Skip to content

First Drives

Volvo S80 2.0 SE CAR review

By Peter Burgess

18 August 2008 13:40

The Volvo S80. There’s a name to conjure with, to roll around your tongue and to savour the depths like a complex Bordeaux. Who are we kidding? The S80 is one of that small clique of large cars that aspire to the premium level but always fall someway short of attaining the necessary desirability. But does that mean the Volvo S80 is a bad car, or even a not-very-good one?

Of course not, as hundreds of chauffeurs and taxi drivers will testify. Sitting in the back of an S80 after a night out is a very pleasant experience, even when sober. But bringing in the punters is still hard work so for 2008 Volvo has introduced new petrol and diesel engines, both four cylinder, both two-litres. The entry-level 2.0 petrol SE is a bargain £23,495.

Sounds a little compromised

Sticking a two-litre Mondeo engine into an S40 might sound like a reasonable proposition, but you’ve a right to be concerned about the same 143bhp unit in the bigger, heavier S80. Power isn’t really the issue. The S80 can cruise reasonably well on the motorway, one- or two-up, and at higher revs the engine feels lively and responsive. It may seem unseemly to drive a car like this on the gearbox but it’s a solution some of the time.

Where the S80 stumbles so miserably is in urban conditions. Torque is in short supply at the best of times but at low revs it seems paltry. That leads to some oh-my-God moments pulling out from road junctions where acceleration feels even slower than the 0-60mph time of 11 seconds implies. That’s with just the driver on-board. With a full compliment of passengers it could get scary.

Click 'Next' below to read more of our Volvo S80 2.0 SE first drive

Click Thumbnails to Enlarge

Statistics

How much? £23,495
On sale in the UK: Now
Engine: 1999cc, 143bhp@6000rpm, 140lb ft @ 4500rpm
Transmission: 6-speed manual, front-wheel drive
Performance: 11.0sec 0-60mph, 127mph, 34.0mpg, 199g/km CO2
How heavy / made of? 1565kg/steel
How big (length/width/height in mm)? 4851/1861/1493
Need to know

CAR's rating

Rated 3 out of 5

Handling

Rated 3 out of 5

Performance

Rated 2 out of 5

Usability

Rated 3 out of 5

Feelgood factor

Rated 3 out of 5

Readers' rating

Rated 3 out of 5

Page

Rate this article...

Average rating: Rated 3 out of 5 (8 votes)

Discuss this

Add your comment

Volvo S80 2.0 SE CAR review

Subject

Your comment

By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions

Cancel

kkirkou

reward badge

kkirkou says

RE: Volvo S80 2.0 SE CAR review

In Greece, and in some other markets I'm sure, we could have the previous S80 with the 2.0 lit 5 cylinder turbo from the S60 with around 200 bhp, and it was a great big family car in relatively good price. Why don't they do the same now? This 4 cylinder is barely adequate for a S40, never mind a S80...

24 August 2008 16:29

Vilagos

reward badge

Vilagos says

RE: Volvo S80 2.0 SE CAR review

To answer Brand0's question, the Volvo USP which most attracts me are the seats. Now that GM no longer deigns to put proper seats in Saabs, Volvo has the best seats in the business. And the one part of the car used 100% of the time are the seats. Once you are used to the best, anything else becomes offensive. I wish I could speak more directly about the ownership experience in Europe, but in the States, Volvo is one European make with consistently human dealers (unlike the German brands,) and good reliability (unlike Audi, which has many former owners in the States, myself included, who'd never buy another due to inexplicable, out of warranty, catastrophic failures at minimal mileages.) As for looks, once you are in the car, you can't see it, and the interiors are quite pleasant and practical. As a transportation tool, Volvo's have a lot going for them, without insulting your intelligence at any point.

19 August 2008 18:45

Brand0

reward badge

Brand0 says

RE: Volvo S80 2.0 SE CAR review

Either way you look at it, £25k is a lot of money to spend on a car that won't raise your pulse when you look at it. Volvo's USP of safety may still be good, but the market has caught up sufficiently to render it nothing too special. So what does Volvo represent nowadays?

19 August 2008 11:30

Archibold

reward badge

Archibold says

RE: Volvo S80 2.0 SE CAR review

Who called the cops?

19 August 2008 09:53

kubrick

reward badge

kubrick says

RE: Volvo S80 2.0 SE CAR review

Hydestein - the S80 is (as far as I know) based on the current Mondeo's platform, while the XF uses the old S-Type's with some XJ components added, so any similarities are incidental. Not a single piece of sheet metal is shared. Gascon - Erika is a true beauty. I'm very, very fond of the Pagode, which is my all-time favourite Merc, together with the W112 Coupé/Convertible. Ah, those were the days, when the likes of Paul Bracq designed absolutely stunning shapes for the three-pointed star... while, just a few minutes ago, I've had to wash my eyes after having a look at what's supposed to be genuine photos of next year's new E-Class. But back to the Pagode (her German name, no spelling mistake)...

19 August 2008 09:41

Become a CAR contributor

Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.

Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)