Skip to content

 
 

CAR Reviews

Click Thumbnails to Enlarge

Statistics

How much? £18,495
On sale in the UK: Now
Engine: 1461cc 8v 4-cyl turbodiesel, 102bhp @ 4000rpm, 177lb ft @ 2000rpm
Transmission: Six-speed manual, front-wheel drive
Performance: 13.3sec 0-62mph, 106mph, 49.6mpg, 149g/km CO2
How heavy / made of? 1604kg/steel
How big (length/width/height in mm)? 4525/1780/1645
Need to know

CAR's rating

Rated 3 out of 53

Handling

Rated 3 out of 53

Performance

Rated 3 out of 53

Usability

Rated 3 out of 53

Feelgood factor

Rated 3 out of 53

Readers' rating

Rated 2 out of 52

Nissan Qashqai+2 1.5dCi (2009) CAR review

By Glen Waddington

First Drives

22 January 2009 10:00

Live for the unexpected. That’s Nissan’s slogan for the Qashqai. And what you might not expect is a 1.5-litre diesel engine where the 2.0-litre normally lives. This is a big car – the +2 is 211mm longer than the standard Qashqai and weighs 1604kg – so the newly introduced small engine might not be your first choice. Question is, should you choose it at all?

A tiny engine. Must make this a cheap car then?

You’ll save yourself £1230 by choosing this instead of the 2.0-litre but £18,495 isn’t exactly cheap. The performance figures are less impressive than the 148bhp 2.0-litre’s too but they feel a lot further apart even than a 12mph top speed and 2.4sec 0-62mph sprint time deficit suggest.

The 2.0-litre diesel feels revvy and responsive, with plenty of acceleration on tap. The 1.5 feels like you’d expect it to feel in such a big car: slothful. You can row it along on the modicum of torque but you’ll soon give up wringing its neck. From a performance point of view, this is not a diesel for enthusiastic drivers and it emits a tediously tinkly soundtrack too. Cruising is peaceful enough though, once you’ve got up to speed. Eventually.

Doesn’t bode well for a full load

Actually, the Qashqai feels equally slow no matter how many people you pack it with. So don’t worry about that. Worry instead about the quality of the accommodation for your rear-most passengers.

Actually, Nissan says the third row is intended only for those less than 1.6m tall. And they really are just occasional seats for kids. They’re nicely trimmed, have proper belts and head restraints plus some padded trim either side of them on the inner panelling, but don’t take them seriously. It’s a real effort to get back there – you basically fold the middle row and clamber over – and it leaves you with virtually no boot space. Once there, you find room only for headless bicrural amputees, so don’t bother. I did it for you.

With the third row folded away – a simple task, and just as easy to flip them back up – you get a long, if shallow, boot and you can vary the balance between that and second-row legroom by sliding those seats back and forth.

>> >> Click ‘Next’ to read the rest of CAR’s first drive review of the Nissan Qashqai+2

12Next>>

Rate this article...

Average rating: Rated 2 out of 52 (66 votes)

Discuss this

Add your comment

Nissan Qashqai+2 1.5dCi (2009) CAR review

Subject

Your comment

By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions

Cancel

 

AlisonSte

reward badge

AlisonSte says

RE: Nissan Qashqai+2 1.5dCi (2009) CAR review

A 1.5 litre diesel? well volvo have tried 1.6 diesels in the S80, so it seems the fashionable thing to do. Good to see that Nissan have managed to change the major styling issue on the new version - the oversized headlights have finally gone on the 2010 model Nissan Qashqai, looks much better now.

21 June 2010 17:32

 

a t o m i c

reward badge

a t o m i c says

RE: Nissan Qashqai+2 1.5dCi (2009) CAR review

JB, what do you think "droll" means?

29 January 2009 16:04

 

Robby1977

reward badge

Robby1977 says

RE: Nissan Qashqai+2 1.5dCi (2009) CAR review

There lies my point MPI. Last year a ran a Volvo V50 2.0d, turbo, 136bhp (I think!) always returned 45mpg driven swiftly. Was loaned an underpowered S40 1.6 petrol for a few nights whilst it had work undertaken. I had to push it that hard just to make decent progress & not hold every last car up, it struggled to therefore achieve 30mpg!

23 January 2009 09:17

 

morepowerigor

reward badge

morepowerigor says

RE: Nissan Qashqai+2 1.5dCi (2009) CAR review

I suspect the real world fuel economy will disappoint because it'll need rowing so hard in give and take motoring and around town. May not be much of a saving after all.

22 January 2009 23:33

 

Robby1977

reward badge

Robby1977 says

RE: Nissan Qashqai+2 1.5dCi (2009) CAR review

70 bhp per tonne is woefully inadequate. There is nothing clever about a car this underpowered, this will just be another model of car that will have a queue of 10 wound up drivers behind it as it trundles down the A road at 42mph.

22 January 2009 19:58

Become a CAR contributor

Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.

Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)

June 2012 issue of CAR magazine
download bmw app

Become a CAR contributor

Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.