Skip to content

 
 

CAR Reviews

Click Thumbnails to Enlarge

Statistics

How much? £20,900
On sale in the UK: Now
Engine: 1598cc 16v turbocharged 4-cyl, 181bhp @ 5500rpm, 177lb ft @ 1600-5000rpm (192lb ft with Overboost at 1730-4500rpm)
Transmission: Six-speed manual, front-wheel drive
Performance: 7.0sec 0-62mph, 141mpg, 47.1mpg, 139g/km CO2
How heavy / made of? 3734/1683/1390
How big (length/width/height in mm)? 1185kg/steel
Need to know

CAR's rating

Rated 3 out of 53

Handling

Rated 4 out of 54

Performance

Rated 4 out of 54

Usability

Rated 3 out of 53

Feelgood factor

Rated 3 out of 53

Readers' rating

Rated 2 out of 52

Mini Roadster Cooper S (2012) CAR review

By Ben Pulman

First Drives

31 January 2012 09:00

This is the new Mini Roadster, and it’s the penultimate Mini model (the Countryman-based Paceman arrives in 2013) before a whole new range of baby Brits start to appear in 2014. The Roadster is a mix of what we already know, combining the more rakish windscreen of 2011’s controversial Coupe with the drop-top body of the Convertible. Is it any good? Read on for CAR’s first drive review of the new Mini Roadster to find out.

So is the Mini Roadster just a convertible version of the Mini Coupe?

Not quite. Both feature a more steeply raked windscreen than the standard Mini hatch and Convertible, but the Roadster is actually based around the Convertible’s body-in-white, which is then stiffened around the rear axle. And efforts have been made to differentiate the new Roadster from the Mini Convertible: it’s only got two seats instead of four; the soft-top is 20mm lower and much more rakish at the rear than the Convertible’s boxy back end; and rather than retracting (electrically) like a sunroof, then (electrically) folding back, the Roadster’s hood is a full DIY item.
You unclip the latch on the header rail, then heft it back over you head – it folds flush with the flat rear deck, rather than concertinaing like a pram’s hood on the Convertible. To put the roof back in place, a button between the rollover bars releases the locking mechanism, before you manually heave it back into place. Either operation requires a bit of muscle (and getting out of the car unless you bend in some amazing ways), and although much is made of the manual operation, it’s no surprise to learn that automatic operation is an option – and standard fitment in the UK. All you have to do is latch or un-latch the roof.

Like the Coupe, the Roadster sports a bigger boot than its more sensible sibling (now 240 litres; was 125) but like the Coupe the boot floor isn’t flat. It’s also got the same pop-up rear spoiler as the Coupe, and an optional wind deflector clips between the roll hoops, and together they combine to create pretty poor rear visibility. As on the Convertible, the Always Open Timer keeps a count of just how many minutes you drive around with the roof down – for what purpose we don’t know. As on the Convertible, over-the-shoulder visibility is poor too.

I presume it’s the same engines as the rest of the Mini range?

Right again. There are three petrol 1.6s, with either 121bhp, 181bhp (Cooper S) or 208bhp (John Cooper Works), or the Cooper SD model with a 141bhp 2.0-litre diesel. Mini expect the Cooper S to account for the majority of sales, and as that was the only model brought to the launch, it’s the one tested here.

A twin-scroll turbo boosts the Cooper S and JCW models, and here there’s 177lb ft available from just 1600rpm so you never need to rev the Roadster all the way out to its red line. Of course the four-pot engine doesn’t sing, but it rasps merrily enough and occasionally pops on a downshift.

The Sport button (standard on the JCW, optional on the other modes) adds weight to the steering and sharpens the throttle response, and it’s a must if you want to start chucking the Roadster around. Forget to engage it and the wheel’s weighting is too light on initial turn-in, the engine feels a bit flat, and you can’t nail a good heel ‘n’ toe shift with the well-placed pedals. That’s only if you’re pressing on mind, otherwise it’s fine around town and on the motorway.

There’s a little chassis flex over badly rutted Portuguese back roads, but it feels stiffer and more driver-focused than the Convertible thanks to the additional rear bracing. The ride is typically firm, but it’s not crashy (all the test cars were fitted with 16in wheels on 195/55 rubber) and the payoff is sharp turn-in and good body control.

Anything else?

