Skip to content
Peugeot models, news & reviews
4
Handling
Performance
3
Usability
Feelgood factor
Readers' rating
2.5
By Chris Chilton
First Drives
18 March 2011 14:00
Peugeot’s brilliant RCZ coupe couldn’t quite topple the VW Scirocco and Audi TT when we tested the trio last year in diesel form. Now we’ve tried the 197bhp petrol RCZ 200 to see if it’s good enough to be the coupe of choice.
No. This is the 1.6-litre four-cylinder engine Peugeot shares with BMW’s fast Minis. There’s a milder 154bhp RCZ available too, but this range-topping blown 1.6-litre petrol is much better. As well as that 197bhp, there’s 188lb ft of torque available in normal conditions and up to 203lb ft with overboost. While not as fast as its rivals – 62mph takes 7.6sec, the RCZ still feels plenty quick and easily outpaces its petrol (154bhp; 8.3sec) and diesel (161bhp; 8.7sec) sisters. And unlike many blown cars, it pulls hard to the redline too. Even makes a stirring noise. Well actually it’s more of a whisking sound, and we like it. Economy’s not bad either: 40mpg according to the combined-pie-in-the-sky cycle.
The rest of the drive is just as good as the engine. Teamed up with stiffer springs and dampers, the RCZ 200 gets a different anti-roll bar to improve agility, and it definitely seems to work judsging by the way the Pug dives into corners. The steering feels a little sticky at low speeds but then loosens up nicely, something that front-end grip rarely does. This is a seriously grippy coupe. Stops well too, thanks to larger 340mm front brakes (up from 302mm).
On the downside the ride is more bobbly than your favourite jumper, while not delivering the same degree of handling finesse you get from the TT or Scirocco. Peugeot builds its own dampers, and used to be masters of combining a relaxed ride with razor-sharp responses – but good as the RCZ is, the German coupes on adaptive dampers offer a better balance of comfort and body control.
The cabin quality is good, with the £515 optional leather-trimmed dashboard bringing an extra sense of occasion to an interior that feels more durable than the frangible French stereotype. But once you get past the low-slung seating position and the drama of those arching side windows, you start to notice the flaws. Like the long arms-short legs driving position straight out of a '70s Alfa. The back seats are useless too, the price you pay for the RCZ’s swoopy roofline. But that same unusual styling has spectators’ heads turning like a windmill in a hurricane. And it’s good value: £23k buys the basic 200 Sport and £26k a top-trim GT.
The RCZ is at its best in 200 GT spec and a hugely desirable coupe, but that doesn't make it best in class. Our gut feeling is that the faster, roomier, more comfortable VW would still triumph in a rematch, but it certainly would be closer.
>> Click 'Add your comment' below and let us know what you think of Peugeot RCZ 200
Add your comment
Sign in You must be signed in to submit a comment.
Peugeot RCZ 200 (2011) CAR review
Subject
Your comment
By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions
Cancel
You must be logged in to subscribe to a topic
Login or register now
lokinen says
RE: Peugeot RCZ 200 (2011) CAR review
Completely agree that the new RCZ looks stunning. Even when you've seen that many in the motoring press that you think you are bored of it, you see one in the metal and you start all over again ! Yes, it looks far better than the current bloated anonymous latest TT, pulled up behind a drop top one once and couldn't tell immediately if it was actually an A4, so bulbous has it become. Not the same with the original TT though, silver, bigger multiple spoke wheels, red leather...iconic and without it the RCZ wouldn't exist because it's the original TT that the Peugeot is really trying to be.
25 April 2011 08:36
robmr9 says
Saw it. Drove it. Bought it. Love it. I have owned the 200GT for about a month now and it's fabulous. never mind all the comments about needing short legs and long arms to drive it, or the other nit-picking. The truth is that it looks sensational, drives great, costs thousands less than the nearest opposition and still returns over 40 to the gallon on average and around 30 when pushed hard. It turns heads and draws crowds. I have yet to hear a negative comment from anyone who sees it. I can't speak about the performance compared to the the Audi and to be truthful I'm not over interested, you can only do so much on English roads anyway. But I can say that when my car was parked at the side of a TT, both cars in white, the RCZ looked like a supercar and drew all the attention whilst making the TT look very ordinary (actually it looks very ordinary anyway) . I'm with Flappy on this one the German cars are too square and boring to look at.
Saw it. Drove it. Bought it. Love it.
I have owned the 200GT for about a month now and it's fabulous. never mind all the comments about needing short legs and long arms to drive it, or the other nit-picking. The truth is that it looks sensational, drives great, costs thousands less than the nearest opposition and still returns over 40 to the gallon on average and around 30 when pushed hard.
It turns heads and draws crowds. I have yet to hear a negative comment from anyone who sees it. I can't speak about the performance compared to the the Audi and to be truthful I'm not over interested, you can only do so much on English roads anyway. But I can say that when my car was parked at the side of a TT, both cars in white, the RCZ looked like a supercar and drew all the attention whilst making the TT look very ordinary (actually it looks very ordinary anyway) . I'm with Flappy on this one the German cars are too square and boring to look at.
25 April 2011 00:10
Flappycars says
The RCZ is a piece of automotive architecture. It is different, individual and uncommon. It is not for drivers of German cars. I loathe and detest the Audi TT. It is everything it stands for. A true badge lickers car. The Pug is for individuals who do not not give 2 hoots for badge licking but admire it for its beauty. Not only does it have supercar looks, but it also has the running costs of a Peugeot HDI (at least the diesel 1 I have just ordered does). So all you TT lovers, go back to your Germanic, square thinking boring cars and enjoy. I shall enjoy my individualist RCZ. Years ago, I would have been driving my Lancia when you were all driving your BMW 3 series. No doubt that comment will cause lots of controversy and the usual comments about rust etc. I can take the stick. I here you all say " why don't you just buy a proper TT?" Because I don't want one, thats why. And I for one would not be seen dead in a German car. Long live individual cars. Thank goodness (at last) a new car I actually desire.
03 April 2011 09:35
antonyr says
PS Just seen a 60 plate RCZ at traffic lights out side my buisness in white looked stunning,and looking at peoples faces or should I say looks of envy etched on their faces . Sun shining on its very agil and planted stance I have to say very nice
22 March 2011 10:03
Oh dear Soldi a bit harsh when most people think this isa good looking car have you got your glasses on back to front ?. I suppose you rate the TT as good looking to me its typical Audi boring and predictable still style is subjective, and after seeing quite a few Peugeot RCZ,s here in Nottingham i to me ts great looking and alternative shape to the default Germans. Oh well funny old world Style and design hey. I always like the old Fiat Multipla only joking
21 March 2011 08:59
Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.
Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)
Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.