Skip to content
Renault models, news & reviews
4
Handling
3
Performance
Usability
Feelgood factor
Readers' rating
2.5
By Stephen Worthy
First Drives
02 July 2009 10:58
Think ‘Renault Scenic’ today and what does it conjure up? Mum stuck in traffic on the school run. Jammy-fingered kids staring wistfully out of the window. Dad pootling down to the seaside with the whole clan seething inside it. There are so many cars like the Scenic on the road today, it’s easy to forget how radical it was when it was the first of the compact, family MPVs to appear in 1996.
While the Scenic is an unlikely pioneer, its success means it’s a car that means a lot to Renault. But is its third incarnation worthy of its place in the Scenic story? Time to find out.
First off, a caveat. Renault’s 1.5-litre common rail diesel lump is a solid, competent engine which appears in a number of power options across its model range. Unfortunately, the version we drove on test – a manual version that has been tweaked to produce 110bhp – won’t be available in the UK until 2010, when it will appear alongside a dual-clutch model. It’s because the new Euro 5 emission regulations don’t come in until the tail end of this year.
For now, the nearest alternative to it when the Scenic arrives in showrooms in mid-July is the 106bhp model. There are some eight different engines – split equally between diesel and petrol – available at launch. There’s enough evidence from other Renault models to suggest the 1.5 dCi diesel in 106bhp form will be the plum choice for now. The 110 version performed well on our brief B-road/motorway test route. Punchy even at low revs (max torque of 177lb ft is delivered at 1750rpm), it's quiet and willing and unlikely to be shamed by its bigger diesel brothers, like the 2.0-litre dCi 160 further up the range. As it produces 130 g/km of CO2, it comes under Renault’s Eco 2 banner too.
Time will tell, but the 16v 1.6 petrol engine may prove to be the best option for those who eschew oil-burners. Indeed, if you are only going to use the Scenic for school runs and the occasional longer trip, it may be the better option. In Dynamique trim, at £16,195 it’s some £1500 cheaper than the 1.5 dCi 106. That’s a more than tidy differential when it’ll be around £60 to tank it.
Add your comment
Sign in You must be signed in to submit a comment.
Renault Scenic 1.5 dCi (2009) CAR review
Subject
Your comment
By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions
Cancel
You must be logged in to subscribe to a topic
Login or register now
Batty says
RE: Renault Scenic 1.5 dCi (2009) CAR review
Oops, it has happened again. For the desperate please find it under "Ask Batty" in the forums. Good day
Oops, it has happened again.
For the desperate please find it under "Ask Batty" in the forums.
Good day
03 July 2009 02:14
Captain Birdseye, the editor, (so named for his production line mentality and ability to produce a selection of bland, easily digested pieces for mass, unthinking consumption) decreed that I should test the new Scenic. Despite my earnest pleas for leniency he was resolute, I think he may envy my loins; for while I have a wife, two progeny, notoriety and three cars- he has a mountain bike, haemorrhoids and low sperm count. My offers of unselfish insemination of his partner Marie at last year’s Christmas party, weren’t taken in the spirit intended and there and I am beginning to consider that my enmity is requited. So off to the launch and there are various photos of happy families playing happy games and having happy times. Why even grand-mamma looks gleeful and gay; showing none of the resentment and rancour that usually accompanies even the shortest journey squeezed into the malodorous confines of a small people mover with both aging and not yet fully formed intestinal tracts. As a father myself I notice that there is no possible way that all the equipment could have been transported from home to happy place within the car itself, without resort to a step ladder and roof box (not shown). Much was made of the investigation and research done on how Renaults “friends” (nothing as base as a “customer” or “client” when using a Scenic obviously) use their current cars and how things could be improved. Many slides were produced (as was some truly awful cheese), but alas there was no replication of the wine crate loading so beloved by Mr Vicar in the Renault 16 launch of yore. To entertain myself I imaged Mr Bonomi and his boss Claire performing the can-can as the spoke, replete with musical accompaniment in my head. Ra-da, radada dad a, this now has a second hinge ra da, dadada hey, seven air bags, ra da da crappy plastics (oops sorry got a little carried away). The ordeal was a full hour long, with questions on top and as ever there was a junior reporter who ignored the dagger laden glares of her more elderly peers and asked a very hirsute chappy called Sebastian the safety expert, how they planned to maintain Renaults lead in the safety stakes. I could have clubbed her to submission with her recorder. The old gent from Autocar actually snorted in derision, but she continued. Waffle, upon piffle upon an empty stomach, never good before a drive. And so to the drive (sadly once again pas de jaune), I can pleasantly report that it is as slow and as ponderous as you undoubtedly expect. There is a lolling and a rolling but easily cleaned fabrics and slippery seats so I can at least alarm the children adequately with a convincing sense of insanity when they misbehave. Nothing quietens the car more effectively than a rampant father yelling with ferocity, threatening all manner of punishment at trip’s end and a commitment to corners that would shame Alonso in a quest to arrive expediently to administer it. The steering is woolly and disconnected, the seats are fabulously comfortable and easily rearranged and there are all manner of small crevices for things to get lost in. Sensibly, Renault understand that mud will travel with no respect for gravity and also understand that it will only be cleaned by people who wouldn’t allow it to get dirty in the first place, so everything is as robust and as chamfered as any parent may hope. The centre stack resembles some sort baboon’s face with the hooded brow over the instruments and air vents for the nose. But a small thing, why can’t the instruments be in front of the driver? Is it so hard for them to assume the sight lines that ergonomic evolution has dictated? Flourish is fine, but would it not be better to have fewer airbags and better instrumentation? The external shape and form is very plain, it puts the secret reviewer rather in mind of a tea pot. Functionally rotund is perhaps the best descr
Captain Birdseye, the editor, (so named for his production line mentality and ability to produce a selection of bland, easily digested pieces for mass, unthinking consumption) decreed that I should test the new Scenic. Despite my earnest pleas for leniency he was resolute, I think he may envy my loins; for while I have a wife, two progeny, notoriety and three cars- he has a mountain bike, haemorrhoids and low sperm count. My offers of unselfish insemination of his partner Marie at last year’s Christmas party, weren’t taken in the spirit intended and there and I am beginning to consider that my enmity is requited.