Occupants of Porsche’s limited edition 911 Speedster, with its lower windscreen and correspondingly lower side windows, suffer more buffeting than the regular 911 Cabriolet, and it’s the same story in the Mini Convertible. But chief amongst the problems is that the small rear windows have been junked so if you’re anywhere over six feet tall your ears will be back behind the rear of the glass and subject to lots of roar.

The inside of the roof isn’t exactly pretty when it’s raised either, with no lining to cover the metal supporting beams, and the point where the trailing edge of the windows seals with the roof suffers from excessive wind whistle too.
As for the interior, I’m hardly spoiling the surprise if I reveal the dashboard is identical to every other Mini bar the Countryman. What once was a paragon of quality is now feeling its age with the arrival of Audi’s A1, and although the materials used are better than, say a Mazda MX-5, everything is quite dark and hard.

Verdict

The sharpest handling Minis still have fixed roofs, but the Roadster is good fun to drive. However, it’s compromised like the Convertible, and like the Convertible it’s much more a fashionista’s choice. Whether you’d pick it over its more conventional drop-top sibling comes down to whether you value a bigger boot and the latest looks of spring/summer 2012 catalogue over four seats and more refinement. The difference is £505 in the Convertible’s favour, but all things considered we’d lean towards the Roadster if you’re in the market for either.

1

Rate this article...

Average rating: Rated 2 out of 52 (10 votes)

Discuss this

Add your comment

Mini Roadster Cooper S (2012) CAR review

Subject

Your comment

By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions

Cancel

 

ronwhite

reward badge

ronwhite says

RE: Mini Roadster Cooper S (2012) CAR review

 Can't help but feel that Mini are s-q-e-e-z-i-n-g every last drop out of the current hardware before the next generation rolls along.  Which it will need to do pdq, as the current generation is not only ubiquitous, but also starting to look pretty ho-hum (and it's about time they got rid of that silly cyclops speedo --it was witty at first, but like most such arch bits of humour, is no longer amusing) .  Am not sure why one would spend good £££ on a coupe or a roadster, as neither is especially attractive and both are compromised by being sported up, hard riding Minis. Wouldn't it be good if VW rolled  out one of its teaser small sports cars?  Or is the UP GT as far as they're going to go along this particular path?  

01 February 2012 16:27

 

Mercman

reward badge

Mercman says

RE: Mini Roadster Cooper S (2012) CAR review

Batty - seems to me the same could be said about the Porsche 911 - does this mean you view Porsche's efforts with it over the decades a failure?  Strong continuing stream of customers seems to suggest otherwise. 

Must it be revolution not evolution in styling?  Would we want a MINI that was just another supermini sized car (like the original became when the design was moved on to be the Metro which ended up as the Rover 100)?

Certainly the technology beneath the MINI's skin is starting to need an update but that is on the way and doesn't mean you need to throw out the concept or key styling cues.

01 February 2012 10:45

 

Batty

reward badgemoderatorstaff

Batty says

RE: Mini Roadster Cooper S (2012) CAR review

You can add many different flavours to rice and it is exciting for a while, but eventually you get tired of eating it. I think Mini has become like that. When you enter the circuitous route of retro design, where do you go? BMW need to be brave with Mini now they have re-established the brand and stop rehashing yesterday's dinner.

31 January 2012 22:18

 

JohnnyD

reward badge

JohnnyD says

RE: Mini Roadster Cooper S (2012) CAR review

@carmobster - Would the Rocketman concept have reawaken that 2001 feeling?

 

I like the look of the Roadster but surely it now makes the normal convertible redundant?

31 January 2012 16:05

 

carmobster

reward badge

carmobster says

RE: Mini Roadster Cooper S (2012) CAR review

It doesn't look bad, but competition is catching up. In 2001 when the first generation was launched (todays model still uses the same chassis!) it was out of this world to drive and to look at. You had to buy something with a Porsche badge to get the same specialness.

 

Nowdays, the quality, the weight, the ruined steering (first gen had a lot of feel!) and even the economy and CO2 figures are losing ground towards competition.

I want to feel like I did in 2001 when I bought my first new MINI. It made me all warm inside and happy.

Nowdays that role had been taken by the Evoque. That's why I just ordered one.

So come on MINI, do your best and I might consider one again.

31 January 2012 14:30

Become a CAR contributor

Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.

Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)

CAR magazine June issue 611
Untitled Document

Become a CAR contributor

Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.