Skip to content
Renault models, news & reviews
3
Handling
Performance
Usability
Feelgood factor
Readers' rating
3.5
By Anthony ffrench-Constant
First Drives
20 April 2009 10:30
Ho hum… Another day, another compact family MPV. Only this time we really should sit up and pay attention at the back. After all, Renault started the whole boiling with the first Scenic back in … oh, 1873, and three generations on - and having finally found sufficient brand confidence to drop the Megane moniker - you’d expect Renault to have pretty much got everything absolutely right.
Largely, yes. It’s a relatively simple formula; cram the most flexible seating possible for up to seven into a box with wheels, add 27 cupholders, and style it. Yet it’s amazing how many cock-ups still make it to the launch pad: Nissan’s Qashqai+2, for instance, boasts third row seats into which you can’t load children without mithering between doors and tailgate, whilst sporting the anatomical properties of Kali to boot. This is what happens when you leave engineers alone in darkened rooms for too long, like mushrooms…
Happily, Renault appears to have given the Grand Scenic job to engineers who have actually emerged from their moist compost for long enough to have families. Third row seats flail merrily up and down like a hermit’s fist with a simple tug of a cheery red strap and, even if the headrest doesn’t quite reach the required height, there’s adult headroom here.
Three independent, equal sized second row seats slide to and fro through 170mm to allow rugby prop forward shoulders to overlap, and the backs adjust for rake. A simple, one-tug lever folds each one flat, and then forwards, for third row access. Perfectly comfortable despite added narrowness, each seat can be removed altogether without recourse to a hernia truss. Though the resultant loadspace isn’t fully flat due to sensible third row footwell requirements, its volume does expand from 564 to a cavernous 2063 litres. Finally, fold the front passenger seat forwards for the successful stowage of record marlin, even after rigor mortis has set in.
The new Grand Scenic is predictable awash with ‘storage solutions’, said to number 42 in all. Most, such as both front and rear floor bins, under seat drawers, a chilled, 11 litre glovebox and a sliding centre console, are wholesome. But there’s too little phone, fags and femininity stowage round the gear lever, where you actually want it, the front door pockets have been so stylised that an embossed diagram is required to show you how to insert even a water bottle (honest), and one particular tray (No. 41?) adjacent to the instrument binnacle is barely big enough to house your prize marble.
>> Click 'Next' below to read more of our Renault Grand Scenic first drive
Add your comment
Sign in You must be signed in to submit a comment.
Renault Grand Scenic 1.4 TCe (2009) CAR review
Subject
Your comment
By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions
Cancel
You must be logged in to subscribe to a topic
Login or register now
Steill says
RE: Renault Grand Scenic 1.4 TCe (2009) CAR review
This looks like a facelift rather than an all new car. The biggest gripe is that central binnacle, which leaves the main instruments on the wrong side of the car for RHD. You gat a great view of the radio display while passengers can tell you what speed you're doing and what revs. I think it's dangerous to have these so far off the line of sight, and I was caught speeding because I had accelerated away from a hazard without having had time to look halfway across the car to see how much speed I'd gained. The digital speedo doesn't give you any impression of speed that you get from a dial without needing to look directly at it. Given that the whole dashboard has to be re made for RHD, why can't the binnacle be placed in front of the driver?
27 April 2009 16:41
bertandnairobi says
Even by Mr ffrench-Constant´s usual standards, this text is incredibly hard-boiled. The "hermit´s fist" remark is cheeky (and reminds me that one of the print journos sneaked "MILF" into one of his articles.) It was a little hard to read - that´s what I´m trying to say. About the car: it looks quite harmless but not as nice as the last version. Is Mr Pelota controlling the design staff by placing a shotgun in their mouths? It looks like it.
Even by Mr ffrench-Constant´s usual standards, this text is incredibly hard-boiled. The "hermit´s fist" remark is cheeky (and reminds me that one of the print journos sneaked "MILF" into one of his articles.)
It was a little hard to read - that´s what I´m trying to say.
About the car: it looks quite harmless but not as nice as the last version. Is Mr Pelota controlling the design staff by placing a shotgun in their mouths? It looks like it.
24 April 2009 13:49
daveandrews13 says
It's so boring I can't be bothered to read the article. Is it a facelift or new?
20 April 2009 18:22
a t o m i c says
So, to sum up, the Renault Grand Scenic 1.4 TCe (2009) is a bitch, and you spanked it?
20 April 2009 14:45
jacomoseven says
Is it not a little depressing that - 25 years after the Espace - this is where Renault has got to? A perfectly fine people carrier, but the refinement of a concept that worked just as well in 1984. It's more efficient, which is welcome, but where's the progress?
20 April 2009 11:13
Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.
Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)
Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.