Skip to content
BMW models, news & reviews
4
Handling
5
Performance
Usability
Feelgood factor
Readers' rating
3.5
By Anthony ffrench-Constant
First Drives
07 June 2012 09:30
CAR's already driven the new 2012 BMW 3-series in best-selling 320d diesel form (click here for our 3-series review). But now we've let our columnist Anthony ffrench-Constant loose in the petrol 328i.
Read on for Anthony's off-beat blog review of the new BMW 328i. And for CAR Magazine's comprehensive guide to the new F30 BMW 3-series, click here.
Idly watching a fencing demonstration by a quicksilver aspirant to Britain’s Olympic elite at the recent launch of this new F30-era BMW 3-series (cue the new TV ad), I was interrupted by the murmured sidlings of a BMW grand fromage who endeavoured to entice me away with the lure of the company’s latest ConnectedDrive technology…
In other words, shunning the high-quality swashing of buckles, did I wish him to demonstrate the means by which you turn the modern car into a mobile office at the stab of diverse buttons? ‘Er… No thanks.’
He looked more than somewhat startled by my reply, so I explained: a GP all his working life (in the days when doctors actually visited the homes of ailing patients), my father refused to have even so much as a mobile phone on board. And this was because - the inevitable time and motion Horlicks notwithstanding - the privacy inherent in each journey was absolutely sacrosanct.
He could (and did) pick his nose; listen to The Archers; watch the seasons scroll in through the windscreen; spend time alone inside his own head; Heaven forefend, even enjoy the simple pleasures of driving… Anything but have his personal space invaded by the outside world.
It’s a dictat to which I have steadfastly adhered. To this day, all I ask of a car is a good stereo, air-conditioning, occasional sat-nav and, reluctantly, Bluetooth phone connectivity. Any other technology, particularly that which requires me to pull off the road and sip vile services coffee to use it, falls strictly into the not-wanted-on-voyage category.
Now, I do realise that this – allied to absolutely no urge to make loud, self-important mobile phone calls to reluctant recipients whilst on a bus twixt long-term car park and airport terminal at 6.30 in the morning - makes me something of a dinosaur, but, in truth, all I really ask of a car is a good drive.
Happily, both the £29,060 BMW 328i and the £28,080 BMW 320d I sampled constitute very, very good drives indeed. And, in the context of both cars, my lack of interest in superfluous technological frippery would simply save me the cool £12,000 worth of extras appended to each machine…
Even more happily, handsome BMW couture is back. Despite pedestrian impact legislation forcing bonnets ever higher, the nose still gives great groundhog and the front is very elegant indeed. With flanks mercifully free of over-much pressed metal peregrination and the back a simple, generic BMW stern, the whole is handsome indeed.
The new 3-series looks bigger and is bigger, now catching up with extant 5-series dimensions, until the latter inevitably swells too. But, with rear-seat accommodation notably improved, the only real downside to this an enforced revision of my preferred driving position…
This is the first time I’ve climbed aboard a BMW and not wanted the seat and wheel set as low as possible. I think it’s a measure of just how big the new 3-series has grown that I can’t instinctively find the corners of the car with the seat set as low as I’d like, and have to raise myself quite a bit before I feel in charge rather than merely on board.
That aside, my only gripes are an interior design that still falls short of the car’s exterior in the elegance stakes, a ridiculously recalcitrant sat-nav system, the absence of a turning knob adjustment to the seat back, electric indicator stalk operation, and an absurd real wood trim finish clearly modelled on a supermarket-bought Yule log confectionery.
To drive, however, both machines are largely faultless and utterly peerless. The 328i petrol engine is, sadly, no longer a straight-six but merely a 2.0-litre turbo; its slightly more frenetic efforts at delivering sparkling, 5.9 seconds to 62mph performance the only real giveaway.
Eight-speed (oh, for heaven’s sake) automatic transmission means that the thing is forever shifting cogs, but the changes are smooth enough for this not be intrusive. In manual guise, the new 2012 BMW 320d proves equally efficient, its slower acceleration times belying the in-gear oomph of 280lb ft of torque.
Steering, brakes, ride quality, grip, handling… Every other aspect of the new 3-series constitutes a proper improvement over the saloon’s predecessor, already a highly involving and entertaining drive.
I’d have a new BMW 3-series like a shot. Just don’t ask me to use it as my office, please.
Add your comment
Sign in You must be signed in to submit a comment.
BMW 328i (2012) - CAR's BMW 3-series review
Subject
Your comment
By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions
Cancel
You must be logged in to subscribe to a topic
Login or register now
carmobster says
RE: BMW 328i (2012) - CAR's BMW 3-series review
@philj; thanks for the article. It is what you read every month in the issue of CAR magazine of long termers; no car reaches even near it's reported fuel consumption. Even worse is that while some cars have a better fuel economy according to the EU cycle test in practice they use more fuel than their counterparts who were less clean and economical according to this EU cycle test. This is why in the same 'Auto, Motor und Sport' magazine they also tested Fiats priced twinair engine against the old and ageing 1.2 naturally aspirated one. The most economical? The old 1.2 litre.
@philj; thanks for the article. It is what you read every month in the issue of CAR magazine of long termers; no car reaches even near it's reported fuel consumption. Even worse is that while some cars have a better fuel economy according to the EU cycle test in practice they use more fuel than their counterparts who were less clean and economical according to this EU cycle test.
This is why in the same 'Auto, Motor und Sport' magazine they also tested Fiats priced twinair engine against the old and ageing 1.2 naturally aspirated one. The most economical? The old 1.2 litre.
08 June 2012 13:36
bucharesta says
I mourn the demise of the straight six - it felt good to drive and sounded good as well. Downsizing to four cylinders is, in my humble opinion, a backward step that diminishes the overall driving experience.
07 June 2012 15:55
Sam the Eagle says
Trim is crucial - surely there is a wide range on offer?
07 June 2012 15:46
Gregg218 says
I had the opportunity to sit in a new 3-series and also was very dismayed at the wood trim. Certainly, were I currently in the market for new car I would want a 3 but only if in another trim. It looks cheap and felt nasty.
07 June 2012 15:36
philj says
Have to agree with carmobster, it is also worth reading Andrew Frankel's piece from Motorsport: http://www.motorsportmagazine.com/road-cars/opinions/co2-emissions-the-truth/
Have to agree with carmobster, it is also worth reading Andrew Frankel's piece from Motorsport:
http://www.motorsportmagazine.com/road-cars/opinions/co2-emissions-the-truth/
07 June 2012 14:52
Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.
Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)
Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.