Skip to content

First Drives

Mercedes GLK350 CAR review

By Georg Kacher

First drive

21 April 2008 09:43

It's been a long wait, but we've finally driven Mercedes' new junior off-roader, the GLK. And we can confidently say Stuttgart’s latest offering is an off-roader because CAR has been mud-plugging in the GLK - and beating its big brother M-class driven by Mercedes’ own instructors.

Still, the GLK has to prove an awful lot if it’s to compete in the burgeoning mid-sized SUV sector. Surprisingly - for Mercedes - the GLK is very late to market (don't forget the original M-class was launched before the BMW X5 and its ilk). But BMW retaliated with the prescient X3, and everyone from Chevrolet to Volkswagen now has something to offer in this market.

A new X3 is also under development, and Audi has just unveiled its Q5. Tough times ahead for the GLK? We’re about to find out...

Just what is the Mercedes GLK all about?

Think of it as the smaller offspring of the iconic G-class. Although there are hints of current GL in the looks, it strikes us as very 1980s. The GLK is very boxy and it's a little too aggressive for our tastes, with those box-flat sides and distinctive creases. But for some it might be the perfect car, with looks to scare other mums on the school run.

Boxy on the outside, boxy on the inside?

Of course. The interior is slightly more subtle than the exterior - but it still looks as if it's built from bricks. A lot of the parts are lifted from the C-class, so the ergonomics are fundamentally sound. And there are improvements over the C-class too, such as the door-mounted seat controls. Much more intuitive.

The (optional) multi-media Comand screen now sits integrated into the top of the dashboard, unlike the C-class’s pop-out-and-up item. Space and practicality nearly match the M-class, but unfortunately the GLK is let down by materials that aren’t deserving of this class.

Right, the GLK's an off-roader but I don’t care about plugging mud. What’s it like trundling along?

Pretty darn good. The biggest surprise is the ride comfort, which is soft and cosseting, despite the GLK having impeccable body control. Thank Mercedes’ Agility Control system (think fancy shock absorbers) which know when to smoothe and soothe, and when to tighten and firm. Combine the clever shocks with decent mechanical grip, the 4Matic’s four-wheel drive traction and 45:55 rear-bias, and the GLK is surprisingly entertaining to drive.

Click 'Next' below to read the rest of our Mercedes GLK 350 drive

Click here to see the first official pictures of the Audi Q5

Click here to read why the GLK will be  built in right-hand drive

 Click Thumbnails to Enlarge
Need to know

CAR's rating

rating is 4

Handling

rating is 4

Performance

rating is 4

Usability

rating is 5

Feelgood factor

rating is 4

Readers' rating

rating is 3

Statistics

How much? £40,000
Engine: 3498cc V6 24v, 268bhp
Transmission: Seven-speed automatic, four-wheel drive
Performance: 6.7secs 0-62mph, 144mph, 27.2mpg, 230g/km
How heavy / made of? 1830kg/steel

Page

Rate this article...

Average rating: rating is 3 (17 votes)

Discuss this

Add your comment

Mercedes GLK350 CAR review

Subject

Your comment

By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the Car Magazine website Terms and Conditions

Cancel

Goatboy

reward badge

Goatboy says

Wrong week to give up sniffing glue..

I think I’ve finally worked out the design brief. Clearly M-B design bosses decided they needed a 4WD Diahatsu Grand Move look-alike to stamp their authority on the compact SUV market and show BMW just how pig-ugly the X3 is. And, well – you’d have to agree they nailed the brief to perfection. This vehicle shows just how savvy the boys in Stuttgart have become in deducing that what the world needs right now is an overgrown Tonka toy that requires several days of determined solvent abuse in order to even look at the thing. And while I'm here, I’m noticing an excess of tact in the descriptions of new cars these days. We had Ben Chapman rhapsodising about the looks of the Peugeot 308 the other day, and Georg Kacher minding his P’s & Q’s on the GLK launch here. Are the car companies PR’s gaining the upper hand Mr Editor?

22 April 2008 10:50

haitham

haitham says

WTF!!!

Piece of crap car... pointless... ugly... drives like crap( suv mercs) go do something usefull mercs! like a real drivers car!

21 April 2008 23:42

Talbot5667

reward badge

Talbot5667 says

One for the Chinese

Pretty sure Merc designed this for the Chinese and Yanks. Hideous inside and out, should bomb convincingly in Europe, unless the 3-pointed star transends all. I think this effort vindicates BMW's X6. BMW have created something genuinely new, whilst Merc have given us their take on a 70's US truck. I'd put money on the X6 outselling the GLK, despite the price differential.

21 April 2008 21:45

JohnnyBimmer

reward badge

JohnnyBimmer says

Who Let the Dogs Out II

The interior looks hunky and chunky but maybe overdosing on shiny plastic. This 350 really does shifts with pretty good m.p.g. for a 4x4 and the ride sounds like it combines taughtness with comfort really well. Good news over. It was designed by a trainee oregami beginner who started on a cardboard box and left a quarter of the way through for the toilet. It looks like a Subura Forester design sketch that didn't make the final cut. Whoof!

21 April 2008 21:41

MAX25

reward badge

MAX25 says

awful awful awful awful

From the front it looks like someone has tried unsuccessfully to prise the bonnet open with a large screwdriver, and from the back an engorged early model Subaru Forester. Why on earth GLK and not MLK? Is extra utility what this market is looking for from a late entrant? This looks more like a Defender competitor than Freelander, never mind pulling people from their X3s and Q5s. MB is completely lost at sea...

21 April 2008 20:59

Become a CAR contributor

Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.

Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)