Skip to content
Toyota models, news & reviews
4
Handling
3
Performance
Usability
Feelgood factor
5
Readers' rating
By Phil McNamara
First Drives
17 May 2011 09:28
The Toyota Prius Plug-in Hybrid is the 911 GT3 of the hybrid world: a more potent, focused, plug-in Prius, for the hardcore who want to sharpen their hybrid’s performance. Not by cutting the 0-62mph sprint, obviously, but by reducing the Prius’s CO2 emissions from 89g/km to less than 60g/km. How does the Toyota Prius Plug-in Hybrid work, and is it an improvement on the standard Prius? Read on for our Toyota Prius Plug-in Hybrid review to find out...
The breakthrough comes from more efficient lithium ion battery cells replacing the regular Prius’s nickel-metal hydride battery pack. Lithium ion cells have a superior energy density and can be recharged more quickly from a socket – hence the plug-in suffix. Toyota claims the cells can be charged in 90 minutes from the UK mains.With a full charge, the plug-in Prius can drive solely on electric power for 12.5 miles. That’s double the zero-emissions range of the nickel-metal hydride Prius and, with a threshold of 62mph, around twice the maximum speed before the petrol engine joins in. Toyota reckons that 80% of UK car journeys are less than six miles, which means the plug-in Prius could theoretically complete a return trip without the engine stirring.
The Prius can operate as both a series and a parallel hybrid. In series mode, the electric motor turns the wheels; when more power is needed, the motor works in parallel with the petrol engine. The difference with the plug-in Prius is that it works for longer in series mode. But there’s always the safety net of the petrol engine, which eliminates the range anxiety – the fear of being stranded by a depleted battery – of purely electric vehicles.Externally, the plug-in looks identical to a regular Prius, save for the flap above the front wheel arch that hides the charging socket. Under the skin the mechanicals are the same. There’s a 134bhp 1.8-litre four-cylinder petrol engine, supplemented by an electric motor yielding 153lb ft. Drive is sent to the front wheels via a continuously variable transmission.
Trundling around urban areas, you’ll struggle to coax the plug-in Prius out of electric-only mode. You don’t have to accelerate like an asthmatic snail – a decent span of torque will get you up to urban dual carriageway speeds without any drain on the liquid fuel tank. A horizontal bar displays how close you are to triggering the engine, allowing you to back off the throttle to avoid unnecessary emissions. This will be as effective a clamp on un-ecological driving as having a refugee from India’s drought region in the passenger seat. That said, if you stand on the throttle, you can get the engine seamlessly kicking in as low as 40mph. You’d just be missing the point.Despite driving Priuses for a decade, the novelty never abates of hearing nothing but the tyres’ gentle rumble while on the move. Though with the Mk1 and Mk2 Prius, you /did/ have to accelerate like an asthmatic snail (and a lightly cooked one, as air-con had to be used sparingly) for a moment of silent motoring. The Mk3 has made a big leap forward with its EV range, which the plug-in Prius enhances.
There’s one major problem: Toyota does not plan to commercialise the plug-in until it’s completed three years of research into the reliability and optimum size for the bigger, heavier lithium ion battery pack. Currently there are 600 Prius Plug-in Hybrids in a pilot fleet lease programme, and Toyota plans to offer the Plug-in Prius for sale in the second half of 2012. Here’s my instant feedback: get a move on, Toyota. It’s time we plug in, turn on, pop out.
Add your comment
Sign in You must be signed in to submit a comment.
Toyota Prius Plug-in Hybrid (2011) CAR review
Subject
Your comment
By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions
Cancel
You must be logged in to subscribe to a topic
Login or register now
lokinen says
RE: Toyota Prius Plug-in Hybrid (2011) CAR review
It's funny how people are always quick to point out the power station emissions without any mention of the horrific poisonous muck that's spews from an oil refinery..funny how you can't get a carbon figure for a gallon of fuel production, if you could it would be off the scale. The plug in Prius isn't about running the batteries out and then going onto petrol power, though actually my daily drive would't see the engine kicking in at all. The thing you can do with the plug in Prius is use the pulsing and gliding techniques for longer and faster, techniques the power and drive train are designed for.In the old one you were all done at about 42mph as that was the speed the two electrical motors were geared for.62 mph gives a far greater range and choice of location to practice these techniques.Remember the Car guys on the Brighton to London Eco run last year.They struggled to get the plug in Prius to register below 99mpg.From memory they settled on 102 mpg but reckoned it was better but for the vagaries of the fuel measurement and calculation system employed on the event.
