Skip to content
Porsche models, news & reviews
5
Handling
Performance
Usability
4
Feelgood factor
Readers' rating
By Ben Pulman
First Drives
21 November 2011 09:23
Either this is the moment you’ve been waiting for since the first 991-spec Porsche 911 prototypes were spotted testing on the road back in 2008, or you should look away now as we drive the first of many iterations of the new generation rear-engined icon.
And rear engined it still most obviously is: that silhouette is unmistakable. The sleeker rear lights are almost concept car-esque, but actually make the rear look rather narrow; the nose is wide though, and looks odd with the goatee black plastic chin spoiler. And even on the Carrera S the central intake is blanked off – Boxster and Cayman S models get triple intakes.
Read on for CAR’s first drive review of the new Porsche 911
So, highlights of the all-new 991-generation Porsche 911 please…
The 3.8-litre flat-six has gained 15bhp so the Carrera S now has 395bhp produced 900rpm higher, there’s an extra 15lb ft 1200rpm higher, and with the seven-speed dual-clutch PDK gearbox and the optional Sport Chrono Pack it’ll hit 62mph in 4.1 seconds. And thanks to the extensive use of aluminium the Carrera S (with PDK) is 45kg lighter than the old car.
It’s the car we’ve tested, but the £10k cheaper Carrera now has a 3.4 rather than a 3.6-litre engine. The power output is up (340bhp at 6500rpm is now 345bhp at 7400rpm; 288lb ft is unchanged but now produced at 5600rpm rather than 4400rpm) but emissions and fuel consumption have dropped so this is Porsche’s cleanest ever sports car: 34.5mpg and 194g/km with the PDK ‘box.
Common to both is a clever thermal management system, trick generator controller, a stop/start system, while the manual gearbox has seven speeds, and the PDK ‘box has a coasting function that decouples the engine and lets it idle if you’re off the throttle. It’s similar to the system on the Audi Q3, so you start to freewheel, so you brake, and the system instantly couples back up to provide engine braking. Defeats the point really.
Spacious. There’s an extra 100mm between the front and rear axles, and despite the roofline being 6mm lower, there’s a huge amount of space. Our test car was fitted with heated and ventilated electric seats, but you sit as low as you’d ever like, lanky lads no longer bash their knuckles on their knees when turning the wheel, and even Georg Kacher wouldn’t complain about the headroom despite the fitment of the optional sunroof. Okay, only (small) children still fit in the back, but it feels almost /too/ big up front.
Quality levels have taken a huge leap forward, but if you’re expecting a fresh interior then the sat-nav, the dials and a myriad of buttons will be familiar to 997 owners – this new 911 isn’t /all/ new. And if you’re a fan of the workmanlike, upright interior of every 911 ever, then the Cayenne and Panamera-inspired sloping centre console might not to be your taste. Oh, and I can’t stand the electric handbrake or electric steering column adjustment.
Leather, climate control, bi-xenon lights, a seven-inch sat-nav screen, MP3 and USB connectivity are standard on the Carrera, while the Carrera S gains inch bigger 20in wheels, adaptive dampers, and the Porsche Torque Vectoring system (it selectively brakes the inside rear wheel) with a limited slip differential.
Let’s start with the steering, which is now electro-mechanical. The first turn of the (strangely big) wheel will scare you, so light is the steering – it’s there to aid low-speed manoeuvering but feels very odd when the 997 was instantly weighty and direct. It’s much, much better at speed, but some of that wonderful feel has been damped away. You’ll learn to live with it, but there are many other things you can learn to live with but don’t necessarily want to have in your life. If you’ve never driven a 997 you’ll think it’s wonderful; if you’ve been lucky enough to be behind the wheel of a GT3 then it’s instantly obvious that that delectable feel is missing.
Next the engine, and while the new car is a little faster in a straight line, most obvious is higher red line: for the first few hours I was shifting up in the sixes using the paddles, rather than letting the engine rev around to nearly 8000rpm. And the engine note is new too: the howl is more muted, more refined, but the noise is louder and fuller (helped by a Sound Symposer that pipes the engine noise into the cabin) and in a very un-Porsche way it pop and crackles on the overrun.
The PDK ‘box shifts with a little more of an emotive kick, the ride (at least with the adaptive dampers set to Normal) is supple, the Sport button strikes the best gearbox balance between Normal’s eco bias and Sport Plus’s track-focussed setting, the standard steel brakes are still brilliant, and there’s less understeer. The rear-engined layout means this latest 911 still bucks and weaves – even if it is more composed through corners – and you’ll forever be amazed by how early you can get on the power.
It’s more refined, more comfortable, and more economical than ever before, but what really matters is that it still has that unique 911 feel and character. The outgoing Carrera GTS is more interactive and involving, but this new Porsche 911 isn’t far behind – while offering up a much broader range of talents to a bigger audience.
