Skip to content
Volkswagen models, news & reviews
4
Handling
3
Performance
Usability
Feelgood factor
Readers' rating
3.5
By Glen Waddington
First Drives
06 April 2010 15:29
Volkswagen hasn’t bothered to wreak the same transformation with the new Golf Estate as it did with the Golf hatchback, in the progression from Mk5 to Mk6. There are new engines, a new facia and a new nose, but the chassis and structure are pretty much left alone. So, should we feel cheated, or is a revamped old-shaped Golf estate satisfying enough?Sounds like VW’s been a bit lazy with the new Golf Estate. True?Well, you could say that, but then the estate is hardly a volume seller. In fact, the estate was never really a Golf at all: check out the old one’s grille, and the doors (which continue unchanged). They’re from the Jetta. So this is an estate version of the booted Golf, really.Confused? You should be. Especially when you remember this is the firm that once brought us the Bora Estate...Could they afford to leave the Golf Estate alone?The Mk5 Golf wasn’t exactly a bad car now, was it? In fact, the majority of the changes made to the Mk6 Golf hatch were done to make it cheaper to build. VW builds fewer estates, so the changes didn’t need to be as extensive, but the old car was hardly a looker and its interior was always a bit of a letdown after the plush Mk4’s. So in comes the Mk6 dash (but not its new doortrims), plus a Mk6 nose and more extensive body colour treatment. No, it’s still no looker, but at least the Golf Estate is a bit classier now, inside and out. It's the automotive equivalent of a bit of posh with a horsey face and a fat rump.How does the new 2010 VW Golf Estate drive?Very nicely indeed, but if you crave excitement, get back to your GTI. The TSI estate gets about its work with minimal fuss and fantastic ease. The light-pressure-turbo 1.4 has just enough oomph to get you about smartly and, while it’s a bit more audible at low revs here than it is in the hatch, it’s still an agreeably refined companion. Decently economical too: I managed bang-on 40mpg during a week book-ended by motorway cruising fully loaded (very fully loaded) with days in-between days spent nipping from town to town.>> Click 'Next' to continue reading our first drive review of the new VW Golf Estate (2010)
Add your comment
Sign in You must be signed in to submit a comment.
VW Golf SE 1.4 TSI Estate (2010) CAR review
Subject
Your comment
By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions
Cancel
You must be logged in to subscribe to a topic
Login or register now
lrcb40 says
RE: VW Golf SE 1.4 TSI Estate (2010) CAR review
I have the US spec, Mexico built 6 sp, 2.0 TDi and I really like this car. I was driving a 240hp Chevrolet and the fit and finish of the interior is superb (no, not a Skoda). It has many very thoughtful features and overall the package is a good mix of size, space, comfort, quality and cost. The engine pulls well because of the mountain of torque and I like that I can get 40+ mpg...
12 December 2010 15:34
Archibold says
I've got a 1.6tdi one of these on order, I really wanted an Octavia, I am an inverted badge snob, but the leasing deal was cheaper than the Octavia, so I chose the Golf, I am really confused. I spend all my time telling friends to choose a Skoda over a VW
23 June 2010 20:09
szoze says
I don't really understand CAR's comment "Volkswagen hasn’t bothered to wreak the same transformation with the new Golf Estate as it did with the Golf hatchback, in the progression from Mk5 to Mk6.". This new Estate IS Mk6 hatchback with extended back. The interrior of the Estate is identical to MK6 hatchback, the nose is the same, actually only the front doors and the back are left alone, everything else is different to MK5.
I don't really understand CAR's comment "Volkswagen hasn’t bothered to wreak the same transformation with the new Golf Estate as it did with the Golf hatchback, in the progression from Mk5 to Mk6.".
This new Estate IS Mk6 hatchback with extended back. The interrior of the Estate is identical to MK6 hatchback, the nose is the same, actually only the front doors and the back are left alone, everything else is different to MK5.
01 June 2010 21:22
Really nice looking car. For all the people making negative comments here: Don't judge it by seeing a couple of small photos. It looks much better in reality. And for the question about the dashboard: It is functional, ergonomic, feels good and has all the prerequisites to last. Great car, nice looking. Bravo VW!
Really nice looking car. For all the people making negative comments here: Don't judge it by seeing a couple of small photos. It looks much better in reality. And for the question about the dashboard: It is functional, ergonomic, feels good and has all the prerequisites to last.
Great car, nice looking. Bravo VW!
15 May 2010 16:09
clickysteve says
Why did they bother? We keep hearing how few they sell so VW didn't make much effort. Clearly. All they've done is nicked the best bits of the Octavia, popped the same old new dashboard on and laughed as the sheep go and buy one instead of well, anything else. And charge a premium for it. How do VW and Audi get away with the pretence of being premium cars simply by charging more for them? They fail more often than Skodas. They're not even more reliable than Opels and Citroens these days. I think it's about time all magazines stopped fawning over VWs and Audis and tried to review them against other cars and not preconceptions. Merc E-classes were always repsected as the taxi-drivers' choice - well, in my neck-of-the-woods you can't move for Octavias and Superbs with taxi-plates on. Never seen a Golf taxi. Waste of money.
08 April 2010 13:25
Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.
Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)
Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.