Skip to content

 
 

Green cars

Click Thumbnails to Enlarge

Statistics

How much? £22,858
On sale in the UK: Now
Engine: 1597cc 4-cyl, 156bhp @ 5200rpm, 170lb ft @ 3000rpm
Transmission: Five-speed automatic (£1125 option), rear-wheel drive
Performance: 9.9sec 0-62mph, 138mph, 39.8mpg, 169g/km
How heavy / made of? 1485kg/steel
How big (length/width/height in mm)? 4581/1770/1447mm
Need to know

CAR's rating

Rated 3 out of 53

Handling

Rated 3 out of 53

Performance

Rated 4 out of 54

Usability

Rated 4 out of 54

Feelgood factor

Rated 4 out of 54

Readers' rating

Rated 3 out of 53

Mercedes C180K BlueEfficiency (2008) CAR review

By Ben Whitworth

First Drives

08 December 2008 19:00

Mercedes has been a little slow off the mark with its environmental campaign, but hopes it range of new BlueEfficiency cars – spearheaded by the C180K BlueEfficiency on test here – will do for emissions, economy and public perceptions what EfficientDynamics has done for BMW. And there’s no price penalty for opting for the BlueEfficiency model – in fact at £22,585 it’s actually £815 cheaper than the standard C180K model it replaces (although that includes the recent 2.5% VAT cut).

What is this Mercedes BlueEfficiency all about?

BlueEfficiency is the umbrella term Mercedes uses to describe the optimization of aerodynamics, use of lower rolling resistance tyres, lightweight design and energy management to cut fuel consumption and slash emissions.

Rather than roll out a set number of eco-initiatives across its range, each class gets a set of bespoke BlueEfficiency measures that suits it best. So the C180 K gets a thinner windscreen, lighter but more effective noise insulation material, lightweight forged alloy wheels for a 32kg weight reduction, bespoke Michelin tyres with 17% less rolling resistance and a intelligent energy management system.

There's also a number of body tweaks - smaller exterior mirrors, complete with LED arrow-shaped indicator lenses, a smooth underbody, enhanced panel seals, lowered suspension and a partially blanked grille – for slipperier aerodynamics. Oh, and lighter, smaller 1.6-litre engine…

What? A tiny 1.6 lump in that car. It must be slower than a slug…

It’s no tyre-smoker, but if no one told you, you’d never know that there was such a small powerplant under the bonnet. That’s because despite the 200cc drop in capacity, performance - 156bhp at 5200rpm and 170lb ft at 3000rpm – remains unchanged but now with significantly better economy and emission levels. With a useful 170lb ft of torque kicking in at 3000rpm – bang on the nose for powering past middle-lane dawdlers on the motorway – performance is brisker than you’d expect given the engine’s modest size and outputs.

Click 'Next' below to read more of our Mercedes C180K BlueEfficiency first drive

12Next>>

Rate this article...

Average rating: Rated 3 out of 53 (57 votes)

Discuss this

Add your comment

Mercedes C180K BlueEfficiency (2008) CAR review

Subject

Your comment

By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions

Cancel

 

joe-hxc

reward badge

joe-hxc says

RE: Mercedes C180K BlueEfficiency CAR review

Luk333 no offence but you dont no how the car feels to crive its been said in the article that the 1.6 copes well so whats the point raising an issue that has already been solved ???

21 February 2009 21:08

 

luk333

luk333 says

RE: Mercedes C180K BlueEfficiency CAR review

What's next for Christ's sake? 1.2 3-cyl turbo which still will be sold as 180Kompresor, but will go under 100g/km?

13 December 2008 08:49

 

comment8

reward badge

comment8 says

RE: Mercedes C180K BlueEfficiency CAR review

I got my figures from mercedez-benz.de as the weights seem to be missing from the UK web site. Perhaps the UK version is de-contented in some other way...

12 December 2008 01:58

 

benwhitworth

reward badge

benwhitworth says

RE: Mercedes C180K BlueEfficiency CAR review

Comment8 - Odd, as my figures from Mercedes show a 32kg drop in weight. Tony - I think one line that mentions public perception hardly qualifies as 'crowing on about the relevance of image', does it? I've looked at some weights - a BMW 320i weighs in 1445kg, the Merc I tested weighs 1485. Some way off the 100kg you mention. But good point well made about the transmissions - Mercedes should have its seven-speed automatic as an option on all its models...

11 December 2008 10:21

 

comment8

reward badge

comment8 says

RE: Mercedes C180K BlueEfficiency CAR review

BTW Ben, Mercedes are claiming a 10kg weight saving over the 200K....

11 December 2008 02:39

Become a CAR contributor

Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.

Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)

CAR magazine June issue 611
Untitled Document

Become a CAR contributor

Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.