Skip to content

 
 

CAR Reviews

Click Thumbnails to Enlarge

Statistics

How much? £29,750
On sale in the UK: Now
Engine: 1986cc four-cylinder, 138bhp @ 4200rpm, 236lb ft @ 1750-2500rpm
Transmission: six-speed manual, front-wheel drive
Performance: 0-62mph in 10.9sec, top speed 119mph, 49.6mpg, 149g/km
How heavy / made of? 1774kg/steel
How big (length/width/height in mm)? 4854/1904/1740
Need to know

CAR's rating

Rated 4 out of 54

Handling

Rated 3 out of 53

Performance

Rated 3 out of 53

Usability

Rated 4 out of 54

Feelgood factor

Rated 4 out of 54

Readers' rating

Rated 2.5 out of 52.5

VW Sharan (2011) CAR review

By Al Suttie

First Drives

02 June 2011 13:00

The new VW Sharan slipped discretely into the MPV marketplace in 2010, replacing a people carrier that had been first launched in 1995. Back in the mid-90s, the Sharan was a product of a joint venture with Ford that saw the original Ford Galaxy, and the Seat Alhambra sharing the same platform. Ford went its own way in 2006, with a new Galaxy and S-Max sharing Mondeo underpinnings, but VW soldiered on with the existing Sharan.

Is the new VW Sharan worth the wait? How does it compare with the Ford Galaxy post-separation? Read on for our test of the VW Sharan to find out.

VW Sharan: packaging and layout

The 2010 Sharan might not look that different to the casual observer but the stats reveal its 220mm longer (including 75mm in the wheelbase) and 92mm wider than its predecessor, but 12mm lower and 30kg lighter too. It’s also more user-friendly: the rear doors now slide, and so do the middle row of seats, which move by up to 160mm and pivot by 20mm to make access easier to the third row of seats. Both rows of rear seats fold into the floor when not in use, Although there is a single-handed fold-down mechanism on the seats, it's a shame that the rearmost seats’ squabs still have to be flipped up manually when brought into play. Despite VW's claims that adults can ride in the back we found there’s still not enough room for adults’ knees back there either. 

The interior design and layout, as with the exterior, conforms to the modern VW rulebook. Crisp, logical, refined but bland. 

VW Sharan: power and performance

The Sharan might be larger but the new range follows the downsizing trend for its petrol and diesel engines.  The familiar VW 1.4 TSI petrol opens the range, and offers 148bhp and 177 lb ft of torque. That's 10bhp up, but around 10mpg down on the lower-tune 2.0 TDI 138bhp engine, which also musters a healthy 236 lb ft of torque. A 168bhp 2.0TDI, and a 197bhp 2.0TSI petrol complete the range. All engines are available with six-speed manual or DSG twin-clutch transmissions. Our test car was the 138bhp 2.0TDI that's expected to take the lion's share of Sharan sales, pictured in top-of-the-line SEL trim.

Driving the VW Sharan

The Sharan's rides very well, levelling rut-strewn roads with ease. Our Sharan had the standard fixed-rate dampers. Three-stage adaptive damping is a £775 optional extra, but given the relaxed demeanour of the engine and the comfortable ride on standard springs it seems unnecessary. There is also a £235 sports suspension option, lowering the Sharan by 15mm, but Sharan drivers should think of their passengers, embrace MPV ownership and stick with the standard set-up.

The dynamics trade-off comes in cornering, where the Sharan feels every gramme of its 1774kg. It's much-improved over its predecessor and thanks to the new Sharan's wider stance it has a more car-like feel to the driving experience than before. But the Ford Galaxy remains unthreatened as the MPV class driving benchmark, offering a greater sense of responsiveness and driver feedback over the Sharan.

Performance from the 2.0TDI engine is good, and we thought the DSG gearbox option suited the engine's relaxed demeanor better than the standard manual 'box. The Sharan comes with standard automatic stop/start and an energy regeneration system to help keep fuel economy and emissions competitive. Low wind, road and engine noise levels added up to an overall sense of refinement while driving the Sharan.

