or register now
bertandnairobi says
RE: Nissan Juke 1.6 DiG-T (2010) CAR review
Whoops and sorry. As car4mh pointed out, the 1441 number can be found at Nissan´s website by reading the PDF more carefully than I did. I apologise for my oversight! The given figure is ("kerb weight min./max. 2") 425/1441 kg. It´s given at the top right of the PDF page 4.
Whoops and sorry. As car4mh pointed out, the 1441 number can be found at Nissan´s website by reading the PDF more carefully than I did.
I apologise for my oversight! The given figure is ("kerb weight min./max. 2") 425/1441 kg. It´s given at the top right of the PDF page 4.
24 November 2011 08:52
seant says
@car4mh. That's a bit better. That leaves the 4 average Germans free to pack in another 90kg, which is either a fifth German or, Wikipedia tells me, the brains of 10 sperm whales.
23 November 2011 20:03
car4mh says
@Bertandnairobi - I checked the Nissan Juke press kit from the time of this article, and Nissan UK's public website for the Juke. For the model of Juke tested, both sources list kerb weight as 1441kg, and gross vehicle weight as 1860kg. Your 1315kg kerb weight is the 1.6DiG-T with six-speed manual and front-wheel drive, not the CVT-M6 model with four-wheel drive tested in this review. You can download Nissan UK technical data for the Juke in PDF form from its website:(click on the PDF link under the picture of the Juke for the full price and specification list) www.nissan.co.uk/#vehicles/crossovers/juke/pricing-and-specifications/discover/features/summary
23 November 2011 19:43
"but I’d wager most of us car drivers haven’t a clue how much, or little, we can stuff in." Quite right. I have a feeling that four people and their luggage are manageable for my car but if I was to fill it with entirely with books or worse, magazines, I´d be risking a mishap.
23 November 2011 17:10
Here´s the difference between kerb weight and the other one, according to Jimmy Wales: "Curb weight (US English) or kerb weight (UK/Commonwealth English) is the total weight of a vehicle with standard equipment, all necessary operating consumables (e.g., motor oil and coolant), a full tank of fuel, while not loaded with either passengers or cargo.[1][2] This definition may differ from definitions used by governmental regulatory agencies or other organizations. For example, many European Union manufacturers include the weight of a 75 kilogram driver to follow European Directive 95/48/EC.[3] Additionally, organizations may define curb weight with fixed levels of fuel and other variables to equalize the value for the comparison of different vehicles." "A gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR)[1] is the maximum allowable total weight of a road vehicle or trailer when loaded - i.e., including the weight of the vehicle itself plus passengers, and cargo. The difference between gross weight and curb weight is the total passenger and cargo weight capacity of the vehicle. For example, a pickup truck with a curb weight of 4,500 pounds (2,041 kg) might have a cargo capacity of 2,000 pounds (907 kg), meaning it can have a gross weight of 6,500 pounds (2,948 kg) when fully loaded."
Here´s the difference between kerb weight and the other one, according to Jimmy Wales:
"Curb weight (US English) or kerb weight (UK/Commonwealth English) is the total weight of a vehicle with standard equipment, all necessary operating consumables (e.g., motor oil and coolant), a full tank of fuel, while not loaded with either passengers or cargo.[1][2]
This definition may differ from definitions used by governmental regulatory agencies or other organizations. For example, many European Union manufacturers include the weight of a 75 kilogram driver to follow European Directive 95/48/EC.[3] Additionally, organizations may define curb weight with fixed levels of fuel and other variables to equalize the value for the comparison of different vehicles."
"A gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR)[1] is the maximum allowable total weight of a road vehicle or trailer when loaded - i.e., including the weight of the vehicle itself plus passengers, and cargo.
The difference between gross weight and curb weight is the total passenger and cargo weight capacity of the vehicle. For example, a pickup truck with a curb weight of 4,500 pounds (2,041 kg) might have a cargo capacity of 2,000 pounds (907 kg), meaning it can have a gross weight of 6,500 pounds (2,948 kg) when fully loaded."
23 November 2011 15:24
Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.
Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)
Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.