Skip to content
Subaru models, news & reviews
4
Handling
5
Performance
Usability
Feelgood factor
Readers' rating
4.5
By Ben Pulman
First Drives
28 March 2012 09:10
This is the new 2012 Subaru BRZ coupe. Developed in conjunction with Toyota (which will sell its version as the GT86, and as the Scion FR-S in the USA) it’s a rear-wheel drive sports car that does things a little differently…
Rather than compensating for a lardy kerbweight with a powerful engine, and then fitting fat tyres to cope with the extra power, Subaru (and Toyota, though it’s the former that has done all the development and engineering work) has gone back to basics and made this car as light as possible, and made the centre of gravity as low as possible. Which means it doesn’t even have the 200bhp that any self-respecting hot hatch must possess these days. Is it any good? And is it the right decision?
Read on for CAR’s first drive review of the new Subaru BRZ sports car.
The clue is in the name: BRZ. The ‘B’ stands for boxer engine, the ‘R’ for rear-wheel drive, and the ‘Z’ for zenith. That last letter might be a tad presumptuous, but the promise of B and R mean the BRZ might well deliver. The boxer engine is compact, light, and most importantly the horizontally opposed cylinders guarantee a very low centre of gravity for the 2.0-litre engine. And the boxer engine is mounted in a compact (at a mere 1285mm tall it’s 19mm lower than a Porsche Cayman) and light (1239kg) car. And drive is sent to the rear wheels, via a six-speed manual gearbox (or a six-speed auto if you must) and a Torsen differential.
Enough to get you excited, but there’s more… The 2.0-litre flat-four is naturally aspirated for a crisper throttle response, and it sit as low in the chassis as possible (with two people on board the centre of gravity is just 460mm high). The biggest wheels and tyres you can order are 17in alloys wrapped in 215/45 R17 Michelin rubber. And if you’re really keen, in 12 months' time Subaru will sell a de-contented version ripe for tuning – it’ll do without air-con, a radio, the Torsen differential, every sort of automated or electric goody, and come on 205/55 R16 tyres.
Bring it on!
From the moment the boxer engine gruffly thrums into life the BRZ feels like a Subaru, and as you slot first (in the tad notchy gearbox) and feel the vibrations through the ‘stick that impression is only increased. That engine note always remains on the rough side, and it’s only above 4000-5000rpm that it becomes more layered, louder and appealing.
The upper reaches of the rev range are where you head to really get the BRZ going. Pootle around and you’ll wonder what the appeal is, but crank it up and you’ll love it. The limits are relatively low so the tyres are soon squealing without the need to travel at silly speeds.
The BRZ is quick and keen to change direction, nicely balanced, and while the ride is no doubt firm on bumpier roads, the pay-off is excellent body control.
For such a lightweight car the steering is actually surprisingly heavy, weighting up especially after the first few degrees of turn as the electric system plays its part. Like the latest Porsche 911 that nth degree of feel doesn’t exist, but it’s sharp and quick and so good that any negatives never register while you’re driving.
In iconic WR blue mica paint it looks every inch a Subaru, but the reality is that the styling was all done by Toyota, and without that legendary hue it’s just a tidy (if generic) little sports car. Subaru officials know this, admit this officially, and then just smile and ask if you enjoyed driving it… Subaru’s STi tuning division is working on a set of more aggressive exterior mods, plus suspension and exhausts upgrades, but it sounds like they’ll be limited to the Japanese domestic market.
As for the Subaru BRZ's interior, you’d better enjoy driving it because anyone tempted away from a VW Scirocco won’t be impressed. The part-leather/part-Alcantara bucket seat clamps you superbly, the gearstick and small steering wheel are close at hand, but the radio and air-con controls look cheap, none of the plastics are a match for a VW product, and the frameless doors affect motorway refinement.
This is a trad Subaru interior, then. You can level the same criticism at a Forester or Legacy. Again, Subaru knows this, and knows it spent its cash on the engineering. If you’re worried about that sort of stuff, then just accept that the Subaru BRZ isn’t the sort of car for you.
We need more time in the BRZ (our initial test drive was somewhat limited) before we award it the full five stars, but if you’re prepared to make the compromises on cabin quality, then what the BRZ offers in exchange is rather wonderful.
Add your comment
Sign in You must be signed in to submit a comment.
Subaru BRZ (2012) CAR review
Subject
Your comment
By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions
Cancel
You must be logged in to subscribe to a topic
Login or register now
varunjk says
RE: Subaru BRZ (2012) CAR review
i actually rather like the interior. It's sensibly laid-out, logical and the curving lines lend it a non-pretentious look, if you get what I'm saying. Granted, the Scirocco is far better put together - note here, CAR, what really matters at this price level is not the plastics and leathers but how they're assembled and how they look - and it looks at least as sensible (and humdrum?) as the Subaru. The Peugeot RCZ (a personal favorite, gawpy nose notwithstanding) is aeons ahead of the two in that vital feel-good factor but then you'd be losing yourself more in the buttons than the ambience. The BRZ itself is the sort of car that would make an eminently sensible, enjoyable and attractive package, something I like to think of as a mini-370Z of sorts. The problem is the price, which fixes at 4k and 3k above VW and Peugeot respectively and in a car lacking in some of the pair's key selling points. I only hope depreciation is kind on it for the second-hand market.
