Skip to content

 
 

CAR Reviews

Click Thumbnails to Enlarge

Statistics

How much? £27,500
On sale in the UK: September 2011
Engine: 2179cc 16v 4-cyl turbodiesel, 187bhp, 310lb ft
Transmission: Six-speed manual, four-wheel drive
Performance: 9.5sec 0-60mph, 124mph, 49.6mpg, 149g/km CO2
How heavy / made of? 1700kg/steel
How big (length/width/height in mm)? 4365/1965/1635
Need to know

CAR's rating

Rated 4 out of 54

Handling

Rated 4 out of 54

Performance

Rated 3 out of 53

Usability

Rated 3 out of 53

Feelgood factor

Rated 4 out of 54

Readers' rating

Rated 3 out of 53

Range Rover Evoque prototype (2011) CAR review

By Phil McNamara

First Drives

31 March 2011 14:00

Agile, composed, punchy: that’s the verdict after CAR’s first drive of the forthcoming baby Range Rover, the Evoque. Land Rover has finally allowed a handful of journalists into the driving seat, for a couple of laps of the company’s Oxfordshire test course, as the countdown to the Evoque’s September 2011 on-sale date intensifies.

What exactly is this new Range Rover Evoque?

The Evoque takes the Range Rover blueprint of a luxurious, capable 4x4, and shrinks it to a footprint fractionally smaller than the new Ford Focus’s. Whereas the heavy Range Rover and Range Rover Sport models necessitate V6 and V8 power, the Evoque’s compact size and a stringent weight optimisation programme deliver a weight range from 1595 to 1700kg. That means all Evoques can run four-cylinder engines, either a 237bhp 2.0-litre turbocharged petrol or a 2.2-litre common-rail diesel, with 148 or 187bhp peak outputs. Add it all up and you have the most frugal, lowest emission Range Rover in the brand’s 41-year history.
 
Two hatchback bodystyles are available: a five door and a three-door, the latter of which Land Rover is marketing as a coupe. It has a slightly lower roofline and a slightly higher cost, around £1500 more than the five-door’s. Expect prices to kick off around £28,500 for a 148bhp diesel five-door; a two-wheel drive eD4 version, reducing CO2 emissions to beneath 130g/km, will cost around £27,500.

Enough preamble: let’s drive!

CAR tested a four-wheel drive Evoque prototype running the high-output diesel, which produces 187bhp and 310lb ft of torque, and returns 50mpg and emits 149g/km of CO2. The six-speed manual’s gearlever is close at hand, perched on the high centre console: Land Rover’s aim was to blend its trademark command driving position with the cockpit feel of a sports car. Imagine sitting in a broken-down TT on the back of a low-loader to get the picture. The gears are closely spaced, and shift with satisfying precision along each channel. Not that we got past fourth on the tight ribbon of tarmac, whose surface quality resembles the moon’s, with an endless supply of craters and bumps which provide the perfect playground for Land Rover’s chassis tuners.
 
The demonstration drive showcased the Evoque’s Magneride adaptive damping system. Metallic particles in the damper fluid react when a magnetic field is applied, stiffening the damper to tie down body pitch and roll. The computer-controlled system can change the damping force up to 50 times a second; Land Rover claims third-generation Magneride outperforms the standard damping system at both extremes of the dynamic and comfort spectrums. The system is only available with 19- and 20-inch wheels (standard diameter is 17 inches); it’ll be standard on the ‘Dynamic’ trim in the UK, and an £1150 option on ‘Prestige’ models.

What else can you tell me about the new baby Range Rover?

The Evoque’s steering is nicely judged, light and effortless and reminiscent of a Jaguar’s. It doesn’t feel as darty as a Range Rover Sport’s: more measured as you turn off the dead-ahead, then quickening noticeably as you apply increased lock. Variable assistance is from an electric motor, delivering a 2% saving in fuel consumption over a hydraulic system which can’t be disengaged when a helping hand isn’t required.
 
The common-rail turbodiesel sounds a bit gruff under full throttle, but with a torque curve the shape of Uluru, it hustles the Evoque along eagerly. Land Rover says 0-60mph takes 9.5secs, but it feels a little quicker. Powering up past 40, 50, 60mph along the tight, twisty sections, and the Evoque is kicked in multiple directions by the potholes, but the body’s reaction is crisp and unruffled. And the Evoque is impressively agile, turning sweetly into corners, and hanging on over crests under heavy load, despite the deflections of the rutted tarmac. In terms of its responses, the Evoque feels more like a sorted hatch than a wobbly SUV.
 