10 September 2011 15:11
jer says
It's be damn useful transport. Would still need a second car to sate desire for performance.
08 September 2011 16:34
Sam the Eagle says
Jeez, it's like reading the Daily Mail over here today...
08 September 2011 12:15
carmobster says
12.5 miles? 80 % of UK driving less than 6 miles? If that is the case why are there traffic jams? If 80 % did less than 6 miles, we would walk or cycle. And Britain would be a perfect rainbowie fresh aired teletubbie world. Yeah right! I would like to see these research rapports. They propably interviewed old ladies of around 80. Maybe they got confused and put % behind age? Stop this plug-in hybrid thing nonsense. Keep developing the good 'ol petrol engine until there is a real alternative to it. Fiat's already at 85 g/km and Ford's new diesel also gets below 90 g/km. In the real world you can drive with the Toyota 12,5 miles at 0 emission, which is not true because plugging into the mains means plugging into a coal power plant. Most people who use a car drive at least 15.000 miles a year which means on average 41,1 miles a day of which 12,5 electric (partly dirty charge) the rest would be closer to double that with help from the not so clean and old 1,8 litre unit. It's simple math to see that the upcoming BMW 116d with below 99 g/km will be much cleaner in practice. Nice try, but get your facts straight Toyota. And so must you eco maniacs, trying to shove this through our throats. In the dark ages you could get hanged if you said the world would not come to an end or if it was not flat. Nowdays the "green religion" also predict the world will come to an end because of global warming. It is not true, we are not going to die. Nothing is wrong, eventually we will invent a good alternative energy source and everything will be fine. The world is round, not flat you know!
12.5 miles? 80 % of UK driving less than 6 miles? If that is the case why are there traffic jams? If 80 % did less than 6 miles, we would walk or cycle. And Britain would be a perfect rainbowie fresh aired teletubbie world.
Yeah right!
I would like to see these research rapports. They propably interviewed old ladies of around 80. Maybe they got confused and put % behind age?
Stop this plug-in hybrid thing nonsense. Keep developing the good 'ol petrol engine until there is a real alternative to it. Fiat's already at 85 g/km and Ford's new diesel also gets below 90 g/km.
In the real world you can drive with the Toyota 12,5 miles at 0 emission, which is not true because plugging into the mains means plugging into a coal power plant. Most people who use a car drive at least 15.000 miles a year which means on average 41,1 miles a day of which 12,5 electric (partly dirty charge) the rest would be closer to double that with help from the not so clean and old 1,8 litre unit.
It's simple math to see that the upcoming BMW 116d with below 99 g/km will be much cleaner in practice.
Nice try, but get your facts straight Toyota. And so must you eco maniacs, trying to shove this through our throats. In the dark ages you could get hanged if you said the world would not come to an end or if it was not flat. Nowdays the "green religion" also predict the world will come to an end because of global warming. It is not true, we are not going to die. Nothing is wrong, eventually we will invent a good alternative energy source and everything will be fine.
The world is round, not flat you know!
08 September 2011 12:08
V12 Migaloo says
Codex, My Journey to work is 7 miles. A distance you would think public transport would offer me a viable alternative to getting to work. It takes me 18 - 25 minutes to get to work by car. Whilst my car was being repaired I took the bus. It took me 12 minutes to walk to the bus stop, which upon arrival (2 minutes early) I had to wait 7 minutes for the late arrival of the bus. The bus journey took 54 minutes (standing next to a bloke who had either just run the marathon or hadn't had a bath in 3 weeks|) and then I had to walk 16 minutes from the stop to work. A total time of 1hr 29 minutes.... Utill public transport meets the needs of its users then I for one will stay lazy and selfish and hence people will continue to look to the car manufacturers to offer them a viable eco freindly alternative to the fosil fuel burning engine.
23 May 2011 13:59
Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.
Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)
Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.