Verdict

The new Sharan is much improved, and with prices starting at £23,485 for the basic 1.4TSI it offers a potentially-appealing alternative to private buyers over the Galaxy or the value-brand Hyundai/Kia/Chevrolet MPVs. But we think the Ford Galaxy remains the more appealing choice as an equally-practical MPV that offers less-boxy style and a more satisfying driving experience.

1

Rate this article...

Average rating: Rated 2.5 out of 52.5 (25 votes)

Discuss this

Add your comment

VW Sharan (2011) CAR review

Subject

Your comment

By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions

Cancel

 

DJames

DJames says

RE: VW Sharan (2011) CAR review

I have just bought a Sharan, having compared it to a Ford Galaxy.  The Galaxy is surprisingly good to drive and is as big and comfortable as the Sharan, but the whole family was won over by the Sharan's classy, high-quality look and feel inside and its sliding doors, which make a lot of sense in a car park.  Both cars are very good but the Sharan felt special in a way that the Ford didn't so the decision could come from the heart as well as the head. 

Another major factor in our decision was the shoddy manner of our local Ford dealers, one of whom wasn't interested in arranging a test drive and another who did bother - but failed to fuel the car so it ran out halfway through the test drive!

16 July 2011 20:02

 

ashleylee

ashleylee says

RE: VW Sharan (2011) CAR review

 Yes Daleraider, I too tried Seat Customer Care and they were not very well informed (I'm being polite!) I actually knew more about the situation than the operative I spoke to. I have had a further conversation with the dealer, and they really have no idea what is happening so cannot tell me me where in the queue I am.

Bad form when you've ordered a car worth £32k+.

We did consider cancelling, but this car is the best option for us and we would most likely be disappointed with anything else. Will just have to be patient, but I wouldn't be surprised if the car turns up more than a year after we ordered it. If Seat (and therefore VW) are using the terrible events in Japan as an excuse (as Daleraider's info suggests) I find that at best immoral.

The story is very mixed up.

If the reason is that there is a problem with the camera, it suggest that they are waiting for the cameras before building the car. But they say they will build cars without the camera and retrofit later, therefore the lack of cameras is not a reason for the delay... Or am I missing something?

02 July 2011 21:04

 

bertandnairobi

reward badge

bertandnairobi says

RE: VW Sharan (2011) CAR review

I had a look at the photos more closely. They have the unsaturated, faintly soft look of analogue photography. They look better for it. I know some of the images might not be very arty but CAR could use some of this kind of artwork when showing back seats and boots and driver´s areas. It´s a bit literal but helps us see an unfamiliar design more easily. There´s space in a magazine like CAR for the arty and the explicit, I would say.

28 June 2011 14:33

 

bertandnairobi

reward badge

bertandnairobi says

RE: VW Sharan (2011) CAR review

I presume something like this will be printed in the magazine as well? If it is in the current edition, forgive me, as we don´t get this in Denmark until 3 weeks after UK release.

28 June 2011 14:20

 

Daleraider

Daleraider says

RE: VW Sharan (2011) CAR review

Have also ordered a SEAT Alhambra 2.0TDI 170PS SELux DSG for much the same reasons as ashleylee and was given a delivery date of 11th Sept. I was told in June that the delivery date may have to be put back to October. The reason I was given was they had not started building them because of a supply problem relating to the rear veiw camera coming from Japan due to the recent earthquake. The dealer told me they would not get the parts until 2012 so they will build the cars without the camera and arrange for them to be fitted later by the dealer and as a good will gesture give a £200 accessory voucher. Still haven't got a build week for my car so I phoned SEAT customer care who cannot access the delivery system, apparently it can only be done by the dealer. The story from them though was that the Camera was found to be faulty and SEAT was no longer associated with the manufacturer. After some digging I discovered the camera's were made in mainland China not in Japan. I wonder how long it will be before the motoring press pick up on the resons for the delays?

28 June 2011 14:17

Become a CAR contributor

Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.

Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)

June 2012 issue of CAR magazine
download bmw app

Become a CAR contributor

Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.