Skip to content
Mercedes-Benz models, news & reviews
4
Handling
Performance
3
Usability
Feelgood factor
Readers' rating
By Anthony ffrench-Constant
First Drives
03 May 2012 05:28
Mercedes updated its M-class SUV in 2011, offering a fresh take on its Alabama-built 4x4 with new platform, styling and notably-downsized powertrains. Have they leapt to the head of the premium SUV class with the latest edition? Anthony ffrench-Constant evaluates the four-cylinder diesel ML250 Bluetec Sport to find out...
Speed Limit Assist? No thank you. Active Lane Keeping Assist? Not right now. Active Blind Spot Assist? My neck works fine, thanks. Intelligent Light System? Night View Assist PLUS? Not at three in the afternoon, pal. Attention Assist? Look, I wonder if you’d be good enough to just f…In an increasingly irascible attempt to assess honest mechanical engineering rather than sly, over-solicitous electronics, I became so distracted by my efforts to switch everything but the engine of the new Mercedes M-Class off again that -but for the very systems I was frantically trying to disable- Tow Truck ‘n’ Germoline Assist might well have been called into play at any moment.
Same as it ever was… Every new Mercedes I’ve driven of late has lumbered to the launch pad groaning under the weight of Ahem-sir-is-looking-a-tad-tired-why-not-pull-over-for-a-steaming-cup-of-coffee-and-a-quick-snooze-Assist type safety systems and the occasional hot air scarf hatched several decades too late to save Isadora Duncan.Now, given that these diverse NannyTronics are almost entirely optional and may be switched off anyway (e…ven…tu…a…lly), this state of affairs could not justifiably constitute a beef of any stature but for one system I simply could not shut down and another –which I desperately wished to sample- that wasn’t fitted to the car at all.The former is called Presafe Brake, or somesuch. Permanently active whether you like it or not, it specialises in chastising the driver who trundles too close to the car in front, first with warning lights and then with automatic braking. An unsolicited dab of anchor is not ideal when you’re just pulling out to overtake, as I have so far discovered in the new CLS, C-Class Coupe and M-Class.The latter is called an Active Curve System. An option to compliment the adaptive damping of the car’s optional air suspension, it employs active front and rear anti-roll bars to keep the M-Class flatter than a Lancashire vowel through the bends, whilst dialling out their influence on straights to maximise comfort. And this, given Mercedes’ avowal to pitch the new M-Class head to head with the dangerously able Range Rover Sport, makes it worth a look...
Sadly, we weren’t allowed to sample it first hand, but a couple of lunch loss-threatening laps at the hands of ex-DTM and Dakar pilot Ellen Lohr suggested that the system works admirably, with none of the gently perceptible, pre-activation lurch on turn in which has tended to hallmark such technology to date.Truth be told, the ML’s handling has improved dramatically even without the help of active anti-roll bars. Body roll has been well shackled under all but the most strenuous of circumstances, with minimal loss of straight line ride comfort. The latter is undoubtedly abetted by the most comfortable seat to grace any 4x4, even if the door and centre console armrests are set an irritating whisker off the same level.
The Mercedes still falls a whisker short of the full Imperious offered by the Range Rover Sport and, though its new electromechanical steering may be efficient, it’s hardly involving. However, the big car may now be hustled down sweeping A roads with a degree of vim and a level of involvement that is entirely new to a Mercedes SUV.Under the bonnet, efficiency now rules the M-Class roost. The 500 V8 went west last year, and even the 350 V6 petrol engine won’t make it to the UK in the new Mercedes. So that leaves us with the simple choice of 250 and 350 BlueTEC diesels and the new 5.5 litre Bi-turbo AMG unit.
