Skip to content
Subaru models, news & reviews
4
Handling
Performance
Usability
5
Feelgood factor
Readers' rating
2.5
By Ben Oliver
First Drives
09 November 2007 08:53
It is, though the naturally aspirated 2.0-litre Scooby isn’t without merit. It provides a decent base for the WRX STi, which has always been the best of the breed since the first version appeared in 1994. But Subaru has tried to go mainstream with the latest Impreza, and we've been fretting that this WRX STi would be a dull-as-ditchwater limp-wristed five-door. Now the wait is over - and we can confirm that Subaru hasn't made a dog's dinner of it. We should have guessed once we found out that the mechanicals are largely carried from the previous car, albeit improved… To read Ben Oliver's full eight-page first drive, read the new December 2007 issue of CAR Magazine on sale now
The six-speed manual ‘box is pretty much the same, though Subaru claims there’s a 30 percent reduction in shift effort. Unfortunately the looks are radically different from the distinctive outgoing Scooby, and even the huge front spoiler and aggressively blistered wheelarches can’t disguise the car’s ungainly looks. Never fear though, because you can still spec that distinct WRC blue hue, and get gold BBS wheels too. UK cars will still come with a 2.5-litre engine, but for now the only test cars are the Japanese-spec Imprezas with 1994cc engines. The major changes over the old car are the addition of a twin-scroll turbocharger, a bigger intercooler and the variable valve timing now on both inlet and exhaust sides. There are minor changes to the block for improved strength and cooling, and Subaru claims better economy and emissions. The engine also sits 22mm lower for a better centre of gravity. What we’re interested in though is the 304bhp and 311lb ft…
Add your comment
Sign in You must be signed in to submit a comment.
Subaru Impreza WRX STi CAR review
Subject
Your comment
By submitting your comment, you agree to adhere to the CAR Magazine website Terms and Conditions
Cancel
You must be logged in to subscribe to a topic
Login or register now
AlpinaCharlie says
What were they thinking?
I have always been a fan of Stis. When I was younger and had a limited budget I wanted to get the absolute maximum performance per dollar I could and went out and got my first Sti - a 2 door Type R. Though ugly as sin, it was one of the most amazing cars I've ever driven (and what a sound!). I came into a little money so three years later my next car was an M3, which fortunately looked as good as it performed. A few years later when money was tight again I closed my eyes, held my nose and bought the even uglier (last generation) Sti 4 door. Yes its performance was amazing, but I couldn't get over how ugly it was (I also missed the signature flat four engine sound) and within a year sold it for an Alfa Romeo 147 GTA with the cluchless manual transmission- SIMPLY GORGEOUS. Three years later it was time to buy another car (just a few months ago) and I was hoping that the new Sti would have at least bearable looks, but no, the car looks like it has been beaten with an ugly stick - a cross of the worst elements of the last 15 years of Hyundais and Pontiacs - what were they thinking? As great as they are in terms of price/performance I have finally given up on Impreza (I went out and bought a used Alpina B3 S instead). And though it pains me to leave the Impreza fold I needed a 4wd car for skiing as well so I've just put a down payment on the much more elegant looking Lancer Evo with its amazing SST cluchless manual transmission...
30 December 2007 22:56
Upload stories, photos or videos direct to the site, or email newsdesk@carmagazine.co.uk.
Alternatively, call 01733 468 485 (+ 44 1733 468 485)
Seen a secret new car, fabulous exotic or have news we should publish? Then get in touch now.