Skip to content
Mercedes-Benz models, news & reviews
4
Handling
Performance
Usability
5
Feelgood factor
Readers' rating
2.5
By Georg Kacher
First Drives
21 April 2008 09:43
It's been a long wait, but we've finally driven Mercedes' new junior off-roader, the GLK. And we can confidently say Stuttgart’s latest offering is an off-roader because CAR has been mud-plugging in the GLK - and beating its big brother M-class driven by Mercedes’ own instructors.
Still, the GLK has to prove an awful lot if it’s to compete in the burgeoning mid-sized SUV sector. Surprisingly - for Mercedes - the GLK is very late to market (don't forget the original M-class was launched before the BMW X5 and its ilk). But BMW retaliated with the prescient X3, and everyone from Chevrolet to Volkswagen now has something to offer in this market.
A new X3 is also under development, and Audi has just unveiled its Q5. Tough times ahead for the GLK? We’re about to find out...
Think of it as the smaller offspring of the iconic G-class. Although there are hints of current GL in the looks, it strikes us as very 1980s. The GLK is very boxy and it's a little too aggressive for our tastes, with those box-flat sides and distinctive creases. But for some it might be the perfect car, with looks to scare other mums on the school run.
Of course. The interior is slightly more subtle than the exterior - but it still looks as if it's built from bricks. A lot of the parts are lifted from the C-class, so the ergonomics are fundamentally sound. And there are improvements over the C-class too, such as the door-mounted seat controls. Much more intuitive.
The (optional) multi-media Comand screen now sits integrated into the top of the dashboard, unlike the C-class’s pop-out-and-up item. Space and practicality nearly match the M-class, but unfortunately the GLK is let down by materials that aren’t deserving of this class.
Pretty darn good. The biggest surprise is the ride comfort, which is soft and cosseting, despite the GLK having impeccable body control. Thank Mercedes’ Agility Control system (think fancy shock absorbers) which know when to smoothe and soothe, and when to tighten and firm. Combine the clever shocks with decent mechanical grip, the 4Matic’s four-wheel drive traction and 45:55 rear-bias, and the GLK is surprisingly entertaining to drive.
Click 'Next' below to read the rest of our Mercedes GLK 350 drive
Click here to see the first official pictures of the Audi Q5
Click here to read why the GLK will be built in right-hand drive
Add your comment
Sign in You must be signed in to submit a comment.
Mercedes GLK350 (2008) CAR review
Subject
Your comment
By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions
Cancel
You must be logged in to subscribe to a topic
Login or register now
Grant0610 says
RE: Mercedes GLK350 CAR review
Ok, sounds like the M-B GLK is a very capable car but I am not going to beat about the bush but who in their right mind would drive around in a Mercedes that looks like a Mazda Demio?? It is AWFUL looking! I know a car should not be based purely on looks but on this occasion I think it has to be a huge consideration. It ain't cheap either! I guess it aimed squarely at the American market where what a car looks like is not important.
Ok, sounds like the M-B GLK is a very capable car but I am not going to beat about the bush but who in their right mind would drive around in a Mercedes that looks like a Mazda Demio?? It is AWFUL looking! I know a car should not be based purely on looks but on this occasion I think it has to be a huge consideration.
It ain't cheap either!
I guess it aimed squarely at the American market where what a car looks like is not important.
22 April 2009 23:45
Goatboy says
Wrong week to give up sniffing glue..
I think I’ve finally worked out the design brief. Clearly M-B design bosses decided they needed a 4WD Diahatsu Grand Move look-alike to stamp their authority on the compact SUV market and show BMW just how pig-ugly the X3 is. And, well – you’d have to agree they nailed the brief to perfection. This vehicle shows just how savvy the boys in Stuttgart have become in deducing that what the world needs right now is an overgrown Tonka toy that requires several days of determined solvent abuse in order to even look at the thing. And while I'm here, I’m noticing an excess of tact in the descriptions of new cars these days. We had Ben Chapman rhapsodising about the looks of the Peugeot 308 the other day, and Georg Kacher minding his P’s & Q’s on the GLK launch here. Are the car companies PR’s gaining the upper hand Mr Editor?
22 April 2008 10:50
haitham says
WTF!!!
Piece of crap car... pointless... ugly... drives like crap( suv mercs) go do something usefull mercs! like a real drivers car!
21 April 2008 23:42
Talbot5667 says
One for the Chinese
Pretty sure Merc designed this for the Chinese and Yanks. Hideous inside and out, should bomb convincingly in Europe, unless the 3-pointed star transends all. I think this effort vindicates BMW's X6. BMW have created something genuinely new, whilst Merc have given us their take on a 70's US truck. I'd put money on the X6 outselling the GLK, despite the price differential.
21 April 2008 21:45
JohnnyBimmer says
Who Let the Dogs Out II
The interior looks hunky and chunky but maybe overdosing on shiny plastic. This 350 really does shifts with pretty good m.p.g. for a 4x4 and the ride sounds like it combines taughtness with comfort really well. Good news over. It was designed by a trainee oregami beginner who started on a cardboard box and left a quarter of the way through for the toilet. It looks like a Subura Forester design sketch that didn't make the final cut. Whoof!
21 April 2008 21:41
Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.
Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)
Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.