Skip to content
Suzuki models, news & reviews
5
Handling
0
Performance
Usability
Feelgood factor
Readers' rating
3
By Ben Pulman
First Drives
21 November 2011 10:27
In an age when Clios and Minis have 200bhp, Golfs and Meganes sport 250bhp, and the hottest A3 and 1-series offer up over 300bhp, Suzuki’s new Mk2 Swift Sport is a breath of (modest) fresh air.
The four-cylinder engine remains at a mere 1.6 litres (naturally aspirated, of course), and despite it gaining a variable intake system and tweaked variable valve timing over its predecessor, as the Mk1 SS boasted just 121bhp, a 10% increase in peak power equates to a modest 134bhp. Peak torque is up too, but by just 9lb ft.
Meek numbers, but then the first Swift Sport was magnificent despite its lack of headline figures. Does the new car match up? Read on for our first drive review of the new Suzuki Swift Sport.
There’s stiffer front and rear suspension, new 17in alloys save a /kilo/ per corner, and there’s now a gearbox with a sixth gear. First through five remain tightly stacked, but the extra cog cuts emissions (from 165 to 147g/km), improves fuel economy (39.8 become 44.1mpg), and mean less frenetic cruising. At least that’s the theory; the reality is that acceleration still isn’t stellar, and you will still be pulling 3000rpm at 70mph.
The standard Swift’s design subtlety improved by a subtle bodykit, there’s room in the back for tall people (and the headrests actually extend high enough to support your head), and the boot’s not bad either. Add in improvements in motorway refinement (short gearing notwithstanding), loads of standard equipment (air-con, cruise control, electric door mirrors, Bluetooth, MP3 and USB connectivity, and seven airbags), and you’ve got a decent little hot hatch.
Our test route took us through mountains near Barcelona, the first heavy downpour in months leaving the roads rather slippery. There’s the tiniest hint of torque steer in first gear, but thereafter you can pin the throttle without fear of repercussions. Then shift, fast as you can, through the slick gearbox, right foot flat on the right pedal again just as soon as the cogs mesh, up to 7000rpm, engine happy to sing to the red, and roaring along nicely. Lift slightly for a blind crest or bend, or hard on the progressive, positive brakes, and then flat again.
The steering’s accurate, quick and direct, it’s nimble, there’s good chassis balance, but it’s a bit more comfortable and composed than the first Swift Sport. Still fun, though. Great fun. What broken Tarmac we could find revealed little wrong with the ride, there being just a slight patter from the secondary ride. Turn the ESP off and the hints of mild understeer mature in the atrocious conditions, but a mid-corner lift won’t see you spinning backwards off the road.
The more composed set-up has hardly compromised the handling, while all of the extra equipment only serves to broaden its appeal. And the like the first Swift Sport you never think about the Suzuki badge on the bonnet because you’re having such a good time.
Add your comment
Sign in You must be signed in to submit a comment.
Suzuki Swift Sport (2011) CAR review
Subject
Your comment
By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions
Cancel
You must be logged in to subscribe to a topic
Login or register now
Rodrigo says
RE: Suzuki Swift Sport (2011) CAR review
The suzuki badge has earned all the respect it deserves from amazing motorcycles, like the GXSR-1000 and the Hayabussa(best engine EVER). There is nothing wrong with Suzuki's market strategy and people that over spend for a badge make me sick. Having a luxury sedan or a "sport car" on a manufacturers line up does not make their base models faster or more refined, each model should be judged on it's on merit for performance, value, quality and reliability.
13 January 2012 09:35
zerozero says
@ Ben Pulman "Not a badge snob at all, merely an honest comment on the lack of kudos the Suzuki badge carries when it comes to hot hatches" We're not all the same however... The first Suzuki Swift Sport/GTi came out in the mid-80s, but the first one that caught my attention was the second generation one (early 90s), I remember Autocar gave it fantastic reviews and as a teenager I lusted after one, still do a little! After the great last generation Swift Sport, and the underated Ignis Sport, Suzuki really does know a thing or two about hot hatches. It must be the current 'TopGear' direction Car Magazine seems to be following lately.
30 November 2011 18:22
bertandnairobi says
Why is isn´t it fair to point out that the remark was not a valid part of a review? There needs to be a clear separation of vehicle testing (which this is) and commentary. I don´t think there are good grounds to mix up assessments of the intrinsic characteristics of a car and extrinsic factors such as what other people think of it. If this was the case the review would begin and end with "It´s just a Suzuki: no one rates them so don´t buy this car or else people will think you have no money or style. Get a BMW, everyone respects those." We all know that´s a preposterous extreme but that´s where it ends if you allow other people´s opinions into the range of parameters to be considered in car testing.
29 November 2011 21:25
dt26 says
I don't think it's fair for everyone to angrily pursue the badge snobbery idea...my take on the article and comments is that the Swift Sport (in both its iterations) has made great strides to improve people's perceptions of the brand which let's face it has put out some pretty horrendous products in recent years. I have driven a Jimny. It was not good. This is a very positive review by anyone's standards - if I remember rightly Car even made the previous Swift Car of The Year a few years back! Suzuki as a brand is not the default choice for hot hatch buyers but this will improve with good press coverage and open-mindedness in the general public. You have to remember the majority of people will go for a Golf over an Octavia or Leon without a moment's hesitation, even though they are very similar vehicles - that is pure badge snobbery!
29 November 2011 20:49
"Not a badge snob at all, merely an honest comment on the lack of kudos the Suzuki badge carries when it comes to hot hatches," wrote Ben Pulman earlier. I have to agree with the other comments; I think Ben Pulman´s remark is not a good defence. It really isn´t CAR´s job to tell us which car has "kudos" or not, certainly not in a review. All you´re doing is repeating other people´s opinions. I´ve been banging on this drum for years but no-one listens: other people´s opinions of a car into are not a valid part of an evaluation. The classic formulation of is this "Well made though it is and however nice it drives the main problem with this car is that image problem: who wants to pay £23,000 for a [name e.g. Ford, Peugeot, Skoda, Saab, Honda]." And? How does that matter for the car when the driver sits in it and uses it? Imagine if theatre was reviewed like this: "It might be a great play with fine acting but alot of people assume it´s not a good production so don´t go and see it." I suggest that you have a bit of a philosophical debate at CAR about this one.
"Not a badge snob at all, merely an honest comment on the lack of kudos the Suzuki badge carries when it comes to hot hatches," wrote Ben Pulman earlier.
I have to agree with the other comments; I think Ben Pulman´s remark is not a good defence. It really isn´t CAR´s job to tell us which car has "kudos" or not, certainly not in a review. All you´re doing is repeating other people´s opinions. I´ve been banging on this drum for years but no-one listens: other people´s opinions of a car into are not a valid part of an evaluation. The classic formulation of is this "Well made though it is and however nice it drives the main problem with this car is that image problem: who wants to pay £23,000 for a [name e.g. Ford, Peugeot, Skoda, Saab, Honda]." And? How does that matter for the car when the driver sits in it and uses it? Imagine if theatre was reviewed like this: "It might be a great play with fine acting but alot of people assume it´s not a good production so don´t go and see it."
I suggest that you have a bit of a philosophical debate at CAR about this one.
23 November 2011 15:46
Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.
Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)
Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.