Get up to 40% off all Bauer magazine subscriptions in our christmas offer - click here
Add your comment
Sign in You must be signed in to submit a comment.
Porsche 911 Carrera S (2012) CAR review
Subject
Your comment
By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions
Cancel
You must be logged in to subscribe to a topic
Login or register now
daveandrews13 says
RE: Porsche 911 Carrera S (2012) CAR review
As is the evolutionary nature of the car (good point Johann), they aren't going to give you the full bells and whistles from day 1 and deprive magazines the world over of the 'Best 911 ever' monthly headline. Sure it's great if you're in the market for one but it's just so similar. Still when Porsche design does cut loose (Cayenne and Panamera) this is clearly better for everyone with eyesight.
21 November 2011 20:43
beeahr says
Re blanked-off central intake. The 987 Boxster S central intake is a dummy. So's the side intake on the left side, come to that. Porsche does do styling, a bit, and the new 911 looks good to me, outside and in. But it's how it drives like that really matters.
21 November 2011 16:34
jacomoseven says
It's a strange launch, this. Was disappointed not to see an eight page review in this month's magazine - presumably printing schedules didn't allow it. But - for Porsche - it means that online reviews are dribbling online, lacking sufficient depth or context to explain the new technology and new focus of this car. Objectively it sounds way better at as a daily prospect and makes all other sub-£100k coupes look redundant. And I'm sure the very wealthy Porscheophiles will already have their orders in. But for the rest of us, who aspire to a 911 one day, it doesn't seem as enticing or engaging as it could be. Shame.
It's a strange launch, this.
Was disappointed not to see an eight page review in this month's magazine - presumably printing schedules didn't allow it. But - for Porsche - it means that online reviews are dribbling online, lacking sufficient depth or context to explain the new technology and new focus of this car.
Objectively it sounds way better at as a daily prospect and makes all other sub-£100k coupes look redundant. And I'm sure the very wealthy Porscheophiles will already have their orders in. But for the rest of us, who aspire to a 911 one day, it doesn't seem as enticing or engaging as it could be. Shame.
21 November 2011 14:01
rigidjunkie says
Related to the interview in last month's mag I have to disagree with the designer. Having PORSCHE on the rear is terrible. The 911 in the nice flowing font looks great, but the very Germanic square PORSCHE looks out of place on thsi car. Is there any doubt it is a Porsche? Never! A Panamera, sure, any Porsche SUV? yes a thousand times. But the 911 and even the Cayman/Boxster do not need the company name on them. I am dissapointed to hear the steering is not where ti should be, when I heard Porsche was going electric on the 911 I assumed they had figured out eletric steering and everybody could learn from them. This does not sound to be the case. The interior looks terrible, following the Panamera and Cayenne feels like a bad move for the 911 and Caymen/Boxster I fear. One of the great things about a 911 is the feel of the interior being high quality, BUT designed to make the driver faster. No silly design to look flashy, just a very well made place to go fast. This is what makes the car date so slowly.
Related to the interview in last month's mag I have to disagree with the designer. Having PORSCHE on the rear is terrible. The 911 in the nice flowing font looks great, but the very Germanic square PORSCHE looks out of place on thsi car. Is there any doubt it is a Porsche? Never! A Panamera, sure, any Porsche SUV? yes a thousand times. But the 911 and even the Cayman/Boxster do not need the company name on them.
I am dissapointed to hear the steering is not where ti should be, when I heard Porsche was going electric on the 911 I assumed they had figured out eletric steering and everybody could learn from them. This does not sound to be the case.
The interior looks terrible, following the Panamera and Cayenne feels like a bad move for the 911 and Caymen/Boxster I fear. One of the great things about a 911 is the feel of the interior being high quality, BUT designed to make the driver faster. No silly design to look flashy, just a very well made place to go fast. This is what makes the car date so slowly.
21 November 2011 13:37
Johann says
Shall we take bets now on how many of these CAR will test over its lifespan? When a grommet is changed, new test, mauve painted brake callipers, new test, contrasting colour stitching to the seats, new test... yawn. Lovely car mind. But why oh why give it a steel sunroof?!?! How old fashioned is that?! Guess it is to leave some reason for the future Targa to exist (and be tested).
Shall we take bets now on how many of these CAR will test over its lifespan? When a grommet is changed, new test, mauve painted brake callipers, new test, contrasting colour stitching to the seats, new test... yawn.
Lovely car mind. But why oh why give it a steel sunroof?!?! How old fashioned is that?! Guess it is to leave some reason for the future Targa to exist (and be tested).
21 November 2011 13:07
Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.
Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)
Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.