Skip to content
Land Rover models, news & reviews
4
Handling
Performance
3
Usability
Feelgood factor
5
Readers' rating
By Chris Chilton
First Drives
14 July 2011 09:37
Before we get started, can we just clear one thing up: what sort of car is the Evoque meant to be? Hot hatch, coupe, SUV? Well, it’s a bit of all three really. The five-door model will tend to appeal to buyers looking at other small SUVs, like the BMW X1 and Audi Q3. But Land Rover sees the three-door, or Coupe, in JLR parlance, as a rival for cars like the Audi TT.
Not quite but it’s still a great place to be. The Coupe has a lower roofline than the five-door, but there’s not a huge difference in rear room – although getting in the back isn’t the work of a moment. Both have genuine space for four, unlike the TT and Peugeot’s RCZ. The driving position should suit all shapes, and despite the pillar-box rear window, visibility is actually good. Except for the huge blind spot created by the elephant’s ear wing mirror and chunky door pillar - blame EU legislation for the mirror mess.
Autos get the Jaguar rotary gear selector that rises from the centre console, behind which are a couple of buttons allowing you to tweak the terrain response off-road system, switching between, tarmac, sand and mud settings to suit the surface. And cars with the optional dynamics pack get another symbol, a twisty road graphic. Select this and the dials turn from glowing white to red.
Our top of the range Dynamic certainly felt luxurious and well screwed together, but as with cars like the Jaguar XF, there are a couple of areas that spoil the illusion – the lightweight action of the glovebox lid and centre console cubby, for instance.
Nothing revolutionary. No hybrids, no electric motors and, sorry US readers, no V6s either. There are a couple of four-cylinder turbodiesel engines, one developing 150bhp and the other 190bhp, plus a 240bhp turbocharged petrol four that’s essentially the next Focus ST motor. The 150 gets a six-speed manual ’box, the 190 a choice of six-speed manual or auto, and the 240 is auto only. They’re all four-wheel drive, bar the 150, which you can specify without the rear driveshafts for a £750 saving. Unconfirmed but almost certain to appear next year is a 300bhp hot hatch version of the 240 petrol.
Nothing like the Freelander it’s very loosely based on. It feels taut, secure and sporty, with vastly better body control than the Freelander, and quick witted steering. Imagine a car with the dynamic polish and poise of a small Ford combined with the vitality of a Mini Cooper. Land Rover’s engineers talked of wanting hot hatch and coupe drivers to be able to jump into the Evoque and still feel like they were in a similar machine, and that’s exactly how it feels. Magnetorheological adaptive dampers are optional and were fitted to the car we drove. For the most part the ride is excellent, but very occasionally the whole car will start pogoing, and that’s a trait that’s much more evident in Sport mode. The body control is good in Normal mode, but the car stays noticeably flatter in Sport, and the steering firms up too. It doesn’t improve true feel – but the weighting increase makes cornering at medium speeds smoother.
So far we’ve only driven the 190bhp 2.2 diesel. It’s best described as nippy, rather than quick – 62mph takes 8.5sec – but it’s fast enough to make use of the chassis, and returns 44mpg. It’s impressively refined unless wound out pointlessly to the limiter, but there is some turbo lag to deal with.
Off road? Few buyers are likely to find out and we haven’t tried it ourselves, but we have ridden shotgun alongside Land Rover engineers at their test track crawling up huge hills and can confirm it does everything you expect a car with a Range Rover badge to do. And if you do spend a lot of time on rutted tracks, the adaptive dampers are worth shelling out for. They don’t just improve handling on-road, but smooth out the worst of really bad unsealed tracks too.
And that’s where it comes a little unstuck. A bottom-rung front-wheel drive Evoque Pure will set you back £27,955 and comes with leather, but takes a slothful 11.2sec to reach 62mph. A more powerful four-wheel drive Dynamic or Prestige on the other hand, costs £40k. Add parking sensors, a decent hi-fi, the clever dampers and glass sunroof and you’re edging towards £45k – silly money for what is essentially a small diesel hatchback. Okay, so it doesn’t have the badge, but is a Scirocco R really worth £10k less?
The Evoque looks sensational and is genuinely good fun to drive. It’s too expensive, but we can’t imagine that getting in the way of sales success.
Add your comment
Sign in You must be signed in to submit a comment.
Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2D (2011) CAR review
Subject
Your comment
By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions
Cancel
You must be logged in to subscribe to a topic
Login or register now
oopnorth says
RE: Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2D (2011) CAR review
I am coming late to the discussion here (only just signed up). I think at least some of the price whinges are misplaced - there is so much attention on the £45k price that you can get to, that the lower reaches of the range are being ignored. Starting with the £28k front driver Pure, you get leather, what should be a decent stereo (not heard it myself), and a generally very nice cabin (sat in ohe last week for the first time - liked it more than I did from pictures). Adding 4wd costs about £750 with a move to 190bhp a further £1k. Automatic adds £1,610 to that, arriving at £31k. Speccing the tech pach (satnav & a few other bits & pieces) & metallic paint gets you to about £33.5k, well short of the dynamic/prestige prices. Trying to match the spec on a Freelander XS gets you to the same price with inferior stereo or £1k more for Alpine upgrade. A Q3 with similar engine/spec gets to about £33k, too. So price isn't as big an issue as everyone makes out - unless you are happy with something more utilitarian. The space inside is similar to my 2008 Subaru Outback - after setting the front seat for me (5ft10.5inches) I had enough space for me in the back to be comfortable. I am very hopeful it should be reliable, being made in the same place as the Freelander 2, which recently hit a similar place in reliability in one of those warranty company surveys (see What Car website) to Subaru Forester. Next time round I will get one, subject to test drive
I am coming late to the discussion here (only just signed up). I think at least some of the price whinges are misplaced - there is so much attention on the £45k price that you can get to, that the lower reaches of the range are being ignored.