04 April 2012 17:09
AnthonySoprano says
The notion that you either have a nice drive or nice plastics is pure hokum. It is purveyed by VAG people seeking to justify the humdrum underpinnings of their ubiquitous vehicles. Indeed, VW interiors used to be truly ghastly affairs, reaching a nadir in 1991 with the Golf mk III, which combined coal-hole aesthetics with Quaver-like quality. Car itself made a cover story of this 20 years ago. All of this was radically improved a few years later, prompted by the Japanese threat, spearheaded by none other than... Toyota, who taught VAG all they know about good interior (and exterior) quality; it is ridiculous to suggest that the Japanese will fall short in this department these days.
The notion that you either have a nice drive or nice plastics is pure hokum. It is purveyed by VAG people seeking to justify the humdrum underpinnings of their ubiquitous vehicles.
Indeed, VW interiors used to be truly ghastly affairs, reaching a nadir in 1991 with the Golf mk III, which combined coal-hole aesthetics with Quaver-like quality. Car itself made a cover story of this 20 years ago.
All of this was radically improved a few years later, prompted by the Japanese threat, spearheaded by none other than... Toyota, who taught VAG all they know about good interior (and exterior) quality; it is ridiculous to suggest that the Japanese will fall short in this department these days.
30 March 2012 12:35
comment8 says
@oopnorth – I have no problem with the BRZ interior quality being criticised. I do find the use of a Sirocco as a de facto standard by which as others to be judged lazy and clichéd. CAR is very reticent when it comes to the foibles of VW products (DSGs being the most glaring) because it does not fit a convenient narrative shorthand. It could be considered a little rich to crticise others posters discourse of the subject of plastics before devoting most of your own post to the very same subject :)
30 March 2012 11:49
oopnorth says
The debate about interior trim has got way out of hand here and is out of all proportion to what is in the original article - there is only a fairly short paragraph about interior trim/frameless windows, which it is entirely appropriate to be mentioned I don't think VW interiors have been as nice since they peaked in the Mk4 Golf. Mind, everything else about that car was pretty hateful - wish I hadn't got one as a company car. I have also had Audis and whilst the interiors are very, what's the word, let's say "apparently beautifully made", they are so austere and boring - and they scratch very easily too (2007 A6, the silver plastic panel in the front of the centre console behind the gear lever). The cars themselves are horrid to drive too (including 2007 A6 2.7 tdi avant, 2002 A4 2.0 tdi) My current Subaru Outback has a plasticky interior but four years old there is no impending worry about anything stopping working, and it really doesn't matter that much to me what the inside looks like - but it is only right for Car to mention what it does look like [When's the review of the Audi Allroad coming up, guys? I want to say rude things about the cost! Ditto the Merc E class diesel hybrid...]
The debate about interior trim has got way out of hand here and is out of all proportion to what is in the original article - there is only a fairly short paragraph about interior trim/frameless windows, which it is entirely appropriate to be mentioned
I don't think VW interiors have been as nice since they peaked in the Mk4 Golf. Mind, everything else about that car was pretty hateful - wish I hadn't got one as a company car. I have also had Audis and whilst the interiors are very, what's the word, let's say "apparently beautifully made", they are so austere and boring - and they scratch very easily too (2007 A6, the silver plastic panel in the front of the centre console behind the gear lever). The cars themselves are horrid to drive too (including 2007 A6 2.7 tdi avant, 2002 A4 2.0 tdi)
My current Subaru Outback has a plasticky interior but four years old there is no impending worry about anything stopping working, and it really doesn't matter that much to me what the inside looks like - but it is only right for Car to mention what it does look like
[When's the review of the Audi Allroad coming up, guys? I want to say rude things about the cost! Ditto the Merc E class diesel hybrid...]
30 March 2012 10:33
Johann says
@comment8: makes a lot of sense what you say. I realise how the economies of scale is at play here. But having not sat in any of these three triplets I can honestly not say anything about the quality of the interior. Nor have I. I'm criticising the interior design in the Subaru version having three quarters of a skateboard on the dash instead of a whole one. I'm sad that way I know. Give me the Toyota interior of this car any day BUT as stated before the soul of this car is the boxer engine so it is total and utter sacrilege to buy this car with a Yaris badge on the bonnet. Nope only a Subaru badge will do on this for sure. But alas as you say these will be niche sellers (for either brand in Europe). Halo cars for those in the know that want a car to take on their favourite driving roads. So I applaud their existence and single minded engineering focus on being the best (semi-affordable) driver's car out there (bar none?).
@comment8: makes a lot of sense what you say. I realise how the economies of scale is at play here. But having not sat in any of these three triplets I can honestly not say anything about the quality of the interior. Nor have I. I'm criticising the interior design in the Subaru version having three quarters of a skateboard on the dash instead of a whole one. I'm sad that way I know. Give me the Toyota interior of this car any day BUT as stated before the soul of this car is the boxer engine so it is total and utter sacrilege to buy this car with a Yaris badge on the bonnet. Nope only a Subaru badge will do on this for sure.
But alas as you say these will be niche sellers (for either brand in Europe). Halo cars for those in the know that want a car to take on their favourite driving roads. So I applaud their existence and single minded engineering focus on being the best (semi-affordable) driver's car out there (bar none?).
30 March 2012 10:03
Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.
Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)
Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.