So off to the launch and there are various photos of happy families playing happy games and having happy times. Why even grand-mamma looks gleeful and gay; showing none of the resentment and rancour that usually accompanies even the shortest journey squeezed into the malodorous confines of a small people mover with both aging and not yet fully formed intestinal tracts. As a father myself I notice that there is no possible way that all the equipment could have been transported from home to happy place within the car itself, without resort to a step ladder and roof box (not shown). Much was made of the investigation and research done on how Renaults “friends” (nothing as base as a “customer” or “client” when using a Scenic obviously) use their current cars and how things could be improved. Many slides were produced (as was some truly awful cheese), but alas there was no replication of the wine crate loading so beloved by Mr Vicar in the Renault 16 launch of yore. To entertain myself I imaged Mr Bonomi and his boss Claire performing the can-can as the spoke, replete with musical accompaniment in my head. Ra-da, radada dad a, this now has a second hinge ra da, dadada hey, seven air bags, ra da da crappy plastics (oops sorry got a little carried away). The ordeal was a full hour long, with questions on top and as ever there was a junior reporter who ignored the dagger laden glares of her more elderly peers and asked a very hirsute chappy called Sebastian the safety expert, how they planned to maintain Renaults lead in the safety stakes. I could have clubbed her to submission with her recorder. The old gent from Autocar actually snorted in derision, but she continued. Waffle, upon piffle upon an empty stomach, never good before a drive.
And so to the drive (sadly once again pas de jaune), I can pleasantly report that it is as slow and as ponderous as you undoubtedly expect. There is a lolling and a rolling but easily cleaned fabrics and slippery seats so I can at least alarm the children adequately with a convincing sense of insanity when they misbehave. Nothing quietens the car more effectively than a rampant father yelling with ferocity, threatening all manner of punishment at trip’s end and a commitment to corners that would shame Alonso in a quest to arrive expediently to administer it. The steering is woolly and disconnected, the seats are fabulously comfortable and easily rearranged and there are all manner of small crevices for things to get lost in. Sensibly, Renault understand that mud will travel with no respect for gravity and also understand that it will only be cleaned by people who wouldn’t allow it to get dirty in the first place, so everything is as robust and as chamfered as any parent may hope. The centre stack resembles some sort baboon’s face with the hooded brow over the instruments and air vents for the nose. But a small thing, why can’t the instruments be in front of the driver? Is it so hard for them to assume the sight lines that ergonomic evolution has dictated? Flourish is fine, but would it not be better to have fewer airbags and better instrumentation?
The external shape and form is very plain, it puts the secret reviewer rather in mind of a tea pot. Functionally rotund is perhaps the best descr
03 July 2009 02:09
jetsetter says
licv44411 you mention reliability has improved since 2006. yes Clio, Modus and Twingo and possibly Laguna has improved(not enough retail Lagunas sold to tell yet!). However Megane and Scenic owners have been put off with window regulators, coils,egr valves,poor trim fitment, water leaks etc etc. The damage has been done and these owners have moved on to other brands. I am sure the new scenic is a good car. But to win back those lost customers it has to be better than good. Lets hope it proves to be a great car and wins back lost owners, retains its value and puts Renault to the front.
02 July 2009 22:55
jacomoseven says
Forget Saabs - architects and urban planners with families love these things. That may explain much of the under-whelming new build in our cities, of course.
Forget Saabs - architects and urban planners with families love these things.
That may explain much of the under-whelming new build in our cities, of course.
02 July 2009 12:08
livc44411 says
Excellent report I have to say!Well done...! Except for the last part about reliability. Most major reliability surveys actually show that all the latest Renaults from 2006 onwards (ie Clio,Twingo,Laguna,Kangoo) are no better or no worse than the competion and are on par with Ford and Fiat..
02 July 2009 11:55
Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.
Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)
Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.