Skip to content
BMW models, news & reviews
3
Handling
Performance
4
Usability
Feelgood factor
Readers' rating
By Tom Bird
First Drives
08 July 2009 10:21
BMW has done what it said it would never do and made M versions of its SUVs – the X5 M and the X6 M. And we’ve just driven the more expensive – and less practical – of the two, the £77,425 X6 M.
The X6 M has a twin-turbo 4.4-litre V8 with a common exhaust manifold – a world first – that produces a significant 547bhp and a thick 501lb ft slug of torque available throughout most of the rev range. The run to 62mph takes just 4.7sec and top speed is a limited 155mph – though if you opt for some BMW Driver Training as part of a special M Driver’s package, it’ll get raised to 175mph. That's crazily fast for a 2.4-tonne SUV...
Fast for sure, but not mind-blowingly so. You have to use the Launch Control System – yes really, an SUV with launch control – to hit that acceleration time from standstill. However, it’s the mid-range surge that’s most impressive. Plant the throttle in any gear and the X6 M hunkers down and throws itself forward.
It’s no M3 or M5 that’s for sure, no matter how many times BMW might harp on about the X6 M being a true M car. It’s not. It’s a big, heavy SUV and unfortunately feels it when you start to chuck it about. Part of the X6 M’s problem is just how good the lesser-engined models are to drive. I was all against the X6 when it was first announced, but was seriously impressed when I first drove one. With the X6 M though, I was let down.
The X6 M doesn’t feel as agile as the rest of the range and that’s due to the extra weight it’s carrying. It tips the scales at 2380kg – 115kg more than the xDrive50i. And that car’s no slouch either; it’ll hit 62mph in 5.4sec. Under heavy braking the X6 M feels like it’s standing on its nose and can become a little unsettled. Punt it through some tricky corners and the weight really becomes apparent. However, there’s very little body roll to speak off thanks to the electronically adjustable dampers. There’s absolutely loads of grip, though.
Unfortunately not. The X6 M is four-wheel drive and feels it. Torque is shifted between all four of the X6 M’s wheels through the clever Dynamic Performance Control system, but it’s never fully rear-drive. Throw it too hard into a corner and the X6 M juggles the power and you end up experiencing understeer, followed by a nice neutral balance, then just tipping into slight oversteer before everything gets beautifully back in control, all without any tyre-burning drama. It also sounds pretty rubbish, the V8 emits a deep grumble but it’s not going to raise the hairs on the back of your neck like an M3 or M5 can.>> Click 'Next' to read the rest of CAR's BMW X6 M first drive review
Add your comment
Sign in You must be signed in to submit a comment.
BMW X6 M (2009) new CAR review
Subject
Your comment
By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions
Cancel
You must be logged in to subscribe to a topic
Login or register now
suvblogger says
Re: BMW X6M 2009 CAR review
The X6 M makes about as much sense in the current climate as wading through snow in a pair of flip flops. It’s pricey, heavy and impractical, but ridiculously fast and fun, a combination that from many angles is very hard to resist. And as with many such vehicles, history is likely to judge it rather well. Best Regards Shreya Mehta
The X6 M makes about as much sense in the current climate as wading through snow in a pair of flip flops. It’s pricey, heavy and impractical, but ridiculously fast and fun, a combination that from many angles is very hard to resist. And as with many such vehicles, history is likely to judge it rather well.
Best Regards Shreya Mehta
26 July 2011 07:40
barina47 says
RE: BMW X6 M (2009) new CAR review
Apart from the seemingly pointless trip to the tackiest "we'll make you ugly" chop shop in the USA, [for the roof], straight after that now very ugly E class, this thing has ginormous wheel arches and pee wee wheels!!! Why?? There could be some tiny redemption if the thing was lowered 1 - 1.5 inches, but as it stands, it looks STUPID!!
08 February 2010 08:56
ema02 says
I guess the innovation on the exhaust manifold really did it great. I wonder what would happen to the performance if an exhaust tip will be added as well.
22 December 2009 02:06
DrPep says
@ga41 It's been an absolute hoot! Very pleased with it as an all rounder, although if you do serious mileage or spend a lot of time on the motorway then it's probably not ideal given the fuel cons. (~24mpg) and firm ride. Overall, the handling is sublime thanks in no small part to the RWD setup and weight distribution. Personally its ideologial perfection for me (big engine, relatively low weight, rear wheel drive). Criticisms? A slip diff wouldn't go amiss and might improve its manners on less than perfect road surfaces, although its never too big an issue. Well worth a test drive at the very least. I'll be sure to check out the forums - thanks!
22 July 2009 00:06
ga41 says
@DrPep How's life with a 130i? I was considering one for a while but ended up with something else from BMW. I'd love to read more about your little pocket rocket in the forums. Feel free to join us.
17 July 2009 08:20
Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.
Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)
Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.