Starting with the £28k front driver Pure, you get leather, what should be a decent stereo (not heard it myself), and a generally very nice cabin (sat in ohe last week for the first time - liked it more than I did from pictures). Adding 4wd costs about £750 with a move to 190bhp a further £1k. Automatic adds £1,610 to that, arriving at £31k. Speccing the tech pach (satnav & a few other bits & pieces) & metallic paint gets you to about £33.5k, well short of the dynamic/prestige prices.
Trying to match the spec on a Freelander XS gets you to the same price with inferior stereo or £1k more for Alpine upgrade. A Q3 with similar engine/spec gets to about £33k, too. So price isn't as big an issue as everyone makes out - unless you are happy with something more utilitarian.
The space inside is similar to my 2008 Subaru Outback - after setting the front seat for me (5ft10.5inches) I had enough space for me in the back to be comfortable. I am very hopeful it should be reliable, being made in the same place as the Freelander 2, which recently hit a similar place in reliability in one of those warranty company surveys (see What Car website) to Subaru Forester.
Next time round I will get one, subject to test drive
29 November 2011 10:53
enda1 says
@ carmobster Saw one of these nissan murano softtops in Boston last week. Quite hideous http://www.onlyconvertiblecars.com/convertiblecar.cfm?Car=258&Year=2011&Make=Nissan&Model=Murano CrossCabriolet
@ carmobster
Saw one of these nissan murano softtops in Boston last week. Quite hideous
http://www.onlyconvertiblecars.com/convertiblecar.cfm?Car=258&Year=2011&Make=Nissan&Model=Murano CrossCabriolet
27 July 2011 16:12
suvblogger says
Re: Range Rover Evoque Coupe 2.2D (2011) CAR review
The Evoque is the smallest, lightest and most efficient vehicle. Pure models feature brushed aluminum trim and neutral colors, while the Prestige badge brings with it two-tone leather wrapping nearly every surface and mixed wood and aluminum trim. Best Regards Shreya Mehta Check our interesting toyota suv reviews on suvblogger.com
The Evoque is the smallest, lightest and most efficient vehicle. Pure models feature brushed aluminum trim and neutral colors, while the Prestige badge brings with it two-tone leather wrapping nearly every surface and mixed wood and aluminum trim.
Best Regards
Shreya Mehta
Check our interesting toyota suv reviews on suvblogger.com
26 July 2011 07:06
V12 Migaloo says
I was lucky enough to be at one of the customer clinics about 4 years ago in Shepperton studios where both the 3 door and 5 door where on show against all the small and medium SUV's of the time. Back then it was being touted at around £25 - £30k, but I am shocked at the price of it now, just a few quid less then a Disco, but then I must be in the minority as they have already received over 18'000 orders with most dealers holding deposits for around 50 - 70 cars! And this is even without any of those clients driving it. Amazing. Reminds me of the effect that the Mustang and E-type had when they were unveiled to the market. Surely this must be one of the most succesful product launches in recent memory ??? Is this JLR's cash cow, eerr sorry Qashqai. One can fully understand why so many have been ordered and considering the markets movement towards tall cars with all weather grip this car will no doubt secure Land Rover and JLR's future for a long time to come. And Yes I agree with the other comments about the biased toward ze German brands, how can a X3 with a 2.0D be acceptable at £38k whilst a Land Rover with proper 4WD at £40k not be?
I was lucky enough to be at one of the customer clinics about 4 years ago in Shepperton studios where both the 3 door and 5 door where on show against all the small and medium SUV's of the time. Back then it was being touted at around £25 - £30k, but I am shocked at the price of it now, just a few quid less then a Disco, but then I must be in the minority as they have already received over 18'000 orders with most dealers holding deposits for around 50 - 70 cars! And this is even without any of those clients driving it. Amazing. Reminds me of the effect that the Mustang and E-type had when they were unveiled to the market. Surely this must be one of the most succesful product launches in recent memory ??? Is this JLR's cash cow, eerr sorry Qashqai. One can fully understand why so many have been ordered and considering the markets movement towards tall cars with all weather grip this car will no doubt secure Land Rover and JLR's future for a long time to come.
And Yes I agree with the other comments about the biased toward ze German brands, how can a X3 with a 2.0D be acceptable at £38k whilst a Land Rover with proper 4WD at £40k not be?
25 July 2011 10:50
hispano8 says
A mixed message here. On the one hand commparing it to an Audi Q3, on reliability terms (where did Audi sit on the JD Power table, and is this comparison justified when there is no track history for the Evoque?); and on the other, complaining about the pricing, when all that LR have done, is follow the German premium brand pricing model - make it espensive enough to show that you can afford it. I think it's an attractive, well priced automotive proposition, and look forward to driving one in September, when the dealer launch takes place.
23 July 2011 23:11
Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.
Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)
Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.