Skip to content
Porsche models, news & reviews
5
Handling
Performance
Usability
2
Feelgood factor
Readers' rating
3.5
By Ben Pulman
First Drives
28 May 2010 11:45
This is Porsche's new 911 GT3 RS, a harder and faster version of the already hard and fast GT3. Traditionally it's the best Porsche 911 variant - the GT2 is often too extreme and the turbo'd engine lacks aural delight - so what's the new one like? Read on for CAR's first drive review.
Oh yes. The 3.8 flat-six – up from 3.6-litres in the previous 997 RS – produces 444bhp at 7900rpm, an increase of 15bhp (at 300rpm higher) over the GT3. That means 117bhp/litre, and while the torque output of 317lb ft is unchanged, it too is produced at higher revs.
And what an engine. It chunters at idle, like a mechanic has left a few bolts in each cylinder, but clears its throat as the revs rise. There’s a glorious resonance through the cabin between 4 and 5000rpm, and after that the note gets louder and harder, and an aggressive howl drives you to thrash it to 8000rpm over and over. It's a proper race-bred engine, and quite why the GT2 RS needs another 167bhp we can't imagine.
Of course – the GT3 RS is only available with a motorsport-derived six-speed manual, which means a heavy clutch and the need to be very deliberate with your shifts. However, while it can be a little awkward when you’re trundling around, it’s much better when you need to bash through the gears. And keep up with that incredible engine – there’s revised transmission ratios so although the top speed is 1mph down on the GT3 (does that matter?) the acceleration is even more ferocious.
Look closely and you’ll spot the flared front wheelarches, which hide a wider front track – the GT2 RS shares the same hardware. Plus there’s a massive carbonfibre rear wing, that fills your doors mirrors and blocks out your rear-view mirror – unless there’s a BMW behind, you won’t see who is following. There’s a titanium exhaust too, which saves weight from where it counts in a 911 – at the back.
We’d agree. The Mk1 997 GT3 RS looked brilliant in bright orange or a green Kermit would be proud, complete with retro RS stickers, but the new treatment is a bit OTT. A basic white paint is free, a rather nice blue is £730, and the grey/black of our test is £1768. The contrasting red (or white gold) is free – hurrah! (sarcasm) – though silver wheels are a no-cost option, and if you ask Porsche nicely they’ll delete the graphics. After all, your business is worth £100k-plus.
>> Click 'Next' below to read more of our Porsche 911 GT3 RS first drive
Add your comment
Sign in You must be signed in to submit a comment.
Porsche 911 GT3 RS (2010) CAR review
Subject
Your comment
By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions
Cancel
You must be logged in to subscribe to a topic
Login or register now
motormojo says
RE: Porsche 911 GT3 RS (2010) CAR review
Kubrick, I take your point about this not being a car for the masses (not at £100K anyway). But I still struggle to see this car as the pinnacle of the sports car. I agree that it might represent the 911 in its purest form (and thats a good thing), but its just not that clever - at least from an engineering perspective. For that sort of money I'd expect to see something better than a titanium exhaust. I do agree about the 600 BHP behemoths - saw a couple of Bugatti Veron thingy's have a go at Prescott hillclimb at the weekend - they looked terrible - over weight and trounched (timewise) by cars costing about 100th their million pound price tag.
Kubrick,
I take your point about this not being a car for the masses (not at £100K anyway). But I still struggle to see this car as the pinnacle of the sports car. I agree that it might represent the 911 in its purest form (and thats a good thing), but its just not that clever - at least from an engineering perspective. For that sort of money I'd expect to see something better than a titanium exhaust.
I do agree about the 600 BHP behemoths - saw a couple of Bugatti Veron thingy's have a go at Prescott hillclimb at the weekend - they looked terrible - over weight and trounched (timewise) by cars costing about 100th their million pound price tag.
01 June 2010 16:42
kubrick says
Motormojo, I think you misunderstood me there, so allow me to clarify: I'm not saying everybody should or will be driving in 911 GT3s in ten years' time. What I tried to say is that as far as performance cars go, this is the concept most in keeping with the times; like a Lotus Elise for the very well off. Not a car for the masses by any means, but the pinnacle of the sports car - much more so than those multi-turbo, four wheel drive behemoths which need 600BHP+ in order to reach similar levels of performance, but without delivering an even remotely similar level of driver enjoyment.
Motormojo,
I think you misunderstood me there, so allow me to clarify: I'm not saying everybody should or will be driving in 911 GT3s in ten years' time. What I tried to say is that as far as performance cars go, this is the concept most in keeping with the times; like a Lotus Elise for the very well off. Not a car for the masses by any means, but the pinnacle of the sports car - much more so than those multi-turbo, four wheel drive behemoths which need 600BHP+ in order to reach similar levels of performance, but without delivering an even remotely similar level of driver enjoyment.
01 June 2010 16:22
"The future of motoring" Um - don't think so really. I like most people have a £100k burning a great big hole in my pocket right now but have other things more pressing to spend it on. Look don't get me wrong - I like the 911(I've driven - but never owned, a few) and they are quite lovely things. But the future of motoring is going to be rather more prosaic than a 440 bhp sports car. When people like Gordon Murray start turning their attention to city cars, when we start to see some clever engineering making cars capable of upwards of 60 mpg that are fun to own and drive - then you have quite an exciting and interesting future - and the 911 and its like will look hideously old fashioned and out of date.
"The future of motoring" Um - don't think so really. I like most people have a £100k burning a great big hole in my pocket right now but have other things more pressing to spend it on.
Look don't get me wrong - I like the 911(I've driven - but never owned, a few) and they are quite lovely things. But the future of motoring is going to be rather more prosaic than a 440 bhp sports car. When people like Gordon Murray start turning their attention to city cars, when we start to see some clever engineering making cars capable of upwards of 60 mpg that are fun to own and drive - then you have quite an exciting and interesting future - and the 911 and its like will look hideously old fashioned and out of date.
01 June 2010 15:14
jacomoseven says
This car has gone straight to the top of my dream car wish list. Of course, a McLaren F1 is more covetable, but as with all hypercars, how much would you or could actually drive it? You could go away in this for the weekend, without fretting about finding a secure garage everytime you stopped. The decals are like the deliberate missed stitch in an otherwise flawless Persian rug - as the 911 approaches perfection, they have to design in a mistake somewhere.
This car has gone straight to the top of my dream car wish list. Of course, a McLaren F1 is more covetable, but as with all hypercars, how much would you or could actually drive it? You could go away in this for the weekend, without fretting about finding a secure garage everytime you stopped.
The decals are like the deliberate missed stitch in an otherwise flawless Persian rug - as the 911 approaches perfection, they have to design in a mistake somewhere.
01 June 2010 14:29
Talking to a Porsche marketing chap I told him I believe that this is what makes Porsche - he couldn't disagree. I can forgive those capable-but-boring 911 Turbos, Cayennes and even the Panamera's bottom as long as they don't forget how to build these. And yes, DrPep, this is what the future of the sports car looks like. No triple turbos, no folding steel roof, but solid engineering with uncompromising attention to detail. It's as simple as that.
Talking to a Porsche marketing chap I told him I believe that this is what makes Porsche - he couldn't disagree. I can forgive those capable-but-boring 911 Turbos, Cayennes and even the Panamera's bottom as long as they don't forget how to build these.
And yes, DrPep, this is what the future of the sports car looks like. No triple turbos, no folding steel roof, but solid engineering with uncompromising attention to detail. It's as simple as that.
31 May 2010 15:40
Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.
Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)
Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.