Engage Dynamic mode using the Terrain Response buttons and the dials turn red, and the Evoque feels more tightly lashed down – especially in the back. This is bad news for kids if their dad’s an enthusiastic driver. The steering also feels meatier. 

Verdict

All told, it’s a big tick for body control at pace: drive a little less ballistically and the Evoque negotiates ruts smoothly and quietly, though the ride remains on the firm rather than floaty side.
 
First, brief impressions of the Evoque reveal a composed and nimble 4x4, with real engineering substance beneath that sensationally alluring sheet metal. It’s still on track to be a smash hit.

>> Click 'Add your comment' below and let us know what you think of the new Range Rover Evoque

1

Rate this article...

Average rating: Rated 3 out of 53 (59 votes)

Discuss this

Add your comment

Range Rover Evoque prototype (2011) CAR review

Subject

Your comment

By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions

Cancel

 

rickerby

reward badge

rickerby says

RE: Range Rover Evoque prototype (2011) CAR review

AnthonySoprano of you would stop ranting for 5 seconds and listen to what your saying you would realise what utter drivel it is. Your analysis of the British Motor industry is based on a stereotype that is at least 20 years out of date. You even make reference to Donald Stokes still! This car demonstrates how the industry is now responding. It might not be aimed at people like you (what is?), but there is a massive target audience that will see that this car will sell like hot cakes, generate profits for UK PLC and secure thousands of decent jobs. By the way it is based on a Focus, not a Mondeo and it uses a Ford/PSA Anglo/French designed diesel Engine not a German one. Also most of Ford of Europe Chassis development is done at Warley in Essex and the companies centre of Excellence for Diesel Engine design and development as well as manufacturing is at Dagenham.

04 April 2011 09:11

 

AnthonySoprano

reward badge

AnthonySoprano says

RE: Range Rover Evoque prototype (2011) CAR review

@jacomoseven

 

Although I mentioned that uber-scum were responsible for the decline of the British car industry, I only named but two of their number. So the inferences you have drawn are entirely your own; I made no assertion that management were ex culpa. As, with few exceptions, they were toff cretins, of which Donald Stokes was the exemplar. Arguably the best thing Tata have done was getting in some Germans to run the show. However, I dearly wish they weren't involving a WAG in the design process too.

 

You appear to have a rather myopic view of industrial relations in Britain. Up to about 1984 (i.e. following Thatcher's series of Employment Acts) the UK lost a shocking number of days, by any standards, to industrial action. It is arguable that management, for all their flaws, spent more time fending off the unions than running the business. To cite examples after that point is absurd, for the unions were mostly neutered by then. But to deny this was a problem in the last 30 years simply beggars belief - the country took at least a decade after 1984 to escape the clutches of the unions and recover.

04 April 2011 01:09

 

paddyb

paddyb says

RE: Range Rover Evoque prototype (2011) CAR review

I'm all for this car and look forward to seeing it on the roads.  If half the existing Range Rover / Discovery owners who don't need their capablities down-size to this car, it can only be a good thing.

It's easy to be all puritanical about it not being a 'proper' 4x4, or not having 4WD, but has it damaged BMW having cheaper, non-performance models, or 4x4's?  You could argue that a large (or small) off-roader could never be considered the 'Ultimate Driving Machine' - but BMW has pulled off the marketing trick, and is a successful car maker.  The existence of this model doesn't mean you can't have a full sized, fully off-roadable RR / Discovery.  It simply offers more choice, at a different position on the on-road/off-road spectrum.  And if it enables JLR to be / remain solvent, then it is in everybody's interests.

Anyway, let's give it a chance, and not pre-judge it.

03 April 2011 15:53

 

chickenfeed

reward badge

chickenfeed says

RE: Range Rover Evoque prototype (2011) CAR review

@seant. - Well said. Nothing wrong with an Ewok. :)

03 April 2011 09:32

 

seant

reward badge

seant says

RE: Range Rover Evoque prototype (2011) CAR review

Dolourmight. Evoque. Wot iz rong wiv dat? Grate name. Y U poque funn wiv lode ov stoopid joques?

03 April 2011 07:55

Become a CAR contributor

Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.

Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)

CAR magazine June issue 611
Untitled Document

Become a CAR contributor

Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.