The 250 BlueTEC unit makes its first appearance in the M-Class. It’s a 4-cylinder, 2.2 litre twin-stage turbodiesel developing 201bhp and 369lb ft of torque via a 7-speed automatic gearbox. And the excitement it generates has everything to do with it making the M-Class the only posh 4x4 to emit less than 160g/km of CO2, and very little indeed to do with the driving experience.With the exception of some unwarranted vibration at around 1800rpm, the engine’s adequately smooth and refined, and will haul over two tons of car along quite adroitly in the cruise. It is, however, somewhat lacklustre in the overtaking stakes, and response to kick-down appears to require written notification, in triplicate, before even contemplation of compliance. Hardly the armoury with which to take the fight to the Range Rover Sport.Then again, sales of the once ubiquitous Supercharged V8 Sport have now reached anvil-off-a-cliff status, so it would seem that even those who can afford the purchase price of said leviathan are now gently swayed by such piffling concerns as cost of ownership and running, piecemeal, for the cover of a V6 diesel.
In this context, and even powered by a sewing machine, the new M-Class makes a far more convincing proposition than its predecessor. It’s better looking and more comfortable, and handles better both on and off road. And with prices starting from around £45,000, it’s not that much more expensive to boot.
Add your comment
Sign in You must be signed in to submit a comment.
Mercedes ML250 CDI BlueTec Sport (2012) CAR review
Subject
Your comment
By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions
Cancel
You must be logged in to subscribe to a topic
Login or register now
oopnorth says
RE: Mercedes ML250 CDI BlueTec Sport (2012) CAR review
Saw one parked up the other day - looked quite bland and without presence - previous model looked better I think
15 May 2012 12:07
stormypetrol says
RE: Mercedes ML250 BlueTec Sport (2012) CAR review
Like Poisson, I think the old one was probably better-looking. We enjoy the 430 V8 of our 1999 model immensely. Yes, it's a 12-year-old car now and shocks are getting a bit worn. But what great overall quality! Makes the plebs down below in their newer hatckbacks look pretty silly... This thing cost half their price second-hand. (Japan is full of fine used Mercs)
04 May 2012 08:26
Johann says
Like most new Mercs this thing is just diabolical to look at! That fat ar$e over the rear wheels... the awkward C-pillar, the Merc sedan rear lights... But at least there are no Chris Bangle style lines running left right and centre over the doors not lining up with anything logical. Even the headlight silhoettes are in proportion to the car... But alas that is as much praise as I can give this thing. (Guess the design was signed off before Bangle started working at Mercedes).
03 May 2012 15:54
wittgenfrog says
Indeed. 'Same as it ever was...'
03 May 2012 13:17
Poisson says
I find this a rather strange review, but perhaps not unexpected in this site. You have "tested" the smallest-engined, lowest powered version of a 2-tonne four wheel drive and talked at length about its handling and performance. Let's get realistic - provided it goes round corners safely, handling is not going to be a priority for those who buy this car. Likewise, provided it can accelerate up to traffic speed in reasonable fashion, that's about what you'd want from such a small engine in such a big car. Your point about overtaking and kick-down is interesting and relevant here in Oz where most long distance trips are on two-lane highways where 53m road trains need to be overtaken safely. I would also question your comment that the new model is better looking. It's subjective, certainly, but the old one was distinctive and attractive and not likely to be confused with any one of half a dozen Asian competitors.
I find this a rather strange review, but perhaps not unexpected in this site. You have "tested" the smallest-engined, lowest powered version of a 2-tonne four wheel drive and talked at length about its handling and performance.
Let's get realistic - provided it goes round corners safely, handling is not going to be a priority for those who buy this car. Likewise, provided it can accelerate up to traffic speed in reasonable fashion, that's about what you'd want from such a small engine in such a big car. Your point about overtaking and kick-down is interesting and relevant here in Oz where most long distance trips are on two-lane highways where 53m road trains need to be overtaken safely.
I would also question your comment that the new model is better looking. It's subjective, certainly, but the old one was distinctive and attractive and not likely to be confused with any one of half a dozen Asian competitors.
03 May 2012 11:17
Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.
Